<![CDATA[Gizmodo: sound card]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: sound card]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/soundcard http://gizmodo.com/tag/soundcard <![CDATA[Glowing Vacuum Tube Is Actually a USB Sound Card]]> From the vaults of Brando comes this retro glowing vacuum tube that's actually a little USB sound card.

It's got both audio in and out, and could actually be kind of useful in certain situations. I know in my clumsier younger days, I once accidentally kicked an audio cable that was plugged into my computer's audio out port, thoroughly destroying it, and bought a similar doodad because it was cheaper than getting my laptop repaired. At $32, the "Tube Delight" could probably serve that same purpose, albeit with added garishness. [Brando via DVICE]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5305109&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The RIAA May Be Forcing Laptop Manufactuers to Disable Stereo Mix Recording]]> After a frustrating few months of searching for a solution to the audio problems he encountered while ripping on-screen video with his Dell laptop, a ripten editor discovered that others were experiencing the same issue—and that the problem was not confined to Dell laptops. Apparently, the lack of a sound card Stereo Mix recording option is to blame—and numerous forum threads have suggested that the RIAA has put pressure on laptop manufacturers like Dell, Gateway and Pac Bell to remove it.

After posting this information on ripten, a Dell representative chimed in to say that the lack of a sound card Stereo Mix option was most likely due to an issue with laptops running XP, and that a driver existed to correct the problem. However, it is still not clear whether the driver works for all Dell computers or why the option was disabled in the first place. Nor does it address the possibility that the problem may not be confined to Dell products alone. Naturally, random forum threads do not confirm RIAA involvement with Stereo Mix as a fact—but it does have that slimy, fishy vibe we have come to expect from them. With that having been said, have you experienced similar problems? [ripten]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5022726&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Conclusion: Creative Backs Down Against Driver Modder, Reinstates Posts]]> The story of Daniel_K vs. Creative reaches a temporary conclusion as Creative reinstates the deleted forum posts by Daniel that helped other users get their sound cards working under Vista. The company did this as a result of angry forum and blog posts (some here as well), mostly all siding with Daniel.

On the one hand, Daniel says "They publicly threatened me, just to show their arrogance. They were sarcastic, ironic and asked me if I wanted something from them, as if I were expecting something. It was my protest against them and would like to see how far it would go."

On the other hand, Creative does have a legal right to protect their software, and if they want to force users to upgrade in order to get proper functionality, it's their right to do so (even if it is somewhat of a dick move). Daniel himself admits that he crossed the line, both with asking for donations and this:

Reversing ALchemy was also wrong, I know. But I reiterate, what is the point of improving ALchemy and changing for it, when it requires an improved driver? It was my protest against Creative.

To Creative's credit, they do realize the error of their ways and are being more acceptive to new forms of development. But Daniel's not without his faults here, which seems to be something glossed over on recent accounts of the situation. In the end, the posts are back up and people can go ahead and get their cards working on Vista, which is probably the most important thing any of us will take away from this mess. That, and the fact that John Stamos has aged quite well. [The Register]

Creative's statement:

We have read the strong feedback about Creative's forum post regarding driver development by Daniel_k and other outside parties. Creative's message posted on our behalf by our Company spokesperson tried to address our concern about the improper distribution of certain software which is the property of other companies. However, we did not make it as clear as we would have liked that we do support driver development by independent third parties. The huge task of developing driver updates to accommodate the many changes in the Vista operating system and the extensive testing required, including the lengthy Vista certification requirements for audio, makes it very difficult for Creative to develop updates for all past products. Outside developers have been very helpful to Creative and our customers by developing updates for many of our Sound Blaster products, and we do support and appreciate these efforts. This however does not extend to the unauthorized distribution of other companies' property. We hope to work out a mutually agreeable method for working with Daniel_k in supporting his efforts in driver development. Going forward, we are committed to doing a better job of working more closely with third parties to support their development for our products and our customers.
]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376286&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Portable Semi-7.1 USB Soundcard]]> If you don't feel like lugging those 7.1 surround sound speakers everywhere you go, this may be the perfect device for you and your laptop. The USB 7.1 channel sound adapter will emulate a 3D sound environment, includes a mic input and it is no bigger than a couple batteries.

Damaged sound card? Or perhaps you just want to get your hands on one of the slickest and sexiest gizmos yet to join the USB revolution? Then read on, because you're going to love this one...
Ha, slickest and sexiest. Right. $40.

Product Page [Via ubergizmo]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=220174&view=rss&microfeed=true