Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@dragon:ONE: I agree, there should have some sort of program that lets you upgrade 1 year before the end of your contract, but you pay slightly more for the phone
@Gundem: really it doesnt make sense as to why they got rid of it... because if they still had that option then they would had sold alot more 3gs's then they did. Because all of the fanboys upgraded to the 3g, but they couldn't upgrade to the 3gs.
@reluttr: EXACTLY. I wouldn't mind paying a little more for a Tilt2 earlier than having to wait it out until 2011 for any chance of upgrade (they say I can upgrade 'early' to iPhone 3G... on the same date in 2011 as my regular upgrade.)
Of course, the other route for us WinMo users is to fake out enough hardware/warranty replacements that they just decide "screw it, we'll send you a Tilt2".
Since from what I've seen, that's what most Sprint users are doing, after all, with their Touch Pros, and coercing Sprint to give them TP2s.
@Kaiser-Machead: You realize that there are more people on AT&T who are willing to get something other than an iPhone than people on T-Mo who get Android phones....
I, for one, am extremely glad to see that there's a high possibility that the X10 might be AT&T's first Android phone.
@WingedGenius: Seconded. While I have been less than thrilled with the set of Android phones T-Mo's gotten (really? the CLIQ is the best we can do?), AT&T's got nothing. And as much as I dislike AT&T, more Android exposure is better for the platform as a whole. Sprint and Verizon both have solid Android phones (Hero, Droid). If AT&T just ended up with a CLIQ or something, well, that's not exactly a great Android flagship.
Then again, I was personally waiting for something a little more rugged to come to T-Mo to replace my G1. Or just wait til my contract is up and go back to Verizon. ;-)
Again and again Gizmodo posts their outrage of unlocked phone prices. This article is extremely ignorant. OBVIOUSLY this phone is going to be subsidized on many different carriers. Just because it might not in the US doesn't mean anything. *ALL* (GSM) phones have a off-contract price comparable to the X10's.
Firstly, no one buys nice phones off-contract, so this is not even an issue. And as I said, if you do buy a fancy phone off-contract, they're all going to cost this much.
Want to know how much an iPhone costs unlocked? The 32 GB 3GS costs US$811.
6K is an average retail price in sweden sans contract. But it will be no doutly cheaper in many other countries due to lower taxes, profit margins etc. An apple iphone is 9k is sweden without a contract to give you some idea.
In all fairness, they do cost quite a bit to make and keep in mind that this is off contract. I'm pretty sure the 3GS costs just about as much off-contract.
@PurpleMonkeyDishwasher:: Yeah, it's a lot but it's not really that outrageous. After all, it does have some killer internals, even if some folks are skeptical about the design.
@PurpleMonkeyDishwasher:: Yep, I was just about to say that. Just checked, they were about 950 to 1050 without a contract. So 880 for a 1 Ghz phone is surpising only because it is so cheap. I'd except this to be subsidized down to about the 150 range.
Btw, I doubt the plastic exterior will make the final cut for the device.
@PurpleMonkeyDishwasher:: Actually, 6000 Swedish kronor is just slightly cheaper than the off contract price of a 3GS 16GB or a HTC HD2 in Denmark right now.
I assume that prices are about the same in Sweden, so it's really not that shocking.
Even despite the so-so videos, I'm still cautiously optimistic about this phone. I think with a little more optimization, it could end up being a killer phone. The only near deal breaker for me right now is the lack of a physical keyboard, but if SE manages to deliver in the end, I may overlook that and get one of these to replace my (much beloved) G1.
Edit: but of course, that all also depends on whether or not I can get it at a very reduced price on contract through T-Mobile.
@tande04: Yea..but just sayin, the whole world's got an iPod (i think..) and probably some kind of phone anyways. Just thought if it is worth shelling out extra for an all-in-one. Which ain't so ideal actually coz if something goes wrong, everything goes wrong.
