psystarbankruptcy

posts about #psystarbankruptcy more →
Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve
Psystar Owes Apple $75k For Some Reason

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

Kaiser-Machead
07/02/09

In reply to Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve
Again, how much of a difference would it make if Psystar simply didn't preload the OS, but offered the discs? There's nothing Apple can do about anyone actually selling sealed authentic copies of OS X.
Reply

Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred

ester
07/02/09

@Kaiser-Machead: I think Apple would have an argument if Psystar is not an authorized reseller. Copyright law does provide for control over distribution and for Psystar to buy authentic copies and sell them would appear to be a violation to me. What Psystar should do is provide all the hardware and installation instructions but have customers buy the software directly from Apple. Then I'm not sure how copyright could even come into the picture.
Reply

ester was starred ester was unstarred

itchytooth
07/02/09

@ester: This is what Newegg does, except you have to go to a whole 'nother website for the instructions.
Reply

itchytooth was starred itchytooth was unstarred

deanbmmv
07/02/09

In reply to Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve
I still don't get why it has never struck Apple that Pystars existence may be because people want OSX but not a Mac?

MS sell their OS separately, and pretty much have a huge company based just off software, yet Apple tie the software to a single PC manufacturer and on top of that have iPhones,iPods,iTune n the money of iLife/iWorks n OSX upgrades yet are still nowhere near as big as MS. So maybe if they want a bit more muchos they might wanna you know sell OSX on its own?
Reply

deanbmmv was starred deanbmmv was unstarred

ester
07/02/09

@deanbmmv: People often point out that Apple tried it. But they tried it with an inferior operating system (at the time) and poor execution. Are these people implying Apple is the same as it was then? That's rhetorical for those prepping to rip me a new one.

The fact there are hackintoshes proves there is a market. Psystar is attempting to take advantage of that market and I don't understand why there is such a backlash outside of fanatical fanboyism.

The reason Apple doesn't license their OS is three fold. One, OSX provides for differentiation among their offering of computers and they can market this as advantage over the competition. Two, Steve has often thrown out the quote that people who care about software make their own hardware and Apple wants the Mac experience to be the same regardless of which Mac you are using. If they allow Dell or HP to install OSX, they lose some control over that and it opens them up to criticism. And three, they likely subsidize their software development with hardware sales and would not create the same kind of revenue selling just the software.

Keep in mind as a hardware manufacturer, Apple's real competition is Dell, HP, etc. Microsoft is just a common component of their competitors that they can easily attack in the ads. So they'd be helping out the competition by letting them use OSX.
Reply

ester was starred ester was unstarred

Falsoman
07/02/09

@ester: Exactly. And there's also the fact that even if there's a market doesn't mean it's worth it.

Having more clients for the sake of having more clients doesn't mean jack if they don't really represent more money in the long run.

I don't think apple wants to enter a market that is wanting to spend 130 bucks every 2 years, who doesn't want to buy their other products and a market that will represent them a lot more money spent into R&D to support thousands of hardware configurations.

Apple sells as a premium brand that gives you the "whole experience" and a brand that already has an incredibly profitable business, wich is still growing and has a lot of loyal customers. I'm sure that if this business model ever stops growing, they'll try something else, until then...
Reply

Falsoman was starred Falsoman was unstarred

frigg
07/02/09

In reply to Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve
Eh, anyone else find it weird that the new computer comes loaded with Thriller, Off The Wall, Bad, Dangerous, and HIStory, and according to Psystar's website, can do the moonwalk?
Reply

frigg was starred frigg was unstarred

GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
07/02/09

In reply to Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve
Maybe b/c they dumped the "mac" part of their name, they are OK? Perhaps they saw "Double Jeopardy" w/Ashley Judd on their Netflix feed, and got a brilliant idea?
Reply

Vroomtrap
07/02/09

In reply to Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve
They need to give some pointers to GM and Chrysler on how emerge from bankruptcy quickly.
Reply

Vroomtrap was starred Vroomtrap was unstarred

qbrad
07/02/09

@Vroomtrap: Don't hire lazy, uninspired, uneducated Americans to assemble your product.

Don't hire lazy, uninspired dregs from other companies to design your product.

Oh, and certainly don't hire uninspired, greedy, obtuse executives to point your company in a positive direction.
Reply

qbrad was starred qbrad was unstarred

Lite: hates Illinois Nazis
06/11/09

In reply to Psystar Owes Apple $75k For Some Reason
I'm OK with a person going out and hacking up their laptop to run MacOS. I kind of admire it. But, at least (hopefully) the person purchased a copy of Mac OSX.

Psystar was building machines as a business model that were designed to undercut Apple. Not quite the same as the lonely basement guy goofing around.

Plus, if they had won, it would have some pretty strange repercussions in the IP world when it came to EULAs being enforceable.
Reply

deanbmmv
06/11/09

In reply to Psystar Owes Apple $75k For Some Reason
I still don't understand why Apple don't allow clones?
Reply

deanbmmv was starred deanbmmv was unstarred

Kaiser-Machead
06/11/09

@deanbmmv: Apple doesn't allow clones because its business depends largely on profits earned from its hardware, not its software. It can't afford to pull a Microsoft on its current model, and would probably see bankruptcy in a sea of clones.
Reply

Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred

Kaiser-Machead
06/11/09

In reply to Psystar Owes Apple $75k For Some Reason
Samifumi hit the nail right on the head, and Psystar had a little too much confidence and tried a little too hard to make its experiment fly. If they had any sense, they would've just provided all of the necessary components to hackintosh, without actually making a hackintosh.
Reply

Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred

Samifumi
06/11/09

In reply to Psystar Owes Apple $75k For Some Reason
They had a good idea, and solid legal ground to fight a good battle with Apple, if they didnt pre-install the Mac OS onto the machine.
Reply

Samifumi was starred Samifumi was unstarred

jerNELS
06/11/09

@Samifumi: so would it be possible to run a company that sells computers that don't come pre-installed with mac os, but are designed to be easily hackintoshable? particularly netbooks and desktops? because i think you have a pretty nice market there... just saying. and would that be illegal? i'm pretty sure it wouldn't just ship with linux or nothing, who cares?
Reply

jerNELS was starred jerNELS was unstarred

Samifumi
06/11/09

@jnelson2525: Yes, the argument would be that you did not commit copyright infringement in the circumstance you were building computers that gave consumers a choice to install whichever computer OS they preferred. The only way Apple could have pursued PsyStar would be through the tenuous secondary liability theory, and even in that circumstance they could argue that they simply were providing consumers the ability to exercise the fair use doctrine, installing the OS they paid $100 for a license.
Reply

Samifumi was starred Samifumi was unstarred

Hello Mister Walrus
06/11/09

@Samifumi: The thing is, even if Psystar would have eventually been legally entitled to sell Hackintoshes, there's no way they would have the resources to survive a long, expensive legal battle with Apple. Apple has had lawsuits that lasted for more than ten years.
Reply

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#psystarbankruptcy

Gizmodo

Gizmodo Team

Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve

Psystar Owes Apple $75k For Some Reason

#psystarbankruptcy

Gizmodo

Gizmodo Team

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo

Psystar Emerges From Bankruptcy With New Product, Same Insane Resolve

Psystar Owes Apple $75k For Some Reason

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment