• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#ricoh

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 9:30 PM
Tue Nov 24
65 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #ricoh more →

    Ricoh GXR, Smallest Camera With Interchangable Lenses and Sensors, Coming In December

    Rumor: Mirrorless Ricoh Camera, Interchangeable Lenses Coming November 10

    Ricoh CX2 Has Better Optical Zoom, Still Can't Shoot HD Video

    Ricoh GR Digital III Point-and-Shoot's Fast 28mm f/1.9 Lens Makes Our Hands All Sweaty

    Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot

    Tips For Shooting the Best Slow-Motion Video

    Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo

    Ricoh R10 Digital Compact Cam is Updated R8, Bigger Screen

    Ricoh Bumps Up Megapixels with the GX200 Camera

    Ricoh G600 Is Both Rugged and Fugged
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of The Lab The Lab
    11/10/09

    In reply to Ricoh GXR, Smallest Camera With Interchangable Lenses and Sensors, Coming In December
    You really have to watch the video to understand the concept. This system only seems to make sense if the pairing of a particular sensor to a particular lens had an advantage but I don't see how it would. Why would each lens need its own sensor? You could end up owning 4 lenses and four sensors, an over-investment in sensors, especially considering that inevitable improvements in sensor tech makes your lens obsolete. The more I type, the worse this idea sounds. A better system would allow one to upgrade just the camera's sensor. #ricohgxr
     Reply
    The Lab was starred The Lab was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    11/10/09

    In reply to Ricoh GXR, Smallest Camera With Interchangable Lenses and Sensors, Coming In December
    Interesting, but it by no means seems economical. It sounds like each component will set you back quite a bit, costing you between $900 and $1800 for the body and wide angle lens/body (pounds and Euros never seem to translate properly to dollars when crossing the Pacific, a $400 here may cost 400 pound sterling there). Coupled with the limitations of each body, I'm very hesitant about it. While it is nice to have a small, discrete camera like that with easily accessible, fully manual controls for street photography, I am extremely hesitant. #ricohgxr
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    11/10/09

    @Nathan Obbards: Yea, you're basically buying a new camera for each version. #ricohgxr
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of itchytooth itchytooth
    11/08/09

    In reply to Rumor: Mirrorless Ricoh Camera, Interchangeable Lenses Coming November 10
    It looks like there's going to be an explosion of these types of cameras over the next year. It makes buying one feel a bit risky, because every company is in overdrive trying to outdo the camera that came out previous. Unfortunately, they all seem to compromise in one way or another. I went ahead and ordered a GH1, because it seems to be closest to what I want. I'm pretty excited to see what Ricoh can do with this though, considering their mastery (so I've heard) of ergonomics. #ricoh
     Reply
    itchytooth was starred itchytooth was unstarred
    Image of spyker3292 spyker3292
    11/08/09

    In reply to Rumor: Mirrorless Ricoh Camera, Interchangeable Lenses Coming November 10
    If it's going to be a new mini-DSLR PLEASE use the Olympus Micro Four-Thirds mount.... #ricoh
     Reply
    Jack Loftus promoted this comment spyker3292 was starred spyker3292 was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    08/20/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX2 Has Better Optical Zoom, Still Can't Shoot HD Video
    What happened to the image stabilization?
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of itchytooth itchytooth
    07/27/09

    In reply to Ricoh GR Digital III Point-and-Shoot's Fast 28mm f/1.9 Lens Makes Our Hands All Sweaty
    Ricoh and Sigma should get married and have little DPGR4 babies.
     Reply
    itchytooth was starred itchytooth was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    07/27/09

    In reply to Ricoh GR Digital III Point-and-Shoot's Fast 28mm f/1.9 Lens Makes Our Hands All Sweaty
    What crazy manufacturer in this day and age would choose NOT put put image stabilization in their camera? Ricoh! That’s who!

    This is definitely Ricoh suave, NOT!!!
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of cobra_commander cobra_commander
    07/27/09

    @Noobs-R-Us:
    I just wrote Ricoh to put a BIG sticker on the boxes: "not recommended for peoples with shaky hands"

    Jokes aside, who need stabilization in a compact camera with a fast wide prime lens?
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us promoted this comment cobra_commander was starred cobra_commander was unstarred
    Image of mullingitover mullingitover
    07/27/09

    @Noobs-R-Us: When you have a fast enough lens, you don't really need IS. IS is usually something you put in a camera to compensate for cheap glass.

    I think they'll get along just fine with their f/1.9.
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us promoted this comment mullingitover was starred mullingitover was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    07/27/09

    @mullingitover: Meanwhile, those nice DSLR's have it! Why?

    Could it be that you don't know what you're sayinig?
     Reply
    Edited by Noobs-R-Us at 07/27/09 5:03 PM Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    07/27/09

    @cobra_commander: I'm glad those DSLR manufacturers don't think the way you do. Humm?
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of Dizznizzle Dizznizzle
    07/27/09

    @Noobs-R-Us: Um .... none of the high end Nikon, Canon, Mamiya, Hasselblad, or Leica digitals have IS. Just because Sony and Panasonic put it on mid-range cameras doesn't make it necessary.

