<![CDATA[Gizmodo: sonar]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: sonar]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonar http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonar <![CDATA[Scientists Nearing Creation of Sound Cloak, Breaking Laws of Physics]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.While some work toward an invisibility cloak, University of Illinois professor Nicholas Fang is taking steps to create a similar material, only for sound, that could, for example, make ships invisible to SONAR. To successfully do this, of course, requires we break the laws of physics. But, you know, whatever.

I'll let the experts explain:

Using conventional lenses, it's not possible to focus light waves or sound waves to a spot size smaller than half the wavelength of the light. To get around these limitations, a lens must refract, or literally bend light backward. No naturally occurring materials have a negative index of refraction, but some materials carefully designed in the lab, called metamaterials, do.

Fang, a mechanical science professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, is using an array (pictured above) of specially shaped, water-filled cavities in a piece of aluminum, which supposedly work together to refract the sound by resonating in a particular way. It's all sort of unclear, and nobody has yet figured out how to get around that whole wavelength issue, but this could be the start of even crazier stealth technology, which is always fun to see—or not see. Get it? Because it's stealth. [Technology Review]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5273167&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Atlantis Found on Google Earth, Official Explanation Is Dubious]]> The image you see above is purportedly traces of the ruins of the Lost City of Atlantis, found on Google Earth. Let's weigh the evidence for and against, and see what we can conclude.

Conclusion 1: This Is Atlantis, Dammit!

The enigmatic lines were found under the sea off the north-western coast of Africa. This location is awfully close to one of the spots Plato, Legendary Smart Dude, had pinpointed as a possible resting place of Atlantis. In addition, the site is about the same size as Plato described. And if we accept Google's explanation, why is this the first such grid we've seen, in this very suspicious location?

Conclusion 2: It's Not Atlantis, Dammit!

Google claims that the lines are remnants of the sonar traces left by boats as they surveyed the area. Plus, Plato described Atlantis as being designed as a series of concentric circles, not a grid. Sub-argument: Plato's description of Atlantis was fictional, and the entire internet is really bored.

I think the arguments speak for themselves. ATLANTIS IS OBVIOUSLY REAL! [CNET, Google]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5157949&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Stealth Tech Blamed for International Sub Crash, French Crew Unaware They'd Hit Anyone for Days]]> How could two submarines end up colliding in the middle of the ocean? British military types are blaming excessive stealthiness, and the French claim they didn't realize what had happened for days.

A Royal Navy source told the Times:

It is remarkably difficult to detect a modern submarine with sonar and we work very hard with our own submarines, as do our allies, in making them as quiet as possible so they are not detectable.

And he's serious about that—even after realizing they'd hit something, the French crew couldn't tell what it was. They wrote the object off as a shipping container, only to find out that they had actually collided with another submarine upon docking three days later, after the government had deduced the collision from routine information exchanges with the British.

The problem was that both submarines use passive sonar to map out their surroundings, which doesn't give away their location with the 'pings' of active sonar, and is somewhat less sensitive. Without these 'pings', it was nearly impossible for either sub's passive sonar to detect the other's, leading to the collision and subsequent confusion.

In reality, the whole thing was a bit more subdued than initial reports (or our imaginations) led us to believe. The subs, which were traveling very slowly, just sort of bonked into on another, and the only critical damage to either vessel was to the French sub's sonar system. [Times Online]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5155593&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Wind Turbines Murdering Bats By Popping Their Lungs]]> On the list of ways to go, having your lungs explode is definitely on the gnarlier side. Too bad for bats in treehugging locales, though, because that's what's happening to them, due to a pretty serious error with their awesome echolcation systems crossing with the seemingly benign forces of Bernoulli's principle put into motion by the turbines' huge spinning blades. Ouch all around.

What happens is the bats' internal echolocation, which tracks movement, attracts them to the blades of wind turbines, which presents another fairly obvious problem. But a University of Calgary researcher, puzzled by bats dying off in large numbers around wind farms in southern Alberta has found that those that don't get cut down by the blades (surprisingly only 50%) are actually dying from exploded lungs, or barotrauma; the low pressure areas around the spinning rotors, as explained by our friend Bernoulli, cause the bats' tiny air sacs to burst. Even those that do get knocked out of the sky by the blades have their lungs popped beforehand—of the 188 dead bats in the study, 90% had barotrauma as the cause of death.

I'm thinking this is going to have to remain one of those problems without an immediate solution. Hopefully the bats will evolve to realize that the massive spinning turbine blades do not equal a tasty insectoid meal. [New Scientist, Photo: Zeusandhera]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041634&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Megatorpedo Sinks Destroyer in One Hit]]> This is a US Navy Spruance-class destroyer sinking in mere minutes after being hit by the latest version of a Mk 48: a heavyweight torpedo which, as you can see in this video, can wipe a whole ship out of the water in a single strike. This version, developed by the US and Australia, has new sonar enhancements that make it an "effective weapon in shallow water and in a countermeasure environment." The footage was taken to demonstrate its capabilities during the Rim of the Pacific 2008 naval exercise. Obviously, with frightening success (at least for someone who is looking to go to NYC in a freighter ship soon.) [Ares and BBC]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5030589&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Asus Xonar U1 USB Audio Device Supports Hardware Acceleration For Gaming]]> Although the ASUS Xonar U1 may look goofy, it promises quite a lot of features in its cone-shaped body. Among them are a high quality digital to analog converter, EAX and DirectSound hardware acceleration, 5.1-channel audio, a bundled array microphone, ambient noise suppression up to 20db, and a built-in headphone amp. No pricing or availability yet, but only Vista and XP support seem to be included. Sounds pretty great for laptops without decent hardware processing on board (which constitutes a good percentage of laptops out there). [Laptop Logic]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307716&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sonar Blu-ray Laser: How They Make It]]> We recently told you about Wicked Laser's new Sonar model, a pocket laser made from the Blu-ray diode (ripped from the still-beating heart of a Blu-ray DVD player).

Those mad scientists over at Wicked Lasers provided some pictures of the process. For those sensitive to the graphic misuse of A/V equipment, parental discretion is advised.

_wicked_laser_sonar_1.jpg
_wicked_laser_sonar_2.jpg
_wicked_laser_sonar_3.jpg
_wicked_laser_sonar_4.jpg
_wicked_laser_sonar_5.jpg
_wicked_laser_sonar_6.jpg

Upgrades.

Making the Sonar [hacked gadgets]
Product Page

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217104&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bat-Bot Knows Agapanthus from Dianthus]]> It doesn't fly, but this Bat-Bot has sonar and can distinguish one plant type from another. What's more, the ears move around like a real bat's. Which means that this research from the Active Perception Lab at the University of Antwerp in Belgium will at the very least lead to a Furby upgrade in the near future.

Biomimetic Bat-Bot [Treehugger]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=122620&view=rss&microfeed=true