<![CDATA[Gizmodo: screens]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: screens]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/screens http://gizmodo.com/tag/screens <![CDATA[42" Office Monitor Is As Good for Your Eyes As It Is For Your Privacy]]> This desk worker may look like a hero, but this picture, snapped in a telemarketing firm's office, is a tragic portrait of victimhood. May we all learn from his story:

According to Reddit user knobcrik:

[I]n 2005 I was working for a "telemarketing" firm somewhere on the east coast. morale was so bad at the company, management went to great lengths to keep people that actually worked hard. one of the ways they did this was a short lived but highly entertaining award for "Employee of the Month". Said employee was treated to answering calls from a "special" desk with a 42" monitor.

What a nice treat, he must've thought. I needed to stop looking at porn during work hours anyway. Then the reality set in:

[He was] the first and last employee of the month winner. The next months winner could not go more than two days with the XL monitor stating his "retinas were getting burned out by the heat from the screen".

Somewhere, deep in an office complex in Scottsdale, a blind man is weeping. Touch-dialing potential customers from a seemingly endless braille book, his only comfort is to run his fingertips across his Employee of the Month plaque. It is starting to rust. [Reddit]

UPDATE: From reader Deacon Cupcakes, proof that the EXXXTREME SCREEN phenomenon is alive and well:

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5428870&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pixel Qi Magic Screens Coming in Multitouch Tablets in 2010]]> Pixel Qi's ePaper-LCD hybrid screen 10-inch screens will invade the world in 2010. Or at least, some of it and parts of New Jersey. Their CEO says that the first units are going into "specialized multi-touch tablet devices." Hmmmm...

We can now announce that the first units are going into specialized tablet devices with multi-touch. Increasingly these screens will be super-slim, but some customers prefer the standard thickness.

Pixel Qi will be at CES in Las Vegas in early January supporting our customers. We can't yet announce with whom we will be showing but hope to shortly.

Oh noes. Your client will be at CES? And they may not be interested in super-slim screens? Then that's not you-know-who, the company whose obsession with thinness is inversely proportional to their interest in CES. Too bad, but I still have hope. [Pixel Qi via Netbook News via Slashgear]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5420522&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Liquid OLED Tech Could Lead to More Reliable, More Flexible Displays]]> We've already told you that legitimate flexible OLED displays really are coming now, but thanks to some Japanese researchers they could be more reliable—and flexible!—than we first imagined.

In layman's terms, the innovation arrives thanks to a liquid semiconducting layer that potentially bends and flexes more reliably than the "vacuum thermal evaporation" technique employed by Samsung.

In the researchers' case, the liquid, officially known as ethylhexyl carbazole (EHCz), will constantly deliver a fresh supply of semiconductors to the emitting layer. To you and me that means better, more flexible screens that might not degrade as quickly as once thought, if and when they arrive in the (near?) future. Just don't try and drink one. [PhysOrg via OLED Info - Thanks, Ron]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5338421&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Norwegian PM's Monitor Rig Surely Doubles As Tanning Bed During Long Winter Months]]> Jens Stoltenberg, Prime Minister of Norway, laughs at your puny 3-monitor setup, and then he spites you by using only one of his eight ginormous screens to catch up on some local AP news.

But aside from this wonderful picture, there's also a huge sample of plain wonderful imagery from around Norway in this collection, which ranges from the early morning hours all the way to evening. There's even an image of our new friend Stoltenberg lounging in what appears to be a Norwegian Obi-wan Kenobi hut:

The rest is really quite awesome: Cute baby shots, to emergency rescue crews in action, to wildlife, to landscape panoramas of the countryside.

Be wary though—since many of the shots are also of healthcare situations, there are a few from the morgue showing a doctor delicately preparing a deceased elderly person for Valhalla. And yes, was just being cheeky there, as I realize that's citing Norse mythology, and implies the person died in combat—life is tough!

Nevertheless, an interesting photo set if ever there was one. Thanks for sharing, Sverre. [24 Hours In Norway]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5312819&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Giant Wraparound Screen Shows Air Traffic in Real-Time]]> This installation shows all of Lufthansa's flights at once, all projected in 3D on a 180-degree, 46-foot-wide screen. And damn is it cool.

As you can see in the video, it's all controllable in real-time. I'm not sure what they've got running this setup and these screens, but it's certainly powerful. And yeah, all the flight visualizations are awesome, I'd really love to get a game of Call of Duty rocking on this setup. [Fubiz via NotCot]





]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5302024&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Busted: Why I Can't Wait for Flexible Displays]]> When I got up this morning, I threw my Kindle in my bag's padded courdoroy laptop sleeve like I always do. A few hours later, I pulled it out and it looked like this.

