Enter your username and password.
-
more about #photographers Noobs-R-Us: Don't they have hospitals in Europe where they can do this? WHy did he have to fly all the way back to the U.S. from Afghan? They might have been able... more » loslosbaby: Pulitzer. more » GreyHammer: he figured he could use the pictures when he writes his book about the experience. more » aido2002: You know the xkcd that shows the difference between a scientist and a regular person? The regular person pulls a lever, gets electrocuted, and then wa... more » anexanhume: That guy had the courage to stand up and do his job, even when danger was afoot. more » Bertone77: That guy is hardcore. more » Santa_Lock22: A 5D Mark II? I've got even more respect for him now! Seriously though, that's really great. Photography sure can bring out the dedication in people. more » something_unique_and_descriptive: That's a lot of glass... more » Shamoononon: I shave my legs.: Why does that guy need to be on his head to take the picture? That makes no sense. more » taciturnforsale: My god that's an expensive batch of camera equipment. more » Nick: i wonder why the dude in the split third photo didn't just bend over and look back between his legs. that is some great teamwork, though. more » Lite: hates Illinois Nazis: Does the gal in the first photo have a massive badonkadonk ass to counterbalance all that dead camera weight or something? more » bosskev: For shots over-the-heads of crowds, I have done exactly what you see in the 3rd gallery photo, using a monopod fully extended. You can't usually see w... more » Kaiser-Machead: Big Chief Photog still no match for Dances with Paparazzi. more » Zach Morin: Crap crap crap crap crap. All this digital BS looks the same. Where is Ansel Adams? Cindy Sherman? Alfred Steiglitz, Edward Weston, William Eggleston,... more » Nick: hey Mark, before i go check it out are any of them NSFW? more » Monty: My wife is going to be pissed that you have photos of me taking pictures of - er - yes -- okay, I'm in trouble. more » weatherman: If I see a NSFW tag, I want some F-ing NSFW? There ain't no NSFW in there! WTF? BBQ! more » deathbytray: I think at least one of the so-called "pretty girls" is a dude. more » KanSer: Pervs? Who's a perv? Why's that jubbly-shot censored? more » -
#courage
AP Photographer Loses Foot in Bomb Blast, Never Stops Taking Pictures
AP photographer Emilio Morenatti's left foot had to be amputated after he was injured in a bomb blast in Afghanistan. That didn't mean he stopped shooting, however. More » -
#imagecache
The Things You Have to Do for Money—and a Good Photo
"OK, I'm ready for everything! EVERYSINGLETHING!" More » -
#photography
50 Photographers Worth Checking Out
Hongkiat has put together a list of 50 photographers you should know. Some work is brilliant and some is just cheesy. But all of the portfolios (warning: some nudes) will help kill a Friday. [Hongkiat/photo] -
#valentines
A Tribute to Creepy Guys Taking Pictures of Pretty Girls (NSFW)
Today we celebrate the unsung hero of the trade show, the creepy guy who stops at nothing to acquire the perfect shot of a girl who probably hates him. More » -
#photographerfashion
Overpriced Re:Vision Bracelets Were Once Overpriced Camera Lenses
For the photographer with a sharp eye (for recycling) come these innovative bracelets from Australian designer Craig Arnold. Called the re:vision line, these premium-priced baubles are assembled using the discarded lens casings of some of the world's most well-known camera brands. (I swear I spotted a Minolta in there somewhere.) The bad news is that these hacked-up lens hand-me-downs are priced from around $175 to $250, and come complete with wear and tear from their previous owner. Certainly not cheap, especially when you consider that hacksaws, hammers and your friend's brand new Nikon D60—conveniently "borrowed for the weekend"—are so readily at hand on the cheap. [re:vision via Boing Boing] -