    Since it's obvious 'you' don't know what you're talking about, I'll clarify @mullingitover's point ... larger aperture, higher ISO, lens stabilisation, and sensor compensation will all contribute to higher shutter speeds (which in turn reduce blurry images). It's like a big see-saw, go contemplate it on the playground.
     Reply
    FooSchnickens promoted this comment Dizznizzle was starred Dizznizzle was unstarred
    Image of FooSchnickens - BPH Free FooSchnickens - BPH Free
    07/27/09

    @Noobs-R-Us: You can add Leica to that list too, but what do they know, right?
     Reply
    FooSchnickens - BPH Free was starred FooSchnickens - BPH Free was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    07/27/09

    @Dizznizzle: Yes, we're talking about a high end camera here! The Ricoh is high end folks.

    It really doesn't matter how fast the lens is. Image stabilization is needed in low light when you hand held. OK? What part of that do you not get?
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    07/27/09

    @FooSchnickens:Yea, do you own a $5k camera?
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of FooSchnickens - BPH Free FooSchnickens - BPH Free
    07/28/09

    @Noobs-R-Us: No, but I play one on TV.

    The fact of the matter is that IS is not the end-all be-all of camera features. While nice to have in some situations (like shooting from wooden rollercoasters or from inside the space shuttle) most of the time you're just fine without it.

    If you're trying to shoot hand-held in low light conditions (without a strobe, I'm guessing, since that would remove the need for IS altogether) and hoping for a nice crisp shot you're either too poor to afford a tripod or too dense to know that you should be using one.
     Reply
    FooSchnickens - BPH Free was starred FooSchnickens - BPH Free was unstarred
    Image of dougiec29 dougiec29
    07/27/09

    In reply to Ricoh GR Digital III Point-and-Shoot's Fast 28mm f/1.9 Lens Makes Our Hands All Sweaty
    It's a 6mm f/1.9 lens that has the 35mm-equivalent field of view of a 28mm lens.
     Reply
    matt buchanan promoted this comment dougiec29 was starred dougiec29 was unstarred
    Image of Hello Mister Walrus Hello Mister Walrus
    05/07/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot
    I didn't know that Cillian Murphy worked for Gizmodo.
     Reply
    Hello Mister Walrus was starred Hello Mister Walrus was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    05/07/09

    @Hello Mister Walrus: Nice.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of anon anon
    05/07/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot
    only thing stopping me from breaking out the plastic is the mention of a timer mode or time lapse mode.. which is an extremely important feature for me in a p/s camera such as this.. I'd rather leave this out for a day or few hours and not my 5dm2.. Canons p/s with a hacked firmware to allow time lapse functionality might be a win over this one for that feature alone
     Reply
    anon was starred anon was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    05/07/09

    @anon: There is a built in intervalometer for timelapse. Can define hours, minutes and seconds and will shoot until the card is full.
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of bosskev bosskev
    05/07/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot
    Oh, my, that clementine is absolutely darling!
     Reply
    bosskev was starred bosskev was unstarred
    Image of superhappyfuntime superhappyfuntime
    05/07/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot
    1. How is that HDR mode not a gimmick? It certainly doesn't look anything like any HDR photos I've seen / made. It should be called something like enhanced mode. Using the name HDR has gimmick written all over it.


    2. Acceptable ISO noise? Really? That to me looks appalling. Even ISO 400 shots aren't really usable at 100%


    The price is pretty normal. I wouldn't call it a photographer's point and shoot though. For that, I'll stick with my Canon PowerShot G series, which is truly as feature packed as you can make a point and shoot.

     Reply
    superhappyfuntime was starred superhappyfuntime was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    05/07/09

    @latterman: The G series are much, much larger. We're talking compacts here. Amended the headline so you're not confused!
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    05/07/09

    @latterman: PS Don't be an asshole.
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of Mr. Moto Mr. Moto
    05/07/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot
    Fail on HDR - the face is too dark. Just looks like the exposure has been ratcheted back a stop. Still has blown highlights too.


    Also lens is too slow and the high ISO shots are very noisy.

     Reply
    Mr. Moto was starred Mr. Moto was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    05/07/09

    @Mr. Moto: Yeah, having an f/2.8 would be sweet
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    05/07/09

    @Mr. Moto: But the HDR mode is not promising miracles. It only uses two shots so of course there are still blown highlights.
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of Mr. Moto Mr. Moto
    05/07/09

    @John Mahoney: Also needs image stabilization
     Reply
    Mr. Moto was starred Mr. Moto was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    05/07/09

    @Mr. Moto: It has that too. Read the specs.


    [www.ricoh.com]

     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of Mr. Moto Mr. Moto
    05/07/09

    @John Mahoney: Yeah, it does say it has some kind of anti-blur function. That could help. Did you find it effective?
     Reply
    Mr. Moto was starred Mr. Moto was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    05/07/09

    @Mr. Moto: Didn't test it
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    05/07/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot
    Oooooooooooh....


    I like it....I like it a lot, especially the macro function, which I'd use a great deal. I'm willing to completely forget the niggles about video capture, though it's something I currently use on my SD1000, including the time-lapse function (which is actually pretty sweet.)

     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of thejager thejager
    05/07/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Review: A Photographer's Compact Point and Shoot
    nice looking specs...and nice backup... i like the Canon G10, but it is a bit more expensive...if i didnt have it already i would look very much to this camera as my pocket camera in the field
     Reply
    thejager was starred thejager was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    05/07/09

    @thejager: I'm also fixing to get a G10, unless something superfantastic at a superfantastic price comes along.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.