Maybe we'll eventually see PCs and notebooks with built-in high-speed, low-capacity SSDs from which to boot (I'd love to see Win7 cold-boot in 6 seconds or whatever), with mechanical hard drives to hold our ever-increasing store of movies and porn.
Until solid-state can compete on price with spinning discs, that seems like a good compromise. At some point, I'm going to update my HTPC that way, so it boots fast from a 60 GB or 80 GB SSD, but has a couple of 2 TB drives for all my... um... legally acquired media. *cough* #fusionioioxtreme
@Kirkaiya: I had a friend ask me about this for his computer. It sounds like a really good idea to do, and I might just do it for my own computer after I acquire the funds.
@STiger: Maybe notebook manufacturers (do you read comments, Lenovo???) will start doing that for high-end models. I know I'd be willing to pay more for an onboard fast mini-SSD to boot my next ThinkPad from, with a standard 2.5" drive-bay for either a second, larger-capacity (but slower & cheaper) SSD or a fat 320GB spinning drive. Maybe someone (consumers to Lenovo, come in Lenovo...) will build it. Here's hoping! #fusionioioxtreme
Alright, I posed this question on the engadget story as well, but you gizmodoians are generally a bit more.. intelligent. Anyone know if there's an adapter that can go from one of those mini PCIE SATA SSD's for Eee PC's to a normal PCIE x1 or normal desktop SATA? (long story, but basically My fiancee's brother ordered the wrong part and we didn't notice the word "mini")
i find your enthusiasm lacking.. these are very nice drives and the price drop is huge!
the best consumer ssd's in the world are now among the cheapest, whats not to be excited about? I want one bad... oh a 320GB version is around the corner
These will replace platter drives in less than 5 years - when the price becomes more reasonable. For now, I'll stick with a Raptor if I need a fast drive.
sure, reporting blistering sequential read and write speeds gets the girls all wet, but in real world usage, random read/write is everything. Nobody's gotten close to Intel's X25 yet, despite how (by gadget terms) ancient that drive is.
@mikeborisov: That's not completely accurate. While the X25 drives cannot be touched in random write terms, other drives have already surpassed them (substantially) in random reads -- including one of Corsair's own.
Apparently, when you edit a comment, you can no longer embed some links.
I'd still rather have SSD's. As fabrication process's get smaller and smaller, they will vastly overtake the amount of data that can be stored on a magnetic platter. Plus they are more resistant to physical damage.
Plus there's a problem with this tech, since your fabricating the millions of heads like you would a memory chip or CPU, that takes up A LOT of the wafer space. So the cost for each of these drives would be around $1000, just for manufacture cost's.
It's not going to be worth it, SSD's are going to be increasing in speed quite a bit, especially when we start getting down to the fabrication processes that use graphene and carbon nanotubes.
I work in a nanotech lab and I'll tell you that it will be YEARS before you start seeing graphene and carbon nanotube-based chips being sold commercially.
11/17/09
Until solid-state can compete on price with spinning discs, that seems like a good compromise. At some point, I'm going to update my HTPC that way, so it boots fast from a 60 GB or 80 GB SSD, but has a couple of 2 TB drives for all my... um... legally acquired media. *cough* #fusionioioxtreme
11/17/09
Hell, I wish my laptop had an SSD to boot from... #fusionioioxtreme
11/18/09
11/17/09
09/22/09
09/21/09
09/21/09
09/21/09
09/21/09
09/21/09
IDE? THIS IS mSATAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!
09/21/09
09/21/09
[www.ridetheslut.com]
09/21/09
09/21/09
08/12/09
07/21/09
320gb would be nice.
07/21/09
07/21/09
the best consumer ssd's in the world are now among the cheapest, whats not to be excited about? I want one bad... oh a 320GB version is around the corner
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
Apparently, when you edit a comment, you can no longer embed some links.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/storage/2009/06/05/corsair-p256-256gb-ssd-review/6
06/22/09
Plus there's a problem with this tech, since your fabricating the millions of heads like you would a memory chip or CPU, that takes up A LOT of the wafer space. So the cost for each of these drives would be around $1000, just for manufacture cost's.
It's not going to be worth it, SSD's are going to be increasing in speed quite a bit, especially when we start getting down to the fabrication processes that use graphene and carbon nanotubes.
06/22/09
I work in a nanotech lab and I'll tell you that it will be YEARS before you start seeing graphene and carbon nanotube-based chips being sold commercially.