<![CDATA[Gizmodo: steven sinofsky]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: steven sinofsky]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevensinofsky http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevensinofsky <![CDATA[Windows Software Guru Now President of the Whole Windows Business]]> Steven Sinofsky, the amazingly competent dude at the helm of Windows 7 software development, has just been named president of the whole Windows division. He basically assumes the managerial duties of Bill Veghte, who was overseeing the business side.

Having met Sinofsky on a number of occasions, I can say that it makes total sense. He's sharp, and now that he doesn't need to focus all his managerial efforts on meeting development deadlines, it's time to put the rest of his brain to use in getting the product into distribution. My sense is, given the man's focus and drive, he was probably already making most of the key logistical decisions already.

It's weird that Veghte is being bumped at a time when sales messaging for Windows 7 is so vital. The task of marketing Windows 7 will be taken over by Tami Reller, current CFO of the Windows division, who will report to Sinofsky. Veghte's a really nice guy, and I was under the impression that some people thought he could be the next Ballmer, so I'm not too worried for him. However, it sounds like a demotion. All Microsoft says is that Veghte "will be moving to a new leadership role in the company to be announced later this year." Let's just hope it's not leader of sanitation and food services. [Microsoft]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5310487&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Windows 7 Open Beta: Why It Is (and Isn't) a Free Vista Upgrade]]> Today at CES, I met with Steven Sinofsky, Windows 7 development chief, and asked about the unprecedented free-for-all Windows 7 Beta available tomorrow to anyone who's interested. Is this the "free upgrade" people wanted?

When I asked him if it was an unprecedented move, passing out the whole operating system to anyone and everyone who wants it, he said that technology limited previous rollouts. Windows 95's beta test group was 600,000 strong, downloaded mostly from dial-up via FTP sites. He says he even remembers putting out DOS in 1992, and getting 50,000 downloads—within a day. This, though, the combination of the TechNet and MSDN subscriber downloads with the open beta for all, will dwarf those previous OS beta runs. So I asked the obvious question: Are people going to dump Vista for this, wholesale?

I can't speak for what people are going to do. What we're trying to do is involve people in the development of Windows 7 in a way that anyone can choose what their appropriate level is—hardware and computer makers who are deeply involved because that's their job, enterprise customers deciding to dedicate people to work with us at a very high bandwidth, we have other enterprise customers who want to kick the tires; we have enthusiasts—your readers—going crazy to be able to download it and that's awesome.

We have different ways we have people involved. At one extreme, they're part of the professional beta programs and they log bugs and they have feedback. And at the other extreme, all we need them to do is run the product, and their installation telemetry—things that are optional as part of the retail product are part of the beta, the telemetry, what devices you plug in and all that, and at some level, those are all super helpful to us.

I mentioned to him that one the recurring comments from the original Windows 7 walkthrough was that this should be a service pack or, better yet, a free upgrade to Vista. So I asked: Is this a free upgrade to Vista?

Technically if you have a Vista machine you can install this and it will install an upgrade. That's part of what we're letting people test. But that's not a product offering. This is an offer to test the product. I would remind readers that this is a beta product. This is not a done product. That means there are bugs in it that are in the process of being fixed, it means there are bugs we're going to discover, and we're not servicing it like a real product.

Basically, he's saying enjoy it, but know its limitations in trying to be the be-all end-all answer to your Vista problems.

If there's anything more from the interview that I need to share with you, I'll publish it tomorrow. Meantime, let us know how your Windows 7 beta experience is going. [Microsoft Windows 7]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5127024&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Windows 7 Engineering Squad Has 1000 Developers Spread Over 25 Teams]]> Steven Sinofsky, Senior VP in charge of Windows 7 development, has just posted some details on the Microsoft's Windows 7 Engineering blog on what the internal structure looks like for the upcoming OS. It sounds (at least to us) equal parts logistical nightmare and brute force "1000 monkeys at 1000 typewriters", with 25 teams divided up to an average of 40 developers per team.

The organization is divided up into 25 teams, which encompases stuff like Applets and Gadgets, the File System, Core User Experience, Find and Organize, IE, Kernel & VM, Media Center, and Security. Of course many features span various parts of the OS, and it's up to the management to coordinate between the numerous groups. What would we want to see more of? Better and smarter integration between various apps on Windows, for example having their Mail application be tied into Calendars for meeting schedules and Contacts, or making Gadgets able to access various parts of the OS. These are just two examples we came up with in as many seconds, but you get the idea. More integration. [Windows 7 blog]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039134&view=rss&microfeed=true