@OMG! Ponies!: I've got an incredible amount of experience at being slothful. I am well qualified to lounge around doing nothing. I have an advanced degree in inattentiveness and authored several authoritative texts on daydreaming. I presently sit on the Board of Directors at Sealy. Well, I don't really sit; more like I recline. And the board is a pillowtop.
Also, I have set several records in doing nothing in particular and have started a successful business that entails me just sitting on my duff.
@OMG! Ponies!: I planned to major in Pillownautics in college, but when I turned in all my papers on time in Intro to Pillownautics (aka Pillowgut), the prof told me I just wasn't cut out for it.
@IceCoffee: No, because he left them nothing but a shoddy casing full of used pinball machine parts. Besides, I think that by that point, they'd be pretty pissed.
If Pu-238 is a byproduct of the weapons manufacturing industry, and that industry has, in the last 50 years, created over 20,000 nuclear weapons, what were they doing with the Pu-238 they generated for all those years?
Why don't we forgo the dangerous, damaging radioactive stuff in favor of, in my opinion, more favorable options like the NSTAR engine currently powering Deep Space One?
this is awesome! I always thought that a rolling ball design would be the best bet for robot movement, but this really overcomes the hurdle (no pun intended) of getting stuck in harsh terrain.
@Shub-Niggurath: i agree. nasa should jump at the opportunity to adopt this thing. they'd have a ball with it. they could probably even improve it by bouncing around a few ideas, rolling with a few innovations, you know, just continually round out their design.
06/03/09
I only lie at one job.
06/03/09
06/03/09
Also, I have set several records in doing nothing in particular and have started a successful business that entails me just sitting on my duff.
06/03/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
So where in the hell is the rest of the Pu-238 they created over the 50 years of weapons manufacture?
05/07/09
Difference between Uranium 235 and 238 and Plutonium-238.
Pu-238 isn't used in bombs - Pu-239 is.
"The isotope plutonium-238 (Pu-238) is not capable of undergoing nuclear fission easily, although it will undergo alpha decay." (wikipedia)
05/12/09
If Pu-238 is a byproduct of the weapons manufacturing industry, and that industry has, in the last 50 years, created over 20,000 nuclear weapons, what were they doing with the Pu-238 they generated for all those years?
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
(if someone can figure out that reference, I'd be incredibly impressed)
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
Need some Pu-238, huh? Perhaps I can be of assistance...
05/07/09
12/08/08
12/08/08
12/08/08
12/08/08
in a moon or martian environment, these would kick ass. on earth, it wouldn't take long for a weed to tangle in the ball frame.
12/08/08
12/08/08
12/08/08
12/08/08
12/08/08
can it avoid the noid?
12/08/08