Granted, this is partially my fault—I didn't keep it in the ugly cover that comes with the Kindle, just like I don't lock my iPhone or any other gadget in disfiguring covers, since I'm all about naked gadgets (almost entirely for aesthetic reasons), and I thought my bag's padded sleeve provided sufficient protection. Apparently it does not when you have a heavy DSLR on the other side of the stuffing and some guy slams into your bag.

A book made out of dead trees would've buckled and creased and returned to its original shape. So would a reader with a flexible display like Plastic Logic's, which at one point was said to withstand getting smacked by a shoe. Which actually takes it one step closer to emulating books than the more fragile Kindle or any other E-Ink powered reader—too bad Plastic Logic's reader is about a year away. (Though it says something about the Kindle that I'd sort of taken to treating it almost like a real book, and that this is the first time I'd actually materially felt the gap between it and paper.)

The story for other kinds of flexible displays, like bendy OLED, is actually even more depressing, since "progress" at this point means they're now 5 years away. Given how easy it is break screens, and how much we depend on them now—witness the slow recession buttons, though I'm sure they'll experience a retro counter-touch resurgence—rugged displays that we can treat like organic materials instead of delicate magic under the constant threat of destruction by mere everyday living might be more revolutionary than expected.

Or maybe I'll just have to learn to be more careful. [Giz's Kindle Review]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5290328&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Just How Big Is the Enterprise's Viewscreen?]]> I woke up at 3AM last night with my mind racing. The extremely important question that jolted me awake: How big is the Enterprise's viewscreen? So I did the math.

First off, it depends on which Enterprise you're talking about. The original Enterprise of the '60s, which I've been watching Season 1 of on Blu-ray (quite a good restoration, btw), had what seemed like a tiny ass screen when compared to the IMAX-like experience of the new movie Enterprise. But it's not actually that small.

Using the combined knowledge of the Star Fleet Technical Manual and some screenshots of the episodes, I was able to determine that the screen is a 136-inch display with a 1.73:1 aspect ratio. That's actually smaller than the retina-searing 150-inch Panasonic plasma that we played with before. Yes, Adam Frucci and various captains of industry that have way too much money have viewed things in their own home on a larger display than a captain of a STARSHIP.

But Picard isn't going to be showed up by 21st century technology. His glorious Enterprise D has a 212-inch screen with a 1.92:1 aspect ratio, which is big enough for Riker to jam chairs through while Picard's off in a fantasy land with Whoopi Goldberg. Nice job, Riker.

Not only is this screen gigantic, it supposedly displays stuff in three-dimensions, shifting views or something so Jean-Luc can put a face to Troi's feelings of "he's hiding something". The Star Trek Wiki explains thusly:

While it is a subtle effect, the viewscreen seen throughout Star Trek: The Next Generation clearly displayed 3-D images. This effect was created in some scenes by providing multiple angles on the viewer, with the image on screen displayed at a corresponding angle, rather than a flat, single angle shot.

But what about the newest technology? What have we learned from years of actual consumer electronics development that the tech-consultants on the movie set could incorporate into the latest iteration of the Enterprise? "Bigger is better."

The display on new-Kirk's ship looks massive, but only because it's so wide. If you're measuring the screen diagonally in display-talk, it's around 326-inches, which is larger in absolute terms than even Picard's screen. It also has a 3.25:1 display ratio, making it wider than most film ratios. But if you're talking pure width, it measures about 26 feet across. Quite impressive.

If they ever do remake TNG, I suspect that the viewscreen will wrap entirely around the side of the bridge all the way to the back where neo-Worf and neo-Geordi will be able to see what's going on behind the Enterprise. It's easier to turn your head to see a display than to tell someone to press a button to change the view.

So yes, this is our dream for when we go into space. Not only will we be able to be in space, we'll have really, really big screens to watch stuff on.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5241562&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Sims 3 iPhone Screens May Touch You]]> It's been a while since we've seen or heard of EA Mobile's The Sims 3 for the iPhone, but these new screens say it all. They just say it in Simlish.

Based on the images, we can see character customization as well as open-world neighborhood and potential inter-Sim interaction. What we're not seeing is the spiffy stuff mentioned at Apple's 3.0 Update event—namely that The Sims 3 for iPhone will let you play music from your own library and has in-app commerce features, letting you purchase game items from the iTunes App Store while playing.

Additional features in The Sims 3 iPhone listed in a press release sent to TouchArcade also say the 10-hour game will feature four mini games – cooking, fishing, gardening and house repairing.

Official word says you can also make your Sim fall in love, but it's not clear if Whoo-Hooing will be part of the touch control experience.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5241558&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CinemaView Promises to Be Tempting Apple Cinema Display Alternative]]> Most Mac users looking for a nice, budget monitor will ignore Apple's Cinema Displays for monitors by Dell or other major manufacturers. But these third party monitors don't feature mini DisplayPorts.

