You miss the point when you call the test subjects gullible. The point was not to deceive but to measure the contribution of patients expectation of a treatment effect. This is a powerful tool and is worth understanding better. Patients who feel positive about a therapy nearly always do better than those who don't. Patients who feel negative about the same therapy will often have little or no benefit. That "treatments" like homeopathy and chiropractic, which have no scientific validity, are often perceived effective by patients is a testament to the power of the placebo effect and of patients expectations of a therapy. We need to respect it and apply it better in traditional medical therapy.
"Instead what the lab coats did was use an inactive cream and reduce the heat to a tolerable level, at least on the first go."
You didn't even read the article properly, Rosa. They toned down the heat at first to impose the idea that the cream actually works to the participants. #placeboeffect
@Mr.MellonCollie: "Basically, the volunteers were expecting to feel less pain, just as they did in the tolerable heat test. The very basis of the Placebo Effect."
If only I wasn't so suspect about medication, maybe the placebo affect would work way better for me.
By the way, love the new system. Not a huge fan of the way the tags are now, but the fact that there are notifications is awesome. Just awesome. #placeboeffect
@Duckspwn: You, sir, are in a better position to benefit from placebo effects than you are (most certainly) aware. Bare with me, but having the understanding that the placebo effect is a (mysteriously) scientifically effective method of treatment in many cases, it reasons that your own consciousness has greater affect on the consequence of your personal experience, which is surprisingly inspiring, and not surprisingly confusing. Either way, you are aware, my friend. End! #placeboeffect
@tsroark: With a bit of precision, one could even make complex or fun designs on the skin. There would be run-down skanky "parlors' where one could go to have this procedure performed where the artists, despite the foul surroundings, employ perfect aseptic technique.
Wait, wait, wait. They BROKE THEIR BACKS!? Trust me, I'm the last person to go all PETA (once ate an ostrich purely out of spite), but how the hell could that be ethically kosher!?
Also, how did they come to this discovery?
"Oh, shit! We broke their backs!"
"Uh, oh."
"Shit, man, come on! What are we gonna do? If the boss finds out, we're gonna be fired like that!"
"Uh..."
"Come on, man! We gotta do something!"
"Let's inject them with Brilliant G, G!"
"...Blue dye? How's that gonna help!?"
"Well, they'll be blue. That'd be friggin hilarious!"
@general12345:
You do make a phenomenal point. Why should we break a rodent's back if it has the possibility to allow people to walk again. That's just stupid!
That's exactly like the people against stem cell research. We could save lives, but its unethical, oh well.
@general12345: It sounds horrific, messed up, and cruel. And don't get me wrong, it is. But this is what laboratory animals go through so that we can have modern medicine, unfortunately.
Spinal injuries aside, I totally want a blue rat now.
@general12345: are you suggesting we brake human backs? if you don't think this is ethically kosher you've obviously never seen any other experiments on animals. also you seem to lack any knowledge in scientific research - testing hypothesis not making wild guesses. Obviously someone did extensive research on the matter, maybe years before they finally got approval to test it. They don't just go scooping up field mice and bop 'em on the head.
@general12345: Actually most major spinal cord research is done on dogs. They will break the dogs neck, leave him on a table for his life until they can figure out how to fix it (and they never do). It sucks, but according to people in washignton its more "humane" than messing with single cell stem cells. But now things are slowly starting to change and people are more open to stem cell research for this kind of thing.
@general12345: Welcome to Modern Science. Unfortunately, we can't emulate biological processes or life itself in a computer yet. Something has to suffer for the march of progress.
Next thing you'll do is cry that the burger I'm eating used to be a living breathing cute little cow. Grow up.
@Optimus-Prime: Yup, because killing people is much more ethical than killing animals. All in the name of science. People need to read up on adult stems cells. No loss of life, completely moral.
If you were not referring to embryo stems cells, please denote it.
@★_red3001: And people need to read on on embryonic stem cells. For some reason a lot of people seem to be under the impression that a cluster of cells less advanced than a housefly is the same thing as a human that can feel and think. Bizarre.