But then again wifi IS an issue and it'd be nice to be on 24-7.
HMMMMM....Ok I guess it's fine to hold onto 2 media devices. MY BAD.
I've always kept both for just that reason. I keep a few songs on my phone but not really for dedicated listening, just to have them for here or there. There are people that go with just the phone but I don't think thats the only reasoning behind this phone. Its got more going then just the media.
If SE has brains, (which unfortunately they lack) they can't price the phone high, it should be around $500-$600 mark. If they don't, then they're going to miss out on sales. I've steered clear of SE's phones already a long back since I got burnt with UIQ3 and the rest of their proprietary nonsense. It'll take a whole lot of research and convincing for me to ever go back. Moreover, this phone has very little internal memory. Where's all those 8mp images and videos going to go? C'mon, if you can't put a hard drive in there by now, then you're R&D is sleeping on the job.
@benjijk001: I agree but I think your price tag is too high.
I still think Sony needs a subsidized phone on a carrier in the US more then they thought.
There have been a number of SE phones that I find very appealing. I'm just not going to plunk down half a grand on one to get an unlocked version. Yes, its a great way to go if you can but the reality of the US market is not only that most people can't, they don't. Part of it could just be consumer confusion. Part of it is just the way the system works here. You need a new phone you go to a (carrier specific) phone store. Its starting to change a bit more and the fact that Best Buy got in on the multiple carriers and recently the unlocked is nice but its still not there.
@tande04: Price tag is too high? Are you serious? Did you even bother reading the specifications?
It has an 8 megapixel camera.. Built in. My blackberry 8900 has a 3.2 and takes amazing pictures, so having an 8 mp camera built into a phone is worth 1-150 alone.
And the processor? 1ghz on a PHONE?
Again, my 8900 has a 512mhz, so this phone has double the clock speed.
And what about the display resolution?
The 8900 displays 480x360px, The x10 displays 800x480
@otko: Like the other conversation we were having though I don't know if its an end all win for Sony though. Sony needs a US flagship carrier phone. They've shown time and time again they're getting closer with the hardware and the software, they just need the name recognition now. I'd be amazed if many people even know that sony makes cell phones in the US.
I imagine they'll do something like Nokia is doing with the n900. Offer up an unlocked one for the people that really want to go that way but really put a push out for a carrier subsidized phone.
@tande04: That would be ideal. I could see that being a very smart move for SE. Nobody ever says "Hey, how about that new Sony Ericsson phone". I would be very happy to make this my next phone if it were to land on T-Mobile. I've always liked the Xperia line-especially being that HTC really built them. I don't like how chunky it is but you can throw that in the list of non-deal breakers if it's picked up and subsidized. That big screen, the Nexus on top of Android-it would be a sweet fight for mothers love between the Droid and the X10.
I really like it, but it'll never make it here. No carrier will pick it up, which means it will be super expensive. It's bulky and most people want a little bit of space in their pocket along with their phone, and now that Android has been launched in some way on 3 of the 4 carriers, there won't be that much of a demand for this outside of the people that know about it, which is the tech community in general.
@otko: i'd generally agree with your point but the fact that they specifically mention they want it on a carrier gives me hope that someday I'll beable to touch and afford one.
@tande04: I'm basing most of my opinion off of what the Xperia's have meant to people here-not picked up and not mentioned much after release. However, those were WinMo so this could be their ticket off that awful island.
@otko: Even their not WinMo phones are pretty hard to come by state side on a carrier. I had high hopes for the Idou but even at the time I was pretty sure I'd never see one.
Turns out I was right, I'm hoping this one doesn't turn out the same.
I think its more of a SE thing than a carrier thing. Even the original Xperia was a pretty lusted over phone (though it was flawed). I'm sure any carrier would have loved to have it. I don't know how aggressively they ever shopped around the other 'X' phones or the Idou but I get the impression they didn't. It the same with how Nokia has largely viewed the US market. Its take it or leave it not lets reach an agreement. I think both have now realized they have a lot to gain by playing the carrier game a little better.
