Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #shanehurlbutcontest more →
Terminator: Salvation's Director of Photography Asks: Can You Tell the Difference Between Film and Digital?
| posts about #shanehurlbutcontest more → |
Terminator: Salvation's Director of Photography Asks: Can You Tell the Difference Between Film and Digital? |
10/28/09
I like it. #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
There's a good enough gap that experts will be able to tell the difference, but it's getting harder nowadays... which is really exciting!
I don't see pro equipment being replaced anytime soon on big productions, but still it's very nice to know that soon enough short quality pieces could be made with consumer-grade equipment.... #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
I mean, either way, if I'm watching this on a computer, it's all been converted to a digital format. #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
As opposed to professional equipment, which can cost 10 times that.
Consumer grade isn't the same as cheap. It's more about the difference between being able to buy it yourself, and needing financial support from a company or business to do so. #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
It's great to see these dSLRs making it through to big films. The BEST [prolost.com] big-sensor camera right now is the Canon 7D for $1600 (plus lenses). It has more video-specific features than the 5D, for $1000 less. The 5D is a tiny bit better in low light though (the 7D is still awesomely good in low light too compared to consumer and even many prosumer cameras).
10/28/09
Besides the best would undeniably be the 1D MKIV. The 7D is just "merely" the cheapest priced of the bunch ;) #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
Incidentally, the 5D Mark II is a pro camera as many professionals trust this camera to earn an income, myself included. The most expensive camera does not a pro-camera make... By the same token, the 7D is a pro camera. #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
The 1D is not the best deal for video. It's the best for pics, but not for video. The *only* thing it does better is that it has less rolling shutter effects. But everything else is better overall in the 7D/5D, especially when considering the prices involved. #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
The sensor size is not a big deal considering the added features, especially if you have the right lenses. The $1000 of difference is simply too big to justify the better low light support. #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
I'm not knocking the 7D, it's a great tool, but the 5D outpaces it in low light and sensor size which are a couple of very critical parameters that should not be dismissed so easily. You seem to be video focused and that's fine, but disregarding what the 5D offers? That's a bit short-sided.
BTW, for some inside info from Canon on the 5D Mark II's quirks and birth (and corrects assumptions people have made about the 5D's video): [www.digitalcinemasociety.com] #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
Anyway, I am very happy with the 5D MKII but I am also primarily using it for photographing.
The 7D (as far as I have seen) produces less sharp (blurrier) video compared to the 5D MKII. It could, of course, all come down to skill. #shanehurlbutcontest
10/28/09
10/28/09