<![CDATA[Gizmodo: stock]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: stock]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/stock http://gizmodo.com/tag/stock <![CDATA[Godfather of Spam Sentenced to Four Years in Jail]]> A Detroit judge sentenced Alan Ralsky, a spam mastermind who headed an elaborate international organization, to 51 months in prison. Ralsky was convicted of wire fraud, mail fraud and violation of the CAN-SPAM act for his schemes.

Ralsky and his cohorts netted millions from pump and dump stock scams which were bolstered by their spamming. He pleaded guilty in June and will be serving time along with his son, who was sentenced to 40 months. [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5412068&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]> Apple Issues Update for Current-Gen iPod Nano...Barnes & Noble Giftcards Won't Buy Ebooks, Screwing Some Nook Pre-Orderers...Dell Mini 3 Officially Launched in China...Palm Stock Skyrockets After Nokia Takeover Rumor...

Apple Issues Update for Current-Gen iPod Nano

Apple quietly issued a firmware update for its newest, video-taking iPod Nano, and it's pretty minor but does fix a few problems. Audio podcasts can now be played back in Normal, Slow or Fast modes, and a few random bugs were patched (Nike+ integration, mono audio, VoiceOver). It's in Remainders because it really is a minor update—we wouldn't even bother with it except the Nano is such a ridiculously huge seller. [TUAW]

Barnes & Noble Giftcards Won't Buy Ebooks, Screwing Some Nook Pre-Orderers

Apparently Barnes & Noble's giftcards will buy you everything B&N sells—except ebooks. It's an inexplicable and irritating omission, but what makes it really rankle is that nobody seems to know about it, even those who work at the stores. Check out this story:

My wife and kids pre-ordered a nook for my birthday at our local B&N. The sales person also sold her a $100 gift card to "get my eBook collection started." When I tried to purchase a few books, I found out that gift cards can't be used on eBooks.

What a dick move! We're going to assume ignorance on B&N's part, but this is sloppy stuff, especially given our proximity to the holidays—their giftcards are incredibly popular and this will not be an isolated incident. Get it together, B&N. [Consumerist]

Dell Mini 3 Officially Launched in China

The Android-running Dell Mini 3 smartphone officially began its launch sequence today. It's been shipped out to sellers in China today, for release later this month, with a Brazil release to follow later this year. In early 2010 it should hit AT&T and Verizon—we'll see if we care by then. It's a noticeably low-key release, considering it's the first handheld in years from Dell, but it ends up in Remainders due to its current China-only status. [Electronista]

Palm Stock Skyrockets After Nokia Takeover Rumor

Palm stock skyrocketed today, with trading over 15 times heavier than normal, due to an odd rumor that Nokia would be buying the company. It doesn't really make any sense to us—Nokia is really unlikely to be purchasing a competitor to its Symbian line, and buying the beleaguered Palm would be a weird way to try to make gains in the US market. This one plops into Remainders because it's both unlikely and mere financial news, which isn't really that exciting. [Electronista]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5404533&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Apple Stock Hits All-Time High, Flouts Recession]]> Apple's stock has hit a personal high for the company at $205.04 per share, up from its previous high of $202.96 back in 2007. The company's overall value is rated at $183 billion (Microsoft is $236 billion, in comparison). [BusinessWeek]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5387272&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[SEC Examining Apple on Steve Jobs' Health Disclosures]]> The storm after Gizmodo uncovered the real state of Steve Jobs' health keeps growing. Now the SEC is examining Apple's behavior to "ensure investors weren't misled," Bloomberg reports:

U.S. regulators are examining Apple Inc.’s disclosures about Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs’s health problems to ensure investors weren’t misled, a person familiar with the matter said.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s review doesn’t mean investigators have seen evidence of wrongdoing, the person said, declining to be identified because the inquiry isn’t public.

Bloomberg News' David Scheer and Connie Guglielmo cite James Cox—a law professor at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina—to argue that the Securities and Exchange Commission is reviewing the disclosures, since they're feeling the pressure from stock holders and public opinion. Needless to say, everyone is especially sensitive to the Commision's "work" in the light of the current economic climate and the latest scandals, like Madoff's alleged $50 billion fraud.

Back in December 30 2008, Gizmodo published an article about the rapid decline of Steve Jobs' health during 2008, citing a previously 100 percent reliable source.

The report, which caused Apple's shares to drop abruptly, was immediately answered live on CNBC by the network's Silicon Valley Bureau Chief Jim Goldman, who attacked Gizmodo's reporting, calling it "unsourced garbage," arguing that investors should keep buying the stock as normal because his inside sources told him that Steve Jobs was in "perfect health condition."

Right before the Macworld keynote, Jobs confirmed the problems in an open letter to the Apple community. He said that his doctors thought they got to the bottom of his health problems—a hormonal imbalance—and he recently had begun treatment to resolve the situation. He also said he would remain as CEO of the company until his total recovery in spring.

However, on Jan. 14, Jobs admitted his health problems were worse than he previously thought and stepped down from the CEO position, with Tim Cook taking over his seat "temporarily."

