Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
-
more about #cuda YvetteDinosaur: Who cares about ATI Streams or CUDA, OpenCL is where its at. more » pettiblay: What about Intel integrated graphics? Am I gonna get banned for mentioning the poorest excuse of a graphics card ever? more » deanbmmv: Well Nvidia. Quality over speed for video encoding. And I don't really care how much load it takes off the CPU. I paid for a quad and I want it to fle... more » Nintenboy01: Oh, and until ATI starts getting PhysX support I'm still going with Nvidia. more » HaukWebster: ATI vs. Nvidia Consumers win more » -
#graphics
ATI Stream vs. Nvidia CUDA Graphics Accelerated Deathmatch
The eternal graphics war: ATI vs. Nvidia. With the rise of GPGPU computing, if you're deciding who to fall in line with based on their graphics-accelerated platforms—Stream or CUDA, respectively—PC Perspective's done the dirty benchmarking work for you. More » -
#ati
Nvidia Badaboom and ATI Avivo GPU Video Transcoders Battle to the Death
Dedicated graphics cards from ATI and Nvidia used to be critical just for gamers and pros, but now they do a lot more than make splattered guts look good. Like make video transcoding really fast. -
#nvidia
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800 Claims Most Powerful Graphics Card Ever, Probably Handles Crysis OK
Nvidia has released what it describes as "the most powerful professional graphics card in graphics history"—the Quadro FX 5800, which packs up to 240 of Nvidia's CUDA independent graphics cores for shouldering some of the load normally handled by the main processor as well as 4GB of graphics memory, another claimed first. The 5800 is intended mostly for scientific and medical visualizations, as well as crazy complex 3D rendering. One might imagine it would also play most of your video games at a decent FPS. Price? $3500. More »