The CinemaView is the first (third party) monitor to support Apple's mini DisplayPort standard, which means that unibody MacBook users won't need to mess with adapters to plug in. Plus, they look super Appley.

Coming in sizes up to 24-inches and resolutions up to 1920 x 1080 (slightly lower than Apple's 1920 x 1200), these aluminum and glass displays each feature 1000:1 contrast, 350 cd/m2 brightness, 5ms response and a 3-port USB hub.

But the most attractive feature is definitely the price, with the displays promised to cost somewhere between $300 and $500 when they're released sometime before September 1. [CinemaView via Macworld]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5211589&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Samsung Omnia OLED Screen Is At Least Good for Something]]> One nice thing I stumbled upon during this year's mostly underwhelming CTIA cellphone show was Samsung's wall of 300 OLED displays, the same screen used in their Omnia.

Samsung had a good thing going, but then they blew it by sticking the following slogan on the placard beside it: "meaningful innovation, wow experience."

Seriously? Sounds like a move by the same committee who commissioned this beautiful AMOLED screen to begin with, then saddled it Symbian, instead of Android, or even WinMo 6.5.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5197613&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Athena Sofa Is the Most Comfy PC, Ever]]> Sure, your PC may be packing a quad core processor, dual monitors and a second mortgage worth of RAM. But can you sleep on it? Let me rephrase that. Should you sleep on it?

The Athena Sofa is one-part luxury sofa that you will likely stain, one-part PC. We weren't able to find any specs from the designers at Artanova, but we're guessing that those integrated screens that fit so snugly into the armrests feature touch sensitivity.

Why do we assume that? Well, it makes sense from a design point of view, considering the lack of input devices. And also, if we're paying over $15,000 for a couch with a couple of monitors and a PC inside—which we are in this theoretical world where we have the $15,000 to buy an Athena—we really really want touchscreens. [Artanova via Bornrich]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5147052&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dell Mini 9 Has a More Pro Screen Than MacBook Pro]]> Rob Galbraith checks out the screens on the three hottest notebooks in their respective classes from a pro photographer's standpoint—new MacBook Pro, Dell Mini 9 and Lenovo W700—and how they stack up will surprise you

His reference monitor is a Eizo ColorEdge CE240W and he throws a Lenovo ThinkPad T60 into the mix for good measure, since its in-plane switching LCD panel produces good color reproduction and even screen brightness.

That Lenovo's ThinkPad W700—which is geared toward pro photographers and has a built-in Pantone calibrator—tops the list for color accuracy and "could just about replace a desktop display" for pro work is probably not so shocking. What is crazy, however, is that the Dell Inspiron Mini 9—a $300 netbook—has display with better "overall hue accuracy" than the $1999 MacBook Pro, which is "one or two steps below a good desktop display." BTW, Rob loves the Mini 9 so much he calls it "a workflow-altering experience."

His full assessment of every display is definitely worth reading, even if you're not a photographer. [Rob Galbraith, Image: Rob Galbraith]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5140178&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pixel Qi Laptop Could Run for 20-40 Hours on Standard Battery]]> Mary Lou Jepsen—the XO Laptop's designer and OLPC's CTO before defecting and founding Pixel Qi—has even grander ambitions for new laptop project than hitting a mythical $75 pricetag. Pixel Qi is working on a laptop will be able to run on a standard for 20 to 40 hours, no pixie dust required.

How? It's all about the screen. Just just like she reinvented the LCD screen for the XO, making the project possible both costwise and practically (with the flip of a switch, the color LCD can switch to one that's monochrome and highly reflective, making it easy to use outside and even more energy efficient) she's trying to do it again with Pixel Qi's latest. Their incredible efficiency is what will allow the laptops to possibly run for 20-40 hours.

Obviously, she wouldn't spell out in detail what's so magical about their screens yet. In an email to PC World, Jepsen simply says that:

"At Pixel Qi, we have a new series of inventions that go well beyond the OLPC screen that we are developing right now... We can enable an increase of 5-10X battery life between charges compared with a standard notebook. This means that rather than needing to recharge your batteries every few hours, you could run 20-40 hours of use on a one charge."

However they work, we'll be eager to check 'em out when they debut sometime in the second half of next year. [PC World via Engadget]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100030&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mimo 7-inch USB Battleoid Cockpit Display Coming to the US]]> A Gizmodo reader saw the Mimo 7-inch USB rotatable, touchscreen display and he thought they were so cool that he is importing 500 units to sell them in the US. I'm not surprised, because they are extremely nice and useful indeed: You only have to connect it to a USB port and it will work as a satellite 800 x 480 screen for anything you want, from small apps—like instant messengers—to widgets—like Photoshop tools. The even better news: Mac OS X drivers are coming too.

He says he's importing the UM-710 and the UM-730, which apart from being rotatable, has touchscreen capabilities, webcam, microphone, and a built-in speaker.

