Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
It's going to be sold $100 not $600. The bill of material on the phone is below $150, manufacturing costs per phone is below $15. Google can subsidize it to $100 unlocked if you buy it through an active Google account. I think it'll even come with free 100mb data usage per month, enough for as much Google Voice, Gtalk, Gmail, App pings and image-less browsing that you want. With 1GB for $10 in the US and 1GB for less than 5€ in Europe.
I wonder if Google will be "reselling" connections to T-Mobile's 3G network, assuming they're trying to push the VoiP and data approach. That might explain T-Mobile's recent efforts to expand 3G and upgrade speeds. Was it ever 100% confirmed that "Project Black" referred to T-Mobile's recent pricing restructure, and not... something else?
If Google decide to brand and sell their own phone (even if it's actually built by HTC)... how is that going to affect 3rd parties who want to ship Android phones, like Motorola? I can't imagine they'd be terribly thrilled to be competing against Google on a phone running Google's mobile OS.
My understanding is this is the prime reason why Microsoft always refuses to build their own phone.
So what happens if Google does this, and Microsoft releases WinMo7 next year and it doesn't suck?
@tande04: In the eyes of the phone manufacturers, it's unfair competition. Google phone will run the latest and greatest software, while they are stuck with old stuff.
@kidphat: I don't think they're going to hold anything back to other phones, there may be a few extra features and advantages, but that's any phone. The Hero got Sense UI, which I would say is a big step up from other android OS phones. Not to mention, I'm expecting 2.1 to come to the hero in the near future.
To be honest, I'm trying to see how this is any more the "Google phone" than the G1 was. Hardware by HTC, Software by google, maybe a unique UI. Sounds like half of HTC's current line.
@Segador: Oh yeah. If they didn't want people tweeting it I'm sure they would have said, "don't tweet this" when they handed them out.
Makes more sense to me personally. You just wouldn't want to do it too far from the release of the phone. Rumors are already popping up that say Jan which makes sense from a 'buzz' perspective.
@Segador: Not that it matters, seeing as how this is Android, the OS that allows constant innovation in hardware and software.
I'm actually curious, will this be the year that the iPhone actually gets a real update? First time, add 3G and memory. Second time...add memory and make it faster.
How about some real changes to the OS and hardware?
It still sounds like the phone is going to be released by google and isn't just another android handset.
Tmonews has had a couple of stories on it that I haven't seen elsewhere. Here is the latest where they're saying its going to be sold by google but supported by t-mobile: [www.tmonews.com]
Here is one where they first started saying "supported" by t-mobile [www.tmonews.com]
Add that with the fact that there appears to be a CDMA passion and you've got an interesting set up. Could still be data only and work on voip or it could just be a different way of doing things carrier and plan wise. Should be interesting to see in the end.
Slight aside, I've become somewhat of an android fanboy but I've got to say I don't know if I like this "live wallpapers" thing. I kinda like having the wallpaper I want not some fancy one that sounds like its all for show. Regardless, minor quibble about it.
@Yerzriknot: That's how the Android market, and the larger cell phone market, works! There is always a better phone just around the corner. Not that you shouldn't wait for this one! :P
@wingert.Andrew: Sounds like there is going to be a CDMA one too so its going to be all networks.
What the rumors are sounding like are an unlocked phone with carrier support. You buy from google (I assume get your plan from google, maybe not) and go with whatever carrier behind the scenes that you want.
If the recently rumored Googlephone is the Passion/Bravo/whatever it finally gets named, that would mean no Voip + Data only handset... unless Google plans to provide handsets and data time themselves, using an existing phone to save cost rather than commissioning a new model from the ground up.
@Killjoy: Don't know. There are still rumors of that too. There is a t-mobile blog who's name escapes me at the moment that was one of the first ones to start saying google phone = passion. It was interesting to note there that the person that leaked it just said t-mobile will be supporting it. Could be just a funny way of saying carry but it could also mean that its still going to work some what differently than other handsets. Whether its how it makes calls or perhaps more importantly how its priced.
@HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H.: You gotta admit the G1 was quite a clunker looks wise. The Droid however, looks quite nice. (Though I must say so does the Nokia N900, which surprised me. )
As for the Google phone, it probably will look cool, it just better not have a chin. :P
HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. promoted this comment
Edited by snoop_dizzle at 12/12/09 12:01 PM
snoop_dizzle was starred
snoop_dizzle was unstarred
@snoop_dizzle: Oh, I'll agree with that. I withheld judgment on the G1 until I saw it in person... but yeah, in person it's very uninspiring.
Who knew Motorola would be the company to take Android's impressive workings and build equally-impressive phones out of them? Hell, I wish I could get a Droid on T-Mobile, but I'll probably settle for a Cliq.
I would definitely applaud Google for getting into the hardware game. Steve Jobs voiced the view shared by many, that if you love software you have to do hardware. Android will only achieve its potential when the people who designed it give it the hardware it was designed for.
I don't know why people make a HUGE DEAL about battery life. It is important, but I have not yet to see any smart phone that does not need a charge everyday. So, stop bitching about battery life.
@hcho321: @dogm1: Wow, some folks got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning.
It's a legitimate question. I have a Moment. I like it, but battery life is a limiting constraint - shorter than any other device I've had and insufficient to get through 4 hours of sporadic use without charging.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
Thats how I'm thinking it works. Though I imagine its not going to be limited to just T-mobile.
12/12/09
My understanding is this is the prime reason why Microsoft always refuses to build their own phone.
So what happens if Google does this, and Microsoft releases WinMo7 next year and it doesn't suck?
12/12/09
I don't see the concerns of google in a hardware sense if everything shakes out the way that it sounds like it is.
They're not concerned about it because they can still make handsets that go to the carriers and keep their relationship alive as it has been.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/13/09
To be honest, I'm trying to see how this is any more the "Google phone" than the G1 was. Hardware by HTC, Software by google, maybe a unique UI. Sounds like half of HTC's current line.
12/13/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
Makes more sense to me personally. You just wouldn't want to do it too far from the release of the phone. Rumors are already popping up that say Jan which makes sense from a 'buzz' perspective.
12/12/09
12/12/09
I'm actually curious, will this be the year that the iPhone actually gets a real update? First time, add 3G and memory. Second time...add memory and make it faster.
How about some real changes to the OS and hardware?
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
It still sounds like the phone is going to be released by google and isn't just another android handset.
Tmonews has had a couple of stories on it that I haven't seen elsewhere. Here is the latest where they're saying its going to be sold by google but supported by t-mobile:
[www.tmonews.com]
Here is one where they first started saying "supported" by t-mobile
[www.tmonews.com]
Add that with the fact that there appears to be a CDMA passion and you've got an interesting set up. Could still be data only and work on voip or it could just be a different way of doing things carrier and plan wise. Should be interesting to see in the end.
Slight aside, I've become somewhat of an android fanboy but I've got to say I don't know if I like this "live wallpapers" thing. I kinda like having the wallpaper I want not some fancy one that sounds like its all for show. Regardless, minor quibble about it.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
What the rumors are sounding like are an unlocked phone with carrier support. You buy from google (I assume get your plan from google, maybe not) and go with whatever carrier behind the scenes that you want.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
As for the Google phone, it probably will look cool, it just better not have a chin. :P
12/12/09
Who knew Motorola would be the company to take Android's impressive workings and build equally-impressive phones out of them? Hell, I wish I could get a Droid on T-Mobile, but I'll probably settle for a Cliq.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
It's a legitimate question. I have a Moment. I like it, but battery life is a limiting constraint - shorter than any other device I've had and insufficient to get through 4 hours of sporadic use without charging.
12/10/09
Say goodbye to the sorry remains of AT&T's sorry 3G network.
12/10/09
12/10/09