<![CDATA[Gizmodo: rolling]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: rolling]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/rolling http://gizmodo.com/tag/rolling <![CDATA[RollingShutter Reminds Us That While Jello Wiggles, Videos Should Not]]> What's wrong with that video from last night? Things seems a bit skewed, distorted, and wiggly-jiggly. No, I'm not focused on that redhead in the tiny pink shirt, I'm talking about a fixable issue with CMOS-based video cameras.

RollingShutter, a plug-in for After Effects and Nuke, recently came to our attention, not because it's a good plug-in (although it is), but because it brings up a flaw with CMOS sensors: Video cameras using CMOS sensors tend to suffer from a major annoyance in the form of skewing anytime the camera is shifted or a fast-moving object flies through the frame. This is mainly due to the line-by-line top-to-bottom scanning done by these cameras and it will make your videos look like a mild acid trip.

The good news is that this pesky issue can be corrected post-production with tools such as RollingShutter. What RollingShutter does is use Local Motion Technology to correct that unsightly jiggling. This means that rather than globally correcting entire frames, the plug-in corrects individual parts of the images and prevents accidental introduction of new distortion.

Your camera won't learn to focus on the fly all of the sudden, but the difference in the before and after clips in the video is pretty huge and almost makes RollingShutters $500 price tag an easier pill to swallow for those who only want their jello to wiggle and jiggle. [The Foundry via badrobot]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5351453&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[$500 AMP Music Droid Dances (and Looks) Like a Bot Outta Hell]]> Move over WALL-E, take a hike Rolly, Automated Music Personality—from Hasbro's Tiger Electronics and Sega Toys—has come to claim the throne of dancing robot music speakers once and for all. Video after the jump

Its Segway-esque legs dance to the beat of any MP3 player via 3.5mm jack, and its 49 LEDs stay shining like some kind of cybernetic Rhinestone Cowboy. The A.M.P. has touch-sensitive DJ scratching pads and 62 sound effects built in so you can spice up your songs with a little "wiki-wiki", and an IR sensor so he will follow you (and his remote) from room to room and keep the music playing in your direction.

Too bad the A.M.P. costs 500-f'ing-dollars, which won't even buy you a Li-ion battery, since you either plug the knee-high bot into the wall (huh?) or fill it full of D cells. What's this thing made of? SOLID GOLD? It sure dances like it. Bring the price down to $99, and I will buy it. Available in October. [A.M.P., Gearlog]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017762&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Clocky Rolling Alarm Clock Now Available]]> What started out as an MIT nerd's dream has now become an MIT nerd's cash machine. Oh yes, Clocky, the world's most annoying rolling alarm clock is now available.

When you hit the snooze button, Clocky will roll off your nightstand and all around your room, beeping and flashing until you get up and catch it. Seriously annoying, yes, but so was your mother when she was getting us up to go to school. And look where that got us. Oh wait, nowhere.

Product Page [Nandahome via uber review]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=223677&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Trunki: Fer Wee Bairns]]> With childhood obesity on the rise, this is a perfect solution for keeping wee Wally or Wanda sufficiently wotund. While we wealize that sometimes a kid just wants to wide, exercise be damned, I'd be worried this thing would tip over, but we're assuming that's already been taken care of in pwewiminary design. However, for about $30 your wittle one can hop on top his or her durable and woomy twunk and take a wittle breather.

Product Page [Trunki]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165475&view=rss&microfeed=true