Anything that requires a user to wear gloves or glasses is junk that will swiftly be relegated to obscurity in a scrap heap. Such novelty junk has been around for years and nobody wants it because it doesn't accomplish anything. I'd love to see the day where standardized Direct Neural Interfaces are de rigueur for the majority of typical computing applications. Unfortunately, the typical generational techno-inertia that we see is likely to be drastically compounded when it comes to tech involving surgical procedures. We already suffer buyer's remorse shortly after we buy the latest video card or CPU. How much worse will it be when it involves surgical procedures that fiddle with brain tissue, or optic nerves?
For these reasons, and many more, I foresee screen technology (whether LCD screens or projectors of a sort) remaining the standard for many, many years to come. We're social animals, and sharing the view is part of what we love. If anything, I see displays becoming larger, with higher resomolutions, and being easily "painted" onto walls. Anything else seems like pipe dreams inspired by 80s cyberpunk fiction (which has not aged well.) #singularity
@met2art: Yeah! If they have to wear anything that sits on their face or clips onto their ears or that they wear on their wrist or...
wait, that stuff is working and people do want it. especially bluetooth headsets and wireless headphones. they just have to be reliable and cheap. #singularity
@met2art: I disagree. How often do people share their cell phone displays with others besides showing a photo? Not often. I think future cell phones will still have displays, but they'll be three inches in diameter and be complemented by transparent eyepieces like the Lumus PD-18.
I think displays like those will catch on quickly when the price comes down enough. People will be won over having 800x600 resolution today or 1024x768 tomorrow. #singularity
@tylerbrainerd: Earpieces for phone calls aren't in the same category. Telephone conversation always has been, by and large, direct to the ear since its inception. Bluetooth is simply an extension of the standard way people use their phones... having the conversation privately directed to their ears. The fact that it is wireless isn't revolutionary, nor is the fact that it is smaller. The basic function it performs has not changed at all, and it doesn't preclude one from performing other tasks by imparting limitations on perception of one's surrounding.
Moving from a LCD monitor to a privately viewed headmounted display is a radical shift in usability that places enormous limitations on the product. It puts more burden on the user with little practical benefit, and hinders the performance of other tasks. This is why no headmounted display has ever caught on as a practical alternative for daily use of a computer or portable computing device. #singularity
@Neimo: Perhaps not everyone shows their phone screens to other people all the time, but it's a tremendous convenience. I'd wager that people show their screens to others more often than they'd imagine. Adding complimentary display tech is fine A screen is indispensable to show a photo to a friend, quickly check a map, glance to see the time, quickly look up a phone number, or read a quick text or email. Putting on a pair of glasses to do any of that would be very annoying. Increasing the resolution won't solve the inherent lack of need for such a niche product. It also adds cost without adding much useful functionality.
Perhaps for some games, or private movie viewing on an airplane, or extremely specific industrial or military use... but for general consumer use, I see almost no practical benefit of wearable glasses displays (like the Lumus PD-18 you mentioned) as a prevalent screen replacement technology. I've yet to be given a solid counter-argument for this, and apparently, neither has the consumer public. (This isn't to say, as a gadget lover, I wouldn't want to try a pair... but they'd always be a novelty, and useless for my daily computer needs as an artist, writer and sometime-musician.)
On the other hand, perhaps there will be a major revolution in head-mounted displays that weigh less than an ounce, can't be lost, don't drain battery power and have super high resolution, and don't make everyone look like a reject from an 80s sci-fi flick. When and if, perhaps everyone will want a pair so they can finally get some practical use of their cellphones, which have always been hindered by restrictive 2D display technology. #singularity
@met2art: Well, as technology progresses and things continue to be miniaturized, it may not be long before we can manufacture wearable displays which are no larger than conventional glasses. As for showing others your screen, if the tech were prevalent enough and bound to a standard such as bluetooth then perhaps the user could live stream their screen to whoever wants to see it. #singularity
@met2art: Not everyone has a smartphone and not everyone has to have high resolution glasses that augment reality and make reading webpages or navigating far easier. Also people who lose their glasses all the time shouldn't get these when they're available.
Depending on what kind of artist or musician you are, you might find them capable of augmenting your work in interesting ways. For example a camera in the glasses could track two blank pages on a music stand and overlay the notes. You wouldn't have to turn the pages. #singularity
the mouse and the keyboard are interesting devices, not unlike, say, the steering wheel.
they do more to accomodate the inherent limitations of human anatomy than take advantage of it.
even the concept of the GUI falls into that category. it's modeled around simply making something accessible for humans. it's current form is obviously better than its original form, but inevitably, our limits limit IT.
imagine if you could do computation without going through the physical middleman of your eyes, ears, and hands for input and feedback. it's the next logical steps, but i wonder if it's not a terrible idea to leave some limitations in place.
in a world where to think it is to do it, i could see people getting seriously hooked on brain based computing. information/stimulation addiction may well be a reality in a few more years.
i mean, look at how helpless some modern people feel when rudimentary technologies like electricity or long distance communications are suddenly unavailable. i believe there is even a psychological term for trauma caused by a sudden absence of technology.
now imagine you've been jacked into a cerebrally interactive computing system on a constant basis since you were say, 5, and you're 30 now, and it goes off. #singularity
Remember this? It's from 2000 or so - the Xybernaut Poma. Wearable Windows CE device, for about $1500. If these little suckers caught on, we'd probably have heads-up displays a lot more mainstream and probably nice wearable i7s in our pockets. #singularity
I say weave a giant flexible organic led screen into a womans tank top and then apply some augmented Reality software to it... if there is a reason, boobs are it! #singularity
I can't wait to see what Apple designs for this sexy future. I bet it will be more stable than Microsoft's with fewer Digital STDs. However, it might be more difficult to "eject" your peripherals when you're done, if you know what I mean.
