The changes in the brain are due to the intense spike in linguistic creativity. Constant, fast-paced language without any visual cues requires much more interpretation than face-to-face conversation. #cellphones
If the phones mess us up by us placing them up against our ear, what would happen if we implanted them inside ourselves and have them closer to our brains? Wouldnt that put more radiation closer to our brains? Or would there be a ultra low radiation model implanted? #cellphones
@KTK1990: Quick correction, your idea is good except cellphones don't exactly emit "radiation," but just radio waves from the electromagnetic spectrum. Radiation if the emission of particles from a decaying atom.
@jseifer16: Alternating electromagnetic fields are still radiation. Up to ultraviolet light frequencies (300nm?) it's non-ionizing and doesn't have the biological effects associated with higher frequency ionizing radiation like x-rays and cosmic rays. But it's still radiation. #cellphones
@KTK1990: Let those guys argue about what is and isn't radiation.... I think you are asking about the risk of putting cell phones closer to your brain: That's a good point! However, it would matter where the antenna is. You could have the entire phone embedded in you and have the antenna external so that the majority of the nonionizing electromagnetic radiation is further away from the body. #cellphones
This is why, no matter how crazy it looks, I use my iPhone headphones 95% of the time when making a call. Strive to keep the phone away from your precious people! #cellphones
@Sam: Hahahha, I knew someone would misinterpret my statement that way.
But to answer your question, no. I take advantage of 'intensity' as it relates to the electromagnetic spectrum and keep the phone on a Contour Showcase hip holster (as geeky as it may be). Plus, my hip muscle/connective/nervous/epithelial tissue helps attenuate the signal before its reaches the ball of Krypton. #cellphones
@TheSonOfKrypton: Also, if you are the son of Krypton... Why is your phone so near to your dear fathers ball...? You know what. Never mind. I don't need to know. #cellphones
Scanners, X-rays, and the like scare me quite heavily enough already. I had to get a mouth x-ray semi-recently, and I think I asked the radiologist if it was safe about ten times before I went ahead with it.
Who ever in the hell was their Physicist was needs to be fired because that should have been caught way before then. On average you're getting a years worth of radiation for a head CT and 2 and a half years worth of background radiation for an abdominal study in the course of 10 seconds to 15 minutes and that's for a normal dosage.
@yeti: I have a spectrum analyser for 2.4GHz radio bands and I checked out some BT gear on it... Wi-fi is pretty weak compared to a cel phone, but compared to Wi-fi, Bluetooth barely shows up as a smattering of background noise.
So I'd wondered the same, but looking at it, BT is really negligible. You will literally get more radiation in the same frequency band by standing in the same room as a properly working microwave oven while using it.
The incidence of cancer in our world is WAY up over the historic rate. And cancer is virtually unknown in undeveloped areas of the planet. Coincidence?
@Bandit: I think you have to account for differences in life spans and detection rates if you want to compare the "developed" world to other areas or historical rates. If you don't have CT scans, MRIs, constant mammograms, colonoscopies, and prostate exams, you aren't going to realize/record that what killed someone was unchecked cancer. And, if you're dying because of bad water, bad nutrition, constant warfare, etc, you're less likely to live long enough to get cancer. For all we know, "old age deaths" from times before x-rays, proper autopsies, and the like could actually be cancer deaths.
The SAR limit is in the US is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1g of tissue. Everywhere else in the world it is 2.0 W/kg averaged over 10g of tissue. The US has the most strict standard in the world.
I don't understand the units of measurement. Watts/Kilogram. Who gives a shit how much the phone weighs. The radiation is the only thing you care about.
Since I'm married I am developing some "man cans", however I would personally rather have a tumor on my breast than on my brain. Also, did it state it was a constant radiation, or was it while the device is being used? I could see smartphones giving off more than others with wifi/3G/GPS and the like being accessed more frequently and also while calls aren't being made.
Then again, if your friends can talk on their phone while it's in their bra... bravo.
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
But to answer your question, no. I take advantage of 'intensity' as it relates to the electromagnetic spectrum and keep the phone on a Contour Showcase hip holster (as geeky as it may be). Plus, my hip muscle/connective/nervous/epithelial tissue helps attenuate the signal before its reaches the ball of Krypton. #cellphones
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
So I'd wondered the same, but looking at it, BT is really negligible. You will literally get more radiation in the same frequency band by standing in the same room as a properly working microwave oven while using it.
09/09/09
09/09/09
10/06/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
10/06/09
Since I'm married I am developing some "man cans", however I would personally rather have a tumor on my breast than on my brain. Also, did it state it was a constant radiation, or was it while the device is being used? I could see smartphones giving off more than others with wifi/3G/GPS and the like being accessed more frequently and also while calls aren't being made.
Then again, if your friends can talk on their phone while it's in their bra... bravo.
09/09/09
(No wonder they have better coverage, all that power frying your cells...hence cell-phone...)
09/09/09
10/06/09
Wakka wakka! (I kid!)