I was going to say that myself. Though, without the block quote that I can't seem to get to work. And, regardless, it implies invisible to SONAR detection.
While sonar for ships seems like a obvious application, I'd buy clothes made out of this in a heartbeat. I've always wanted to be one of those people who could just slip into a room unnoticed, without making a big ruckus and knocking things over. A full body suit made out of this material could go a long way to helping me realize that dream.
@OMG! Herpes!: This won't stop you from making noise; it'll just stop you from hearing anyone else as all their sound waves bounce off of you. Unfortunately, your dream is still a long ways off... until they find a way to reverse puberty.
@spannu: At least I won't be able to hear them snicker as I walk in dressed like the robot from Lost In Space.
@SoaringDisbelief: @shopperciti.com: Nothing insidery about it. It's an homage. Normally, I'm a nonconformist, but when it's for a good cause, what the heck.
Best deduction I've heard of for where Atlantis could really be is off the coast of Cuba. It's the only location that doesn't require doing the "if we ignore this one criteria, everything fits" dance.
@thatoneguy: could be, north of the location of the weird square thingies there is the location of sunken ship that downed 11th of July 1942. according it was called U-136. and then further north there is the wreck of U.S.S. Commodore Jones which sank May 6th, 1964.
if you turn on the sunken ship layer in google earth and fly to the coordinates in the picture on this post you will see all that info. It may of well been a place where alot of treasure from these sunken ships ended up.
It's just a sloppy scan of the area. Whoever did the sonar scan there used too large a grid pattern, the lines you see are gaps in their data. That's all this is... don't you guys watch Discovery / History / National Geographic channel?
Those are likely the path of the boat that was doing the surveying, and they're not capable of mapping directly below them (when using sonar). So those areas are just left blank and filled in with the artificial blue color.
05/30/09
05/30/09
You assume that's a coincidence.
05/30/09
05/30/09
05/30/09
05/30/09
05/30/09
This is what happens when we have commenters on geek sites - eventually one sneaks in that actually thinks about this stuff.
Well, I raise your smartiness with an official definition:
Oh, sure - I had to take the third definition listed, but that is beside the point. Suck it Mr. Horses!
05/30/09
I was going to say that myself. Though, without the block quote that I can't seem to get to work. And, regardless, it implies invisible to SONAR detection.
05/30/09
05/30/09
05/30/09
05/30/09
05/30/09
@SoaringDisbelief: @shopperciti.com: Nothing insidery about it. It's an homage. Normally, I'm a nonconformist, but when it's for a good cause, what the heck.
05/30/09
05/30/09
02/23/09
I found another, much larger sunken/lost city!!1
[maps.google.com]
02/22/09
02/22/09
02/22/09
02/21/09
02/21/09
if you turn on the sunken ship layer in google earth and fly to the coordinates in the picture on this post you will see all that info. It may of well been a place where alot of treasure from these sunken ships ended up.
02/21/09
02/21/09
I beg you pardon? sonar traces? Since when do sonar traces leave friggin CANYONS on the surface they're tracing?
02/21/09
Those are likely the path of the boat that was doing the surveying, and they're not capable of mapping directly below them (when using sonar). So those areas are just left blank and filled in with the artificial blue color.
02/21/09
02/21/09
02/18/09
02/18/09
02/18/09