Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
09/17/09
When the plane goes "lost link" (losses contact with the pilot) it follows what is known as an "Emergency Mission" which is merely a pathway back to base marked by a series of checkpoints. If the aircraft regains link, (even for a split second) it goes back to flying it's operational mission until it losses link again. Once it losses link again it'll start the emergency mission over again (if it hadn't been updated since it last regained link) starting back at checkpoint number one.
There's a good chance that it had gone lost link, started it's emergency mission and started heading home and then at some point regained link for a moment and then lost it again, thus causing it to turn around and start the emergency mission once again. This is usually a bad scenario because having had to restart it's emergency mission it may not have had enough fuel to complete the emergency mission a second time before making it back to base, thus an imminent crash was coming. The Air Force would rather shoot the plane down (thus destroying all the equipment on the plane) than let it crash and be retrieved by the Afghanistan government or military. The technology is valuable and one that sets the U.S. above all others in military warfare, it must be protected.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
I am panicking!!
What will happen when it starts fighting back?
09/15/09
09/15/09
I mean this thing is not designed to autonomously select and attack targets right?
Without a human operator it's just a nice RC gadget that can autonomously maintain altitude and fly back home, sometimes?
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/14/09
09/15/09
You do realize that's the DEFINITION of what a drone is, right? I mean... The ACTUAL DEFINITION. From the DICTIONARY. It's a book you really should become familiar with.
09/15/09
Drone
n.
1. A male bee, especially a honeybee, that is characteristically stingless, performs no work, and produces no honey. Its only function is to mate with the queen bee.
nope. I don't think that's the definition of a drone. These drones provide a very harsh sting and perform quite a bit of work. Although I suppose it's true that they produce zero honey.
09/15/09
09/14/09
09/15/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
Is this seriously a serious thought you had? Please tell me that was an ironic sort of meta-joke that I don't understand.
09/14/09
Don't worry, no fear of planes yet. Airports on the other hand...
09/14/09
also, was this an American Drone? that was just lost and then shot down by american fighters?
kooky
09/14/09
Based on what I read, it was an American drone which lost communication with its operators and was taken down by the US Air Force.
09/15/09
09/15/09
I mean, I don't know all the various components that go into my computer, so I'm no high tech wonderkid. But the writer on a gadget blog should probably know that self-guiding, autonomous, free-firing murderbots haven't yet been invented.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
As far as YOU know... ; )
09/15/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/15/09
09/14/09
Excuse me? A what kind of drone?
09/14/09
It's not the drone's fault... Beyonce's video was just so good.
09/14/09