Specifications
Display Size: 7"
Display Resolution: 800 x 480
Brightness: 350cd/m2
Contrast Ratio: 400:1
UM-710 Connections: USB 2.0
UM-730 Connections: USB 2.0, Audio In, Audio Out
UM-710 Functions: Monitor, Pivots
UM-730 Functions: Monitor, Pivots, Touchscreen, Webcam, Microphone, Speaker
Dimensions: 195 x 97.5 (UM-730: 197 x 97.5)

Apparently, the manufacturer told him that they are working on Mac OS X drivers now. The UM-710 is now available for pre-order for $130, while you can get the UM-730 for $170. [The Gadgeteers]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5090694&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Solved: PSP 3000 Scan Lines Are 100% Hardware Based]]> Nobody knew if it was the software or the hardware. Why was the PSP 3000, Sony's supposed best to date with an incredible screen, suffering from interlaced images? Logic Sunrise put both displays under a 40X microscope and saw the problem immediately. Can you tell the difference? Take a mental guess and then check if you're smarter than a Sony engineer:

The problem is two-fold.

1. Pixels are arranged horizontally
2. Blue pixels are much darker on the 3000

Given these findings, the problem appears to be 100% hardware-based. So now the question is, how is it possible that Sony didn't see this problem coming? Literally? [Logic Sunrise via Maxconsole]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5071355&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Flexible OLED Display is .05mm Thick, Flaps Around in the Wind]]> Samsung has unveiled an ultra-thin 'flapping' OLED screen at FPD International 2008, demonstrating the flexibility of the display by letting it bend and flutter in the wind. At a paper-thin .05mm, the 4-inch screen is still able to create an image of 480x272 pixels, with a 100,000:1 contrast ratio and 100% reproduction of the NTSC color gamut, which is in line with most new flat panel screens on the market. If this all sounds familiar, it's because Sony made a lot of the same claims a few weeks ago — but they didn't have the balls to let their screen go all flippy-floppy in public.

Samsung couldn't accomplish this with a normal glass substrate for obvious reasons, so they pioneered a new "sputtering" technique to coat the panel with a flexible membrane. Here's how it goes: a block of the coating material is blasted with an ion gun, causing it to eject bits of itself into an thermodynamically unbalanced cloud of atoms, which then cling to and form a film on anything else in the vacuum chamber — namely, this floppety panel.

This looks like it is just a one-off, unpriced expo unit, but at least we know it's possible. This tech come interesting close in capability to Samsung's other recently demonstrated ultra-thin color display, so we might have the beginning of an confusing display tech overlap. Cool, Samsung. Please sort that out, and wake me up when my shirt is a TV. [TechOn via OLED Display]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5070275&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Are These Screens from the New Nintendo DS?]]> This allegedly leaked photo of new Nintendo DS screens has played a game of Google Translate telephone before making its way to Giz wearing red sox and green hair, but from what we can make out from the source, the big difference in the updated display is a shift in screen size from 3 inches to 3.25 inches. It's still not a widescreen system like many of us would prefer, but then again, the alteration shouldn't mess with the aspect ratio of existing DS titles, either. [Byokan Sunday via GoNintendo]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056499&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Question of the Day: What Do You Use to Clean Your Screens?]]> A big, bright, beautiful screen is a great thing—but keeping it smudge and dust free can be annoying to say the least. This is especially true with touchscreen phones and other portable media devices. With that in mind, I came up with a two section poll that involves larger screens like monitors and televisions on one side and smaller screens like cellphones and handheld game systems on the other. But both ask the same question: how do you clean your screens?

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037576&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Some iPhone 3G Screens Are Looking a Bit Yellow]]> We're not sure precisely how widespread the issue may be, but multiple reports on the Macrumors forums are bringing to light that some iPhone 3Gs are suffering from a screen with a yellow tint. While on a standard LCD the issue would probably just warrant a settings readjustment (like from Movie mode to Sports), we can't tell whether or not this is an issue with the display itself or the firmware driving the display. Is anyone else noticing that their shiny white/black iPhone 3G is looking a bit...yellow? [Macrumors]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024292&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AUO Curved Displays, Ultra Thin LCDs On The Way]]> At SID 2008 this week AUO announced the launch of curved displays, LCD panels that are just over a half millimeter thick and TFT multi-touch panels. The curved displays are said to be the first built on glass substrate (honestly, that's way over my head, but I'm sure a few of you will care). Because the display has a curve radius of 100mm, it requires a special thinning technology. But mostly, I like this thing because it just looks cool.

AUO will also release a superthin, 1.9" TFT display that is .63 mm thick, while the 8" multi-touch TFT panels that veer away from the trend of multi-touch glass panels. Can you say handheld tablet UMPCs? [InfoSyncWorld]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392248&view=rss&microfeed=true