Bloomberg News argues that the chain of events is making some people question the way in which Apple has handled the disclosure of information that is believed to be crucial to the future of the company and, therefore, affects its value. [Bloomberg News]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5135991&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Motorola Is Officially Junk]]> Standard and Poor's Rating Services acknowledges what Giz readers have known for a long time: They now classify Motorola as junk.Specifically, their Ratings Services cut its long-term corporate credit rating for Motorola to junk status. Last week, though, Moody's Investors Services also warned of future cuts to Moto's rating, which is hanging on two notches above junk. This all means it'll be even harder for Motorola to get cash, like for R&D or other projects. Clearly, however, none of these people have heard of the Moto Krave, which has a full touchscreen, two megapixel camera and fits right in with sports cars. [WSJ via BBG Faucet]]]> http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5103031&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Computers Screw Stock Market Even More Than It's Already Screwed]]> As if we didn't have enough with the stock market going down in flames on its own, computers have decided to screw them a little bit more and make everyone go "WTF" for a few minutes this morning. After dropping around two hundred gazillion points yesterday, today the Dow Jones industrials saw another drop of 700 points, which was suddenly reduced to 125 and then went down again. Everyone thought "rebound" for a second there, until they realized what was really happening.

The reason of the sudden swing was artificial, caused by a large chunk of computer-driven orders that pushed the values up, only to drop down again after these were processed. At least according to the Associated Press, which says that this early roller coaster was "likely caused" by these orders, which "kicked-in when prices had fallen far enough to make some stocks look like an attractive bet. But that buying reflected no lifting of the market's deep despair, and selling continued."

Oh noes. Maybe we should all cheer up and let computers run the whole thing for a while then. Or just send stocks to hell altogether. [AP — Thanks OMGponies]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5061714&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Glitch Drops Google Stock Price $200 in Four Minutes, Wiping Out $62 Billion]]> At probably like the worst time ever for your stock to plummet harder than a meteor on a collision course with Bruce Willis, a glitch knocked $200 off of Google's stock price—that's half—in the span of four minutes as the markets were closing today. $62 billion. Erased. In four minutes. The glitch has been fixed, bringing it back to the correct price of $407, but some trades actually did go through at the bargain basement price. While they'll be repealed, it shows you that it's so crazy out there even computers are going nuts right now. [TechCrunch]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5057151&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Apple Backdating Suit Settled, Jobs and Co,'s Insurance Will Pay Apple $14 Million]]> Steve and the gang already threw a party when the last federal investigator on the stock backdating case filed out of 1 Infinite Loop ("Hey, you forgot your 5-year old Thinkpad! Haha, suckers!"). But now, the remaining civil suits that were still active have been settled (with no admission of wrongdoing) for $14 million, all of which will be paid by the investment insurance coverage of the defendants—Jobs, along with several other suits and VPs. But still, since the shareholders who were the plaintiffs were suing on behalf of the company, the money will end up back in Apple's hands. Look for some boss new espresso machines and maybe a moon bounce over in Jobs' neck of the woods, thanks to the now $14-million heavier "luxuries for the exec wing" budget. [AP, Apple Insider]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048544&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Apple Backdated Stock Options Suit Dismissed, Fanboys Rejoice]]> Steve Jobs' options case has been thrown out of court. The judge let the case go since there's been no drop in the stock price as a result of the backdating. [Apple Insider]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323402&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Apple's Stock Drops 5.15%, Low Boom Count to Blame?]]> Wall Street can be such a fickle beast sometimes. Today, Apple revealed what could only be referred to as a monstrous unveiling of iPod-related material, and how do the investors repay them? With a 5.15% drop in the stock price. (Although we've done a few of our own calculations and have come to a striking realization.)

If you add the Steve Jobs boom count (1 boom, 36 minutes into the presentation) to the number of hardware announcements (5-iPhone, touch, classic, nano & shuffle), then subtract the closing day stock price at WWDC '07 ($120.19) divided by the opening day stock price ($145.12), and then finally subtract our two cents, you get 5.15—the same as the percentage drop in Apple's stock today.

1+5-($120.19/$145.12)-.02=5.15 (rounded off)

See, we can be analysts too! [AAPL]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=296868&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gene Munster Predicts $205 For Apple in 2008]]> Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster has moved Apple's stock price projection for 2009 up a whole year to 2008, making Munster's projection the highest price anyone has ever given Apple: $205 per share. Is there method to his madness? Of course. And it has something to do with our obnoxious graphic.

One thing we learned with the iPod is that when a device is game-changing, the demand will come...However, it is difficult to predict the inflection point. For example, in December 2004, Street expectations for iPod ran wild with investors anticipating 8 million iPods, but Apple only sold 4.6 million. It was feared at the time that the iPod would never go mainstream.

Conversations with investors over the past month suggest awareness of potential for iPhone units is high, but awareness of potential resulting impact to earnings is low...if Apple can sell 45 million units in CY09, the earnings power and historical multiple ranges suggest our price target is reasonable.

So as long as Munster gets the rest of Wall Street on board, he's ready to party. 45 million units sound good to everyone else? [appleinsider]]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281090&view=rss&microfeed=true