• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#radiation

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 6:50 AM
Mon Nov 9
15 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #radiation more →

    Programming Error Gives People 8 Times Correct Radiation over 18 Months

    A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains

    The 'Space Snuggie' Could Protect Astronauts From Radiation

    Cellphones Cause Kidney Stones and Heart Disease Now

    E-Wave Chip Protects Against Scary, If Not Scientifically Proven, Threat of Cellphone Radiation

    IBEX Launches Today on Man's Most Depressing Space Mission Ever

    DIY Geiger Counters Help Us Face Our Dismal, Irradiated Futures

    Everyone Will Be a Walking Nuclear Weapon Detector

    Japanese Couple Sold Glowing Lanyards That Were 26 Times Allowable Radiation Level, Gets Arrested

    Snuggle Up to the Looming Nuclear Apocalypse with RST's Gamma Ray-Fighting "Miracle Material"
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Identity (reclamation) Identity (reclamation)
    10/15/09

    In reply to Programming Error Gives People 8 Times Correct Radiation over 18 Months
    Scanners, X-rays, and the like scare me quite heavily enough already. I had to get a mouth x-ray semi-recently, and I think I asked the radiologist if it was safe about ten times before I went ahead with it.
     Reply
    Identity (reclamation) was starred Identity (reclamation) was unstarred
    Image of valkilmerisawful valkilmerisawful
    10/15/09

    In reply to Programming Error Gives People 8 Times Correct Radiation over 18 Months
    is this one of those "no harm no foul" situations?
     Reply
    valkilmerisawful was starred valkilmerisawful was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat
    10/15/09

    In reply to Programming Error Gives People 8 Times Correct Radiation over 18 Months
    Didn't someone notice an uptick in the dosimeters?
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat was starred GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat was unstarred
    Image of ♠ Final ♠ ♠ Final ♠
    10/15/09

    @GitEmSteveDave_I'mMonkeypig: The control Dosimeters would be on the outside next to the control console.
     Reply
    ♠ Final ♠ was starred ♠ Final ♠ was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat
    10/15/09

    @♠ Final ♠ is Soylent Green now.: Exactly. #ctscanradiationoverdoses
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat was starred GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat was unstarred
    Image of ♠ Final ♠ ♠ Final ♠
    10/15/09

    @GitEmSteveDave_I'mMonkeypig: It's on the other side of the shielded wall so it wouldn't effect the dosimeter. #ctscanradiationoverdoses
     Reply
    ♠ Final ♠ was starred ♠ Final ♠ was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat
    10/15/09

    @♠ Final ♠ is Soylent Green now.: Wouldn't the residual radiation in the room after the shot be picked up when the tech enters? #ctscanradiationoverdoses
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat was starred GitEmSteveDave_RockinLabCoat was unstarred
    Image of ♠ Final ♠ ♠ Final ♠
    10/15/09

    In reply to Programming Error Gives People 8 Times Correct Radiation over 18 Months
    Who ever in the hell was their Physicist was needs to be fired because that should have been caught way before then. On average you're getting a years worth of radiation for a head CT and 2 and a half years worth of background radiation for an abdominal study in the course of 10 seconds to 15 minutes and that's for a normal dosage.
     Reply
    ♠ Final ♠ was starred ♠ Final ♠ was unstarred
    Image of Jrsy Devil's Advocate® Jrsy Devil's Advocate®
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    Everyone save yourselves! Throw away your cell phones. Smash them! We'll go back to using public payphones. They're much safer...
     Reply
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was starred Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was unstarred
    Image of yeti yeti
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    Why is it that people are afraid of cellular frequencies, but not bluetooth?
     Reply
    fuchikoma promoted this comment yeti was starred yeti was unstarred
    Image of fuchikoma fuchikoma
    09/09/09

    @yeti: I have a spectrum analyser for 2.4GHz radio bands and I checked out some BT gear on it... Wi-fi is pretty weak compared to a cel phone, but compared to Wi-fi, Bluetooth barely shows up as a smattering of background noise.

    So I'd wondered the same, but looking at it, BT is really negligible. You will literally get more radiation in the same frequency band by standing in the same room as a properly working microwave oven while using it.
     Reply
    fuchikoma was starred fuchikoma was unstarred
    Image of Bandit Bandit
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    The incidence of cancer in our world is WAY up over the historic rate. And cancer is virtually unknown in undeveloped areas of the planet. Coincidence?
     Reply
    Bandit was starred Bandit was unstarred
    Image of kagekiri kagekiri
    09/09/09

    @Bandit: I think you have to account for differences in life spans and detection rates if you want to compare the "developed" world to other areas or historical rates. If you don't have CT scans, MRIs, constant mammograms, colonoscopies, and prostate exams, you aren't going to realize/record that what killed someone was unchecked cancer. And, if you're dying because of bad water, bad nutrition, constant warfare, etc, you're less likely to live long enough to get cancer. For all we know, "old age deaths" from times before x-rays, proper autopsies, and the like could actually be cancer deaths.
     Reply
    kagekiri was starred kagekiri was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    10/06/09

