Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/14/09
Of course, this depends on the very definition of what a human is... #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
"More Human Than Human is our motto." -Tyrell (from Blade Runner)
11/13/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/13/09
to be human is to have sentience, reason, and language, and to reside in this universe. no animal or computer yet fits the bill. #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
If I replace almost my entire body, enabling my static personality/mind to live forever, and I still human? The possibility of Death may contribute to being "human".
11/13/09
***huge generalization coming up***
Assuming that the majority of Gizmodo readers are "dorks/nerds" ("dorks/nerds" being less physically blessed. Yes, huge generalization/sterotype), would a "Brad Pit" type be more inclined to attach his humanity to his physical body? #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
As such, I would say you're no longer human if you don't have all of the following:
Your original organic brain, and your original organic reproductive system. #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
aha, I knew someone like you might make a response like that.
This article is talking about replacing parts of our body with robotic components. Does your mother have a robotic uterus now? #thiscyborglife
11/14/09
11/14/09
But otherwise, no.
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
I think humor has to be involved somehow, as it generally relies on an understanding of at least some sections of a social construct.
If you get to the point where you're just seeing data without seeing the overlying social connections, you're probably pretty robotic and not cyborg-ey.
Examples of robotic humor:
Robot Seinfeld: I'VE GOT THIS PAIN ALL ALONG THE DIODES IN MY LEFT ARM. WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH THAT.
Robot Internet Humor: ALL YOUR BASE 10 ARE BELONG TO US. #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
I recognize pain, but I don't really care that it's there.
I often don't catch the punch-lines in jokes and I'm more intensive at looking at data than google.
I'm made of pure flesh though.. except my fillings.
I laughed at the base 10 joke xD #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
I'm not saying that's good, bad, right, or wrong... just my opinion on classification of our species. We could still refer to ourselves as human, (and I think we would) but I think there would be a new classification. Homo Sapiens Secundum Corporis, perhaps? #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
If a human brain is uploaded into the same hardware as a self-aware artificial intelligence, and both have the capability to replicate themselves (identically, or with approximations of generational mutation) how do you define the distinction between them? If both have the same levels of perception, the same ability to make judgments, and moral decisions... how do you distinguish which one is human, except by accepting a declaration of such? In a purely digital existence where any bits can be shifted to represent any dataset, how can a purely digital version of humanity be distuinguishable from an artificial intelligence which can replicate the same dataset and exhibits the same behavior? It's my opinion that at that point, the essence of humanity is altered and requires new classification, even if it still behaves in ostensibly "human" fashion. However, I believe that there would be many fundamental alterations in perceptions of behavior, morality, thought and action with such a massive change. #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
Flesh uncovered, after all #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Huh. I guess my answer falls into the "As long as you still have your brain" category. #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
"Ro-Busters is a commercial rescue organisation run by Howard Quartz, known as "Mr. 10 Per Cent" because 90% of him is robotic (a 'person' must have at least 10% organic matter to qualify as human)." #thiscyborglife
11/12/09
11/12/09