@general12345: Because these scientists are studying spinal injuries. If they were studying cancer, or brain injuries, they'd inflict that on the tiny creatures as well. The result? Improving the lives of thousands of people a year who would otherwise have permanent disabilities or terminal illnesses. It may seem cruel to you, but it is absolutely necessary to advance modern medicine.
So you can either reject it and its advances - literally returning to bronze age technology, or embrace it and thank god that someone has the vision to pursue this line of research.
@ludwigk: I like where you went with that. I had a difficult time in "Experimental Physiology" where I was expected to perform surgery and testing on live rats. The problem was, one may have the minimal skills required to pull an animal apart, but putting it back together, that's a different story. So, it's the long sleep for the little guys. No wonder they told us not to name them.
My Grandma said it was OK. And the worst thing she's ever done was throw moldy cheese off a balcony on a vacation to Aruba. Sooo ya... did you know that rats have three lobes to their liver, as opposed to two, like us?
@general12345: Ever see what happens when an owl, falcon or other predatory bird gets ahold of a mouse? How about when it's caught by a regular ol' house cat? Tarantula?
@balls187: }And what have we achieved with "modern" medicine? How many diseases can we cure? Sure we can treat all sorts, but none that are cured.{
...but we CAN treat them now, which we couldn't do before the research. Go ask someone with diabetes if they're glad we figured out insulin. It's not a cure, but I doubt you'll find many people who'd rather die than use it.
10/21/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
And I agree, the effect needs to be studied further in order to be applied in various therapy methods. #placeboeffect
10/17/09
You didn't even read the article properly, Rosa. They toned down the heat at first to impose the idea that the cream actually works to the participants. #placeboeffect
10/17/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
By the way, love the new system. Not a huge fan of the way the tags are now, but the fact that there are notifications is awesome. Just awesome. #placeboeffect
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
I think i've seen this guy on TV before.
07/28/09
07/28/09
I'd get a whole group of people together who have had this procedure done, we'd march down the street chanting, "We're Number 1".
07/28/09
07/28/09
He has blue balls.... poor little rat.
07/28/09
Why has nobody ever though of this before? Why aren't there legions of punk kids running around in technicolor? Or Neon?
07/28/09
Ahh, but what to call it...
07/28/09
07/28/09
Also, how did they come to this discovery?
"Oh, shit! We broke their backs!"
"Uh, oh."
"Shit, man, come on! What are we gonna do? If the boss finds out, we're gonna be fired like that!"
"Uh..."
"Come on, man! We gotta do something!"
"Let's inject them with Brilliant G, G!"
"...Blue dye? How's that gonna help!?"
"Well, they'll be blue. That'd be friggin hilarious!"
07/28/09
You do make a phenomenal point. Why should we break a rodent's back if it has the possibility to allow people to walk again. That's just stupid!
That's exactly like the people against stem cell research. We could save lives, but its unethical, oh well.
07/28/09
Spinal injuries aside, I totally want a blue rat now.
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
Next thing you'll do is cry that the burger I'm eating used to be a living breathing cute little cow. Grow up.
07/28/09
If you were not referring to embryo stems cells, please denote it.
07/28/09
07/28/09
So you can either reject it and its advances - literally returning to bronze age technology, or embrace it and thank god that someone has the vision to pursue this line of research.
07/28/09
My Grandma said it was OK. And the worst thing she's ever done was throw moldy cheese off a balcony on a vacation to Aruba. Sooo ya... did you know that rats have three lobes to their liver, as opposed to two, like us?
07/28/09
Humans are no crueler than any other predator.
07/28/09
07/28/09
Cells cannot feel "pain."
Labrats, most assuredly do.
07/28/09
How many diseases can we cure? Sure we can treat all sorts, but none that are cured.
07/29/09
...but we CAN treat them now, which we couldn't do before the research. Go ask someone with diabetes if they're glad we figured out insulin. It's not a cure, but I doubt you'll find many people who'd rather die than use it.