<![CDATA[Gizmodo: relationships]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: relationships]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/relationships http://gizmodo.com/tag/relationships <![CDATA[How to Make the First Move]]> You just saw a cute girl. How do you approach her? Do you follow her on Twitter in hopes of catching her attention? Friend her on Facebook? Get her number and call? This chart will help you decide.

You can click on the image for a closer look.

Yeah, the message is something you probably already knew: Stick to the old-school stuff. Get her number, call her up, go out for some ice cream, and see what happens. Then again, you never know, you might get the same result through Twitter. I'm not really here to judge, the chart is. [SF Weekly]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5433504&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Let's Sing About Safer Sext (NSFW)]]> Sext. Sending pictures of your naughty bits through MMS. Oh, don't play coy. You already knew what it is, so let's just watch this educational video and learn about safer sext practices from some singing, underwear-clad people.

All joking aside, there really is a lesson to take away from the clip. Those silly oh-I'm-feeling-a-bit-naughty-this-morning pictures can come back to haunt you. Because once they're sent through MMS, emails, or instant messages, those snapshots are out of your hands and you're left wondering who might wind up seeing those pictures of you in nothing but lacy stockings.

So to sleep better at night, just watch who you send pervy pictures to, keep your face or particularly identifying characteristics out of the snapshots, and don't forget about clearing the EXIF data. That's all there is to it, so be safe, kiddies.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5413051&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[These Two iPhone Apps Made Me Realize That My Love Life Sucks]]> While trying out Stud/Dud and Single?, two romance-themed iPhone apps, I've realized that I've got a lousy relationship history. First I discovered that several ex-boyfriends were "duds," then that one was actually married...to his grandmother. I can't look anymore!

Stud/Dud and Single? are pretty much public record search engines repackaged in a neat app format. There's not much to making a search with either aside from entering a name (and any details that help narrow down the query) and you'll get partial results on the iPhone and the rest emailed. But if you want, you can see video guides of the search procedures here and here.

Stud or Dud

The idea behind Stud/Dud is that it parses public records and checks for stable address history, real estate ownership, business records, professional licenses, bankruptcies, criminal records and evictions in order to determine whether you've got a "stud" or a "dud" on your hands. I've unfortunately had more than my fair share of "duds" based on this app, but they were still lovely people. Except the guy who ran off with some knee high stockings of mine. I never did figure out what happened there.

Are They Really Single?

I thought that the things I found out through Stud/Dud were going to be as depressing as it gets, but Single? proved me wrong. The app checks for marriage, divorce, spousal and other domestic relationships and then determines the likelihood of the person still being in that relationship. I didn't really care about any former lovers being in relationships, but I still tossed a few names into the search to try it out. And found out that my high school sweetheart is married to his grandmother. Awkward shock aside, the app did say that it's "unlikely" right below the "wife" designation, but geez, that's quite an error to make. At least I really hope it's an error.

After that final mortifying search, I gave up. I didn't even want to enter the last ex-boyfriend's name since at the rate I was going he'd have four wives in three states and one would be his sister. But if you're braver than I and in the mood for some horror, the apps are $.99 each through the App Store and there are various charges if you want a detailed background history (addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, etc), but honestly I think this is a fun app that shouldn't be used for such creepy things. In other words: Please don't stalk anyone. [Stud/Dud and Single?]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5408878&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Loving A Gadget-Obsessed Person Is Easier Than You Think]]> I've warned you about dating someone gadget-obsessed, but you just couldn't help yourself and fell in love with one of us. Let's talk about avoiding feeling like you're in a ménage à trois with a person and some circuits.

Gadgetwise's Jenna Wortham was forced to contemplate the hardship of loving someone who's in lust with electronics when one of her readers wrote in with a desperate plea for advice:

My boyfriend is in love with his iPhone. He uses it all the time-during dinner, the movies and even in bed! I have an iPhone too, so I can understand his obsession, but at the same time it's becoming enough of a distraction while we are together to be a problem. What should I do?

Jenna explained that, as any other relationship issue, you can resolve this one by talking with your partner. You need to set limits, figure out when it's absolutely unacceptable to reach for the digital mistress and when the wandering attention can be excused. That's it. It's that simple. Whether your lover is obsessed with an iPhone, a BlackBerry, a printer, or tricked-out ottoman, communication is key. [NY Times]

Photo by Fe Ilya

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5402711&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[This Clothespin-Looking USB Pendant Will Save Your Long-Distance Relationship]]> OK, so they won't really save any relationships, but the idea behind the Presence in Absence USB pendants is almost sweet. You keep digital scrapbooks on your pendants and then swap those instead of bodily fluids when you finally reunite.

When you get your Presence in Absence kit, the two pendants are actually one single birch wood-encased gadget. You and your dear one are supposed to use the included carving knife to separate the two flash drives and bond while cleaning up the wood shavings. This process and the future data sharing represents how the two of your are parts of a whole and belong together. You'll share pictures, videos, music, the events in each other's lives that you miss out on during times apart.

Quite sweet. Call me crazy though, but I think I'll stick to less symbolic bonding experiences when reuniting with my long-distance lover. [Dezeen]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5400837&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Poll: Men Spend 8 Minutes Per Day Stalking Partners On Facebook (That's It?)]]> The Survey of 2000 UK adult men and women also found that:
• 15 percent had updated their Facebook status to make current, or ex-partners jealous.
• 48 percent read their partner's emails to check for cheating
• 20 percent had scratched a car with a key
• 39 percent had spread rumors about an ex for revenge

So by the looks of it, half the responders are in paranoid relationships, and just under that same amount will spread lies about you when you break up. Does that sound right to you? What's your experience with Facebook and exes?

The interest comes after an 18 year old girl was sentenced to three months in a young offenders' institution after hounding another girl of the same age for years, ultimately making a death threat over Facebook. (The survey was commissioned by Alibi, a crime drama channel.) [Telegraph]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5347977&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Question of the Day: Does Your Partner Understand Your Gadget Obsession?]]> It's funny how technology can really put a wedge between two people in a relationship. That is to say, finding a couple where both parties share a genuine love for gadgets seems pretty rare. This issue is especially problematic when video games are involved. We are constantly hearing stories about how some dude is turning down sex and ignoring his family to play games online. As stupid as all this sounds, I'm willing to bet that it is a major problem with a lot of couples. Plus, gadget obsessions can be tied in with spending excessive amounts of money, which only serves to complicate matters. That having been said, I have to ask: does your partner understand your gadget obsession?

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028322&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How To Survive a Mixed Computer Relationship]]> "It is not good that man should be alone..." unless he happens to use a PC, then he's screwed. One of the more fascinating posts I've read recently, one young lady discusses, in-depth mind you, the perils of being in a mixed computer relationship. See, this girl is a bigger Mac zealot than many of you accuse us of being ("I once hooked up with a boy because he... had a Mac-inspired tattoo"), going so far as to say that dating outside of one's OS is tantamount to dating outside of one's value system. I'm speechless.

Anyone here relate to this? I mean, we already know that a near-supermajority of Americans would rather screw around with their gadgets than with their spouse, but shunning off a relationship because your would-be pal is unfamiliar with the majesty of the Dock or the subtle complexities of the Control Panel? That's pretty terrible.

Image via Mariposa Mall

HOW TO: Have a Crossplatform Relationship. [Sexerati]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=231396&view=rss&microfeed=true