11/21/09
11/21/09
@#$%#@ upgrade cycle.
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/22/09
Of course, the other route for us WinMo users is to fake out enough hardware/warranty replacements that they just decide "screw it, we'll send you a Tilt2".
Since from what I've seen, that's what most Sprint users are doing, after all, with their Touch Pros, and coercing Sprint to give them TP2s.
11/21/09
11/21/09
I, for one, am extremely glad to see that there's a high possibility that the X10 might be AT&T's first Android phone.
11/21/09
Then again, I was personally waiting for something a little more rugged to come to T-Mo to replace my G1. Or just wait til my contract is up and go back to Verizon. ;-)
11/21/09
will not work.
edit, if it is the 1700 band i am not sure, i know most of the world uses a 2100 that is not compatible with t-mobiles 3g,
11/19/09
Firstly, no one buys nice phones off-contract, so this is not even an issue. And as I said, if you do buy a fancy phone off-contract, they're all going to cost this much.
Want to know how much an iPhone costs unlocked? The 32 GB 3GS costs US$811.
Don't believe me? Here: [store.apple.com]
Just type in "6288 HKD in USD" in Google and they'll give you a conversion.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
Btw, I doubt the plastic exterior will make the final cut for the device.
11/19/09
I assume that prices are about the same in Sweden, so it's really not that shocking.
11/19/09
11/19/09
Edit: but of course, that all also depends on whether or not I can get it at a very reduced price on contract through T-Mobile.
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/19/09
But then again wifi IS an issue and it'd be nice to be on 24-7.
HMMMMM....Ok I guess it's fine to hold onto 2 media devices. MY BAD.
11/19/09
I've always kept both for just that reason. I keep a few songs on my phone but not really for dedicated listening, just to have them for here or there. There are people that go with just the phone but I don't think thats the only reasoning behind this phone. Its got more going then just the media.
11/18/09
11/18/09
I still think Sony needs a subsidized phone on a carrier in the US more then they thought.
There have been a number of SE phones that I find very appealing. I'm just not going to plunk down half a grand on one to get an unlocked version. Yes, its a great way to go if you can but the reality of the US market is not only that most people can't, they don't. Part of it could just be consumer confusion. Part of it is just the way the system works here. You need a new phone you go to a (carrier specific) phone store. Its starting to change a bit more and the fact that Best Buy got in on the multiple carriers and recently the unlocked is nice but its still not there.
11/19/09
It has an 8 megapixel camera.. Built in. My blackberry 8900 has a 3.2 and takes amazing pictures, so having an 8 mp camera built into a phone is worth 1-150 alone.
And the processor? 1ghz on a PHONE?
Again, my 8900 has a 512mhz, so this phone has double the clock speed.
And what about the display resolution?
The 8900 displays 480x360px, The x10 displays 800x480
The 8900 costs 4-500 dollars.
So, I think 5-600 is more than fair.
11/19/09
I'm not alone.
11/18/09
When I look back at all the gadgets I used, surprizingly it's the ones I was more "meh" about that ended up being used the most...
11/18/09
*crossingfingers*
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
I imagine they'll do something like Nokia is doing with the n900. Offer up an unlocked one for the people that really want to go that way but really put a push out for a carrier subsidized phone.
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
Turns out I was right, I'm hoping this one doesn't turn out the same.
I think its more of a SE thing than a carrier thing. Even the original Xperia was a pretty lusted over phone (though it was flawed). I'm sure any carrier would have loved to have it. I don't know how aggressively they ever shopped around the other 'X' phones or the Idou but I get the impression they didn't. It the same with how Nokia has largely viewed the US market. Its take it or leave it not lets reach an agreement. I think both have now realized they have a lot to gain by playing the carrier game a little better.