Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
12/14/09
*OUCH*
12/14/09
Problem with that is precision. Because you have a smaller area, fewer muscles and fingers won't help much to control mouse movement.
Otherwise I'd try one of those vertical mouse solutions... there are some very crappy ones out there. The best ones is those who looks nothing like a mouse, and more like a joystick.
12/10/09
12/10/09
Having dealt with plenty of compost before, I can safely say that whatever the problem was, you were wrong and Carmela was right.
12/10/09
12/10/09
Though, I am pretty sure this sentence means the opposite of what was intended: "I was left with a brown lump of stuff that was indistinguishable from its original form—a good sign. "
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
At first, I was intrigued, but a closer inspection of the bread machines-sized gadget turned me off. It's just too small for a household of more than 1-2 people, and they better not be vegetarians with lots of scrap! It's also far too expensive, but I think it's aimed at people who want to feel "green" with very little effort, despite the fact it draws electricity nearly continually.
No thanks. For $39, I bought the 10.5 cu. ft."Earth Machine" compost bin from our local govt.
12/10/09
12/10/09
Right now, my nearly-full Earth Machine is practically frozen solid from the unusual 10-12 degree nights here in Portland, OR. Nature's not so good a breaking-down anything until it warms-up.
Maybe I need to invent a thermal solar composter!
12/08/09
12/08/09
In many cases the ebooks cost just pennies less than physical copies, with all of the restricted use that goes with the digital download. Ereaders are not purchased at their premium price to save pennies per purchase, and the companies have no right charging even 80% of full price for a digital restricted copy of a book.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
I typed in Bill Simmons, and it gave me 3 pages of results, A LOT of which were duplicates, and NONE were for any of the Bill Simmons I was looking for.
Now if I search on Amazon, the book I'm looking for is the first thing it showed.
I might look at a Nook in say 2 years, after they shake themselves out. For now, I'm perfectly happy with my Sony.
12/07/09
12/07/09
They must have fixed it, because the 3 pages of things it finds are the same things it found in my first 2 searches.
12/07/09
Seriously, B&N, fire your engineers and find better ones, there's plenty of good talent out there. I can't believe anyone would pass off the Nook's slow-ass interface as their best, polished work. It's disgusting. Why buy eBooks when I could (sarcasm here -) fill the time needed to open a book by reading - and finishing - a paper book?
Those of you who wonder why Apple doesn't have an eReader yet - the Nook is exactly why. Honestly, take the Nook in your hands at a B&N when you get the chance, and ask - is this something that Apple would make? Is this something that had designers with half a brain trying to actually make FUNCTIONAL products and not just salaries? Does this instill that sense of childhood wonder of simplicity and speed?
No - it doesn't. Because this is an engineering prototype sent to market. It seems like hardware companies are starting to adopt the practice of software companies to treat their customers as free beta testers. If you have any independent thinking you will REJECT devices like the Nook, regardless of apologetic and defeatist reviews at the major tech blogs.
12/07/09
!^_^}
but seriously dude, i think that waiting for an apple tablet might be best. we can almost deduce that
-portability
-screen resolution
-ease of navigation
will prob best all these current e-book readers.
i was gonna get this for my wife, but i think your comments just made me put the safety on the wallet trigger.
thanks.
12/07/09
And in response to some unapproved commenters, no I do not hold Apple shares. In fact, I think Apple has been a load of crap in recent years - no true innovation has come out of Apple since the original introduction of the iPhone in 2007 and the resurgence of Steve Jobs's medical problems - and there's still a load of bull surrounding their app approval policies. But I do not deny that what products they do make are good (even if their computers are overpriced).
12/07/09
Thanks for the great review, I've been seriously considering a nook since I first heard about them. One quick question... You sort of touched on PDFs, so I'm assuming there's no issues with loading/importing them for access on the nook? I'm using PDFs on nearly a daily basis for work, wondering if the e-ink screen can keep up with the graphs commonly used in reports?