@Software_Goddess: I must apologize for being so recklessly unclear and, while I believe an explanation of the joke's not too subtle subtext may dissolve any humour it once contained, I shall attempt to clarify it for you. You see, I hoped to make a jest about the annoying prompts that surface in the Mac OS when one attempts to eject a disk (or disk image) while it is still in use by a program. At it's heart, this joke was meant to imply humorously, though of course rather absurdly, how this relationship might be applied once a person's penis or vagina becomes a peripheral to the computers in the above described physical/digital sexual interplay of software and hardware; and I do mean HARDware, am I right?
P.S. I will not explain what I hoped to connote about the associate of hardware and erect penises in that last sentence.
@met2art: At least then she'd be poised to rise up and destroy them from the inside. Once our life support systems become Twitter-equipped, our extinction is imminent.
@SacGamer: I’d rather embrace a real man. I get it… the other nerds who come to Giz are all enthused about this because cyber sex is better than no sex. I get it…
11/11/09
11/12/09
@Software_Goddess: That's Billy Zane! #singularity
11/11/09
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn #singularity
11/11/09
For these reasons, and many more, I foresee screen technology (whether LCD screens or projectors of a sort) remaining the standard for many, many years to come. We're social animals, and sharing the view is part of what we love. If anything, I see displays becoming larger, with higher resomolutions, and being easily "painted" onto walls. Anything else seems like pipe dreams inspired by 80s cyberpunk fiction (which has not aged well.) #singularity
11/11/09
wait, that stuff is working and people do want it. especially bluetooth headsets and wireless headphones. they just have to be reliable and cheap. #singularity
11/11/09
I think displays like those will catch on quickly when the price comes down enough. People will be won over having 800x600 resolution today or 1024x768 tomorrow. #singularity
11/11/09
Moving from a LCD monitor to a privately viewed headmounted display is a radical shift in usability that places enormous limitations on the product. It puts more burden on the user with little practical benefit, and hinders the performance of other tasks. This is why no headmounted display has ever caught on as a practical alternative for daily use of a computer or portable computing device. #singularity
11/11/09
Perhaps for some games, or private movie viewing on an airplane, or extremely specific industrial or military use... but for general consumer use, I see almost no practical benefit of wearable glasses displays (like the Lumus PD-18 you mentioned) as a prevalent screen replacement technology. I've yet to be given a solid counter-argument for this, and apparently, neither has the consumer public. (This isn't to say, as a gadget lover, I wouldn't want to try a pair... but they'd always be a novelty, and useless for my daily computer needs as an artist, writer and sometime-musician.)
On the other hand, perhaps there will be a major revolution in head-mounted displays that weigh less than an ounce, can't be lost, don't drain battery power and have super high resolution, and don't make everyone look like a reject from an 80s sci-fi flick. When and if, perhaps everyone will want a pair so they can finally get some practical use of their cellphones, which have always been hindered by restrictive 2D display technology. #singularity
11/11/09
11/11/09
Depending on what kind of artist or musician you are, you might find them capable of augmenting your work in interesting ways. For example a camera in the glasses could track two blank pages on a music stand and overlay the notes. You wouldn't have to turn the pages. #singularity
11/11/09
they do more to accomodate the inherent limitations of human anatomy than take advantage of it.
even the concept of the GUI falls into that category. it's modeled around simply making something accessible for humans. it's current form is obviously better than its original form, but inevitably, our limits limit IT.
imagine if you could do computation without going through the physical middleman of your eyes, ears, and hands for input and feedback. it's the next logical steps, but i wonder if it's not a terrible idea to leave some limitations in place.
in a world where to think it is to do it, i could see people getting seriously hooked on brain based computing. information/stimulation addiction may well be a reality in a few more years.
i mean, look at how helpless some modern people feel when rudimentary technologies like electricity or long distance communications are suddenly unavailable. i believe there is even a psychological term for trauma caused by a sudden absence of technology.
now imagine you've been jacked into a cerebrally interactive computing system on a constant basis since you were say, 5, and you're 30 now, and it goes off. #singularity
11/11/09
Looks cool, but how far away are we from this? #singularity
11/11/09
We've had wearable computing for ages.
Remember this? It's from 2000 or so - the Xybernaut Poma. Wearable Windows CE device, for about $1500. If these little suckers caught on, we'd probably have heads-up displays a lot more mainstream and probably nice wearable i7s in our pockets. #singularity
11/11/09
09/16/09
ALL IS FULL OF LOVE!
Edit: i see i'm very late to the party.. damn u interwebz!!! :D
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
No, I’m sorry, I don’t know what you mean. Please explain.
09/16/09
P.S. I will not explain what I hoped to connote about the associate of hardware and erect penises in that last sentence.
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
Millions of years ago into the future, this kind of shit will get boring, and so mankind will look to the next level of sexual nirvana...
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
@Bertone77: Close, but you didn't break the meme density record.
09/16/09
Yo Dawg does this meen I can haz hardrive uploaded with trojan to prevent chocolate rain?
09/16/09