I don't know much about magnets in space or the whole math thing but cant we use a giant magnet to collect all the metal bits and bolts. Or perhaps a very fine net to sweep around the planet to remove all the garbage around our planet. I apologize for the question public school systems suck at teaching about these things .... well they just suck at teaching period!
@Mr_Biggles: Most of the stuff satellites are made of is nonmagnetic. If the net was strong enough to catch an object going 17000 miles an hour, they'd build the space station out of it.
How about space garbage men flying around space garbage trucks? They could scoop the junk up and then sling it into a burn on re-entry trajectory. I'd take that job.
Hell you don't even need people up there. Life support costs to much. Put a bunch of drones up and crowd source their operation out as a videogame. I'll do it all for $2 billion plus cost overruns and Per Diem. The game sales would be gravy.
@StupidSimple: You can't "shoot the debris down", it just makes more debris. You'd have to capture it manually somehow and bring it down or push it higher(high enough to escape the earth's gravity).
@Jux: It's still early in the program...once the appropriate task forces, committees, sub-groups, and marketing people have met; a suitable acronym will be released.
yes...could you imagine a hunk of metal going crazy fast in zero gravity hurtling towards you? Its a pretty dangerous job, being an ISS astronaut. Just another way they can get hurt out there.
@gotcheeze5793: You know you would be like trying to swim if you saw it coming. Almost like I imagine people falling w/o a parachute flapping their arms.
I read the other day an article about ideas being passed around on ways to clean up junk in orbit. A couple of ideas were discussed: lasers fired into space to change the trajectory of debris so that their orbit would collapse into the earths atmosphere and sending up rockets with water cannons that would shoot the debris out of orbit.
So here's my idea, which seems easier and more cost effective but I'm not a scientist so I welcome any critiques. I think building a projectile system on the moon would be best. Since, in space, mass is not important to force as it would be in a gravitational pull, a turret-like projectile system on the moon could fire very small projectiles at space junk, knocking the junk back towards Earth to burn up on reentry. The projectiles could be maybe the size of marbles and made of compacted moon dust or rock (for dust, would need to be combined with some binding agent to keep it from falling apart). Make it solar powered (assuming such a device would be stationary, large reserve batteries could be provided for those times the moon is behind Earth) and add a small rover for harvesting the material to make the projectiles with and the entire machine would be self-contained and could be remotely controlled. This would readily take care of smaller debris but could potentially take care of larger debris as well, so long as the trajectory is carefully calculated to minimize potential landfall damage upon re-entry.
@spittingangels: It's an interesting concept. A laser would be more practical since you would only need to harvest energy and not matter. To avoid blinding any people, the laser would only fire at the debris as it rounded the horizon so a miss would just shoot past the earth. Of course, the cost savings of implementing this on the moon rather than the earth would probably be more than offset by the cost of getting all this to the moon in the first place.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/08/09
09/03/09
Hell you don't even need people up there. Life support costs to much. Put a bunch of drones up and crowd source their operation out as a videogame. I'll do it all for $2 billion plus cost overruns and Per Diem. The game sales would be gravy.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
btw, video lists the speed as 17K MPH, not 70K. Hauling balls, nonetheless.
09/04/09
I'm thinking: Space Trash Fence Ubiety (STFU)
09/03/09
09/03/09
"Tom Sawyer, you tricked me."
09/03/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/23/09
03/12/09
03/12/09
So here's my idea, which seems easier and more cost effective but I'm not a scientist so I welcome any critiques. I think building a projectile system on the moon would be best. Since, in space, mass is not important to force as it would be in a gravitational pull, a turret-like projectile system on the moon could fire very small projectiles at space junk, knocking the junk back towards Earth to burn up on reentry. The projectiles could be maybe the size of marbles and made of compacted moon dust or rock (for dust, would need to be combined with some binding agent to keep it from falling apart). Make it solar powered (assuming such a device would be stationary, large reserve batteries could be provided for those times the moon is behind Earth) and add a small rover for harvesting the material to make the projectiles with and the entire machine would be self-contained and could be remotely controlled. This would readily take care of smaller debris but could potentially take care of larger debris as well, so long as the trajectory is carefully calculated to minimize potential landfall damage upon re-entry.
03/12/09
03/12/09