Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
10/27/09
Revision3 has already been announced. Pandora and Flickr were leaked in the process.
TWiT via MediaFly has also been announced.
Until the usability of the USB port is defined, it's hard to justify $30 for WiFi-N. #rokuhdxr
10/27/09
First of all, I see no market for the Roku SD model. Composite video is OK for folks still using old CRT monitors -- but then again, how many of those folks would have any idea what a Roku was anyway. And by saving $20 now, anyone would be locking themselves out of being able to upgrade the to HD if they upgrade their TV in the future.
As for the HD-XR, $30 is way too much extra to charge for just the wireless-N card. In fact, this should have been the minimal replacement for the original Roku HD at the same price point. I don't know if Roku intends to keep the HD and the HD-XR on the market simultaneously for long, but it seems like the HD should be dis-continued now. I'll have to wait until the firmware upgrade to see what the HD-XR is really bringing to the table, but right now I feel silly for anxiously awaiting this upgrade.
What would really seal the deal for me would be access to streaming media from a NAS or home server. Maybe then I could finally replace my aging XBOX (original) running XBMC (but probably not!)
10/27/09
There's something to be said for simplicity and hardware that doesn't aim over the heads of the populace. The $20 saved on buying an SD model (for an SD TV owner) is a little over two months of Netflix membership.
The Roku fills a sweet spot for people who want more content but may not have the knowledge, or need, for HTPCs, NASs, extensive codec support, etc. Even a lot of SD content via the Roku is better than a pile of confusing equipment and acronyms for someone who, like my mom, just wants to enjoy episodes of British comedies, Law & Order and a few movies now and then. She is among those that might eventually have to buy an HDTV, but actually couldn't care less about 720 or 1080, and just wants to enjoy the content. I strongly suspect that there are a lot of folks out there in that demographic who are capable of setting up a Roku, and who would not scoff at a selection of SD content. #rokuhdxr
10/27/09
However, it seems silly to me for Roku to devote resources to create a crippled version of their standard device for such a small cost savings. One of the great things I though Roku did was to release a single device with known abilities rather than sectioning up the market, causing confusion. Now, instead of just talking to someone about the 'Roku box', they will have to specify which box. I would have prefered a direct replacement upgrade of the Roku HD with the HD-XR rather than expanding it to a series.
As far as cost goes, $20 is a minimal savings. But what you loose is the ability to integrate the box into an HD or fully-digital system in the future. Instead, you would have to spend a fresh $100 (or $130). Right now, I can easily integrate the $100 Roku box into my home theatre with analog inputs, with the knowledge that when I upgrade my TV next year to HDMI, I won't have to buy a new box to go with it. Perhaps the Roku SD makes sense at ~$50, but not at $80. #rokuhdxr
10/27/09
10/19/09
10/20/09
HTPC's are great. I'm prepping to build one right now. But even with the advent of cheap, HD capable hardware, and software improvements like 7MC, HTPC's are still for the 1%-ers. Difficulties with remotes, hardware, codecs, software are still a minefield for the vast majority. HTPC's are still for the hobbyists, or those willing to pay professionals/professional hobbyists.
Turn it on; press play. That's where it's at. Most people want to watch the movie, not troubleshoot it. #rokuxr
10/19/09
Yeah, I have my home theater set up in the living room where the Roku would be pointless, but I also have a tv in the bedroom which a much more barebones system- just a cablebox, tv, cheap blu-ray player and speakers. With this box I was (cheaply) able to get movies on demand from Netflix that I can watch before I go to sleep without dealing with hooking up a notebook. Also it is small which is important since my tv is just on my dresser- I couldn't even fit an HTPC if I could afford it.
Now with all of that, would I pay extra for wireless-n or usb? Definitely not, but the Roku for $99 is more than worth it. #rokuxr
06/02/09
06/02/09
Is that a major scoop or poor fact checking. Sony didn't drop any bombshells like that at their E3 conference today.
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
Last month I watched nearly 15 hours of documentaries, and probably 10 to 12 hours of various classic films and episodic television, via Netflix streaming. That's in addition to the 3 movies I got on DVD. Since I already had an "unlimited" plan, I'm not paying any more for Netflix than I already was. I estimate, base don my viewing habits, that my Roku cost has come to about 2 cents per movie watched.
Not to mention that the majority of the available library isn't available in surround, so it's no big loss. Given that they've already added HD and other streaming channels, I'm sure multichannel sound isn't far off. But to deny the convenience or value of Netflix based on lack of it seems rather impetuous. But, I suppose we all have our high standards to maintain.
I've said before, Netflix streaming (especially via Roku) is great, but not for everyone. One must realize that the content is not premium "first run" movies (If you're looking for HD & surround sound to flex your AV muscles, then move along). That being said, what is there is a treasure trove of entertainment for the viewer who enjoys finding forgotten movie gems, underrated series, and documentaries.
03/23/09
03/23/09
I agree, why are PS3 owners left out?
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
If you have a Roku you're already getting at least one DVD per month from Netflix, so to me it doens't make sense to pay so much for Amazon's content via the Roku. With no internal storage in the Roku, I certainly don't want to pay $15 to stream a movie I can't keep, when that's equal to the actual DVD release price.
02/20/09
02/20/09
02/20/09
Also, it's much harder to "remember" streamed movies compared to DVDs, if you get what I'm talking about...
02/06/09
02/06/09
01/28/09
01/28/09