    @kagekiri: +
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of FuzzysFriedChicken FuzzysFriedChicken
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    The SAR limit is in the US is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1g of tissue. Everywhere else in the world it is 2.0 W/kg averaged over 10g of tissue. The US has the most strict standard in the world.
     Reply
    Bandit promoted this comment FuzzysFriedChicken was starred FuzzysFriedChicken was unstarred
    Image of wkm001 wkm001
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    I don't understand the units of measurement. Watts/Kilogram. Who gives a shit how much the phone weighs. The radiation is the only thing you care about.
     Reply
    AmphetamineCrown promoted this comment wkm001 was starred wkm001 was unstarred
    Image of AmphetamineCrown AmphetamineCrown
    09/09/09

    @wkm001: The measurements relate to the Watts of energy absorbed per kilo of body tissue. It has nothing to do with the phone weight.
     Reply
    AmphetamineCrown was starred AmphetamineCrown was unstarred
    Image of thegreatfratsby thegreatfratsby
    09/09/09

    @AmphetamineCrown: You handled that much more politely than I ever could have.
     Reply
    thegreatfratsby was starred thegreatfratsby was unstarred
    Image of Curves Curves
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    More frightening to me is that every woman I know (including myself), at one time or another, carries her cell phone in her bra.
     Reply
    Curves was starred Curves was unstarred
    Image of Scott Jackson Scott Jackson
    09/09/09

    @Curves: do you mean every fat woman you know? Because the only women I know who do that are big girls.
     Reply
    Curves promoted this comment Scott Jackson was starred Scott Jackson was unstarred
    Image of Curves Curves
    09/09/09

    @Scott Jackson: Surprised you know any women at all.
     Reply
    Curves was starred Curves was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    10/06/09

    @Curves: ++ rebuttal.

    Since I'm married I am developing some "man cans", however I would personally rather have a tumor on my breast than on my brain. Also, did it state it was a constant radiation, or was it while the device is being used? I could see smartphones giving off more than others with wifi/3G/GPS and the like being accessed more frequently and also while calls aren't being made.

    Then again, if your friends can talk on their phone while it's in their bra... bravo.
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of SigmundTheSeaMonster SigmundTheSeaMonster
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    Can you hurt me now? - Verizon's original slogan.

    (No wonder they have better coverage, all that power frying your cells...hence cell-phone...)
     Reply
    SigmundTheSeaMonster was starred SigmundTheSeaMonster was unstarred
    Image of maven2k maven2k
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    Great, I keep mine in my front pants pocket, does that mean Mr. Happy is gonna be Mr. Tumor?
     Reply
    maven2k was starred maven2k was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    10/06/09

    @maven2k: I suppose that depends if there is enough tissue there for it to be a problem.

    Wakka wakka! (I kid!)
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of dingus dingus
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    My old Treo 650 always got bottom of the charts on these lists. It could make a speakerphone GSM-chirp at 10 feet. But my Cuato sure loved its solid reception.
     Reply
    dingus was starred dingus was unstarred
    Image of ArcticLotus ArcticLotus
    09/09/09

    @dingus:
    "Open your mind, and buy me a bluetooth!"
     Reply
    dingus promoted this comment ArcticLotus was starred ArcticLotus was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    10/06/09

    @ArcticLotus: LOL! Stay out of my mind. I instantly thought of him on the Cuato comment.
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of FriarNurgle FriarNurgle
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    Umm... Verizon is oddly absent from the top ten list.

    Can you hear me now with that brain tumor?
     Reply
    Monty promoted this comment FriarNurgle was starred FriarNurgle was unstarred
    Image of Monty Monty
    09/09/09

    @FriarNurgle: As someone using Verizon and with a brain tumor I can hear you perfectly. That said, we are all carrying around mini microwave ovens in our pockets, and whether your device is listed at the top or the bottom of the list the risk is likely similar.
     Reply
    Monty was starred Monty was unstarred
    Image of SigmundTheSeaMonster SigmundTheSeaMonster
    09/09/09

    @Monty: Don't forget the microwave radiation we are saturated with from DirectTV, GPS and ComSATS...

    Everyone seems to forget the power those units need to cover a continent...
     Reply
    SigmundTheSeaMonster was starred SigmundTheSeaMonster was unstarred
    Image of Barry99705 Barry99705
    09/09/09

    In reply to A Guide to Cell Phone Radiation So You Don't Fry Your Brains
    So you're saying we should all walk around with a 2.4Ghz radio stuck in our ears? Sounds like a worse idea than occasionally having a phone up to our head every now and then.
     Reply
    Barry99705 was starred Barry99705 was unstarred
    Image of jetRink jetRink
    09/09/09

    @Barry99705: That bluetooth headset only needs to transmit a signal about a meter. The cellphone needs to send a signal about a kilometer. The power difference between the two is huge.
     Reply
    OCEntertainment promoted this comment jetRink was starred jetRink was unstarred
    Image of dingus dingus
    09/09/09

    @Barry99705: 10mW at a frequency that doesn't penetrate into skin well vs. 2W at lower frequencies with better tissue absorption... I know which I'd rather take.
     Reply
    dingus was starred dingus was unstarred
    Image of OCEntertainment OCEntertainment
    09/09/09


    @jetRink:
     Reply
    OCEntertainment was starred OCEntertainment was unstarred
    Earlier threads | All threads | Show hidden threads | Show featured threads only | Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.