Well, what can I say? Simplicity sells.
There's one favorite Gizmodo company whose motto is exactly that.
And you know, the vast majority of computer users don't know much about dealing with wi-fi and servers, so I guess a good number would really pay extra just for the plug and play ability.
I'm only wondering how the one to one connection works... does each USB key + drive pair have an unique identification? Because if so, the signal interception argument makes sense... and is also great for users who don't know their way around configuring wireless routers and stuff...
1) Put wireless USB fob on your key ring
2) Pair it with your desktop
3) Pair it with your laptop
When you're at home, work on items on the USB fob. Save your work, grab your laptop, and go out. Get to work, open your laptop, and start working again. No need to disconnect and reconnect makes your data appear to almost be in the Cloud but without all the privacy concerns and need for constant internet connection. Drivers can be equipped to encrypt the data for local transmission, pairing codes, etc. etc.
The price is rather irrelevant since this is a 1st-gen product, eventually the prices will fall to what they are for USB fobs today, and when they do I will buy one. I'm guessing the dongle is a WUSB dongle since the majority of computers don't have it built-in yet... give it time.
@blash: You only have a 30 foot range. Unless you work from home, you aren't going to be able to access the drive from work, in which case you might as well just transfer the files to your laptop.
@ceilingFANBOY: I said put the wireless USB fob on your key ring. Do you not take your keys with you when you leave the house? Ergo your data comes with you wherever you go without going through the time needed to plug in the USB fob and transfer the files, since you're just working off the fob all the time.
Dunno why my explanation doesn't make sense to you... put 2 and 2 together please.
@blash: But you would still need the hard drive. If you have room for the hard drive, then you probably have room for a cable connecting your hard drive to your computer. That's all I'm saying. Anyway, with the hard drive being wireless, wouldn't that also mean that you would either have to plug in the hard drive to a wall outlet anyway, or take the risk of using a battery operated hard drive that could die in the middle of a file write? How is that any better than just connecting directly to your computer?
@ceilingFANBOY: Who's talking about a hard drive? Take a USB 16 GB flash memory key fob, put a WUSB chip and a LiOn battery on it, and THAT'S IT! Recharging comes from the once-a-week plugging in, induction charging... remember when you didn't have to recharge your dumb cellphone every day because it had a standby time of a month? Oh, but you forgot because you got a smartphone that goes through the whole battery in a day.
@blash: If you don't want to use a hard drive, which is what the article was talking about, and you are only using flash memory which fits on your keys, I don't really see any need for this to be wireless. It would be a lot quicker for the for the computer to connect via a USB plug and more reliable than a wireless connection. About the only use I could see for this is if you could link two or more computers to the same drive at the same time so that you could get sort of a Google Wave or Docs thing going on where multiple people can work on the same document at the same time.
@blash: The wireless technology itself is all I can find a use for. The actual implementation that is being discussed in this article is what I find fault with. Yes, I know that the first few generations of a technology may not necessarily live up to the expectations, but I feel that even with current technologies this could have been utilized in a better manner that would have better encouraged others to invest in R&D for this product. As it stands, it seems useless to the majority of people (if even people on a tech site look at it as useless, what do you think the average person is going to see in the product?). Had they instead marketed it as a tool for allowing multiple people to collaborate on a single document without the need of a network that could either be unreliable or a security risk, I feel they would have been on to something.
This is junk, and whoever buys it is a sucker, when one could get either a good USB (cabled) drive or a network drive. I can't see any situation whatsoever where this would be remotely useful compared to the alternatives
Maybe we'll eventually see PCs and notebooks with built-in high-speed, low-capacity SSDs from which to boot (I'd love to see Win7 cold-boot in 6 seconds or whatever), with mechanical hard drives to hold our ever-increasing store of movies and porn.
Until solid-state can compete on price with spinning discs, that seems like a good compromise. At some point, I'm going to update my HTPC that way, so it boots fast from a 60 GB or 80 GB SSD, but has a couple of 2 TB drives for all my... um... legally acquired media. *cough* #fusionioioxtreme
@Kirkaiya: I had a friend ask me about this for his computer. It sounds like a really good idea to do, and I might just do it for my own computer after I acquire the funds.
@STiger: Maybe notebook manufacturers (do you read comments, Lenovo???) will start doing that for high-end models. I know I'd be willing to pay more for an onboard fast mini-SSD to boot my next ThinkPad from, with a standard 2.5" drive-bay for either a second, larger-capacity (but slower & cheaper) SSD or a fat 320GB spinning drive. Maybe someone (consumers to Lenovo, come in Lenovo...) will build it. Here's hoping! #fusionioioxtreme
@OCEntertainment: Dude, I hear ya. I feel bad (on the inside) for even stating that. I wholly h8 that line but, as I said to my last GF: you've left me no choice. #wink
So... does anyone plan to pick up a copy of her memoirs? I find it interesting that this person was able to produce a 413-page book. Note the lack of a co-author named on the title: #wink
@Hello Mister Walrus: Meh. People seem to forget that politicians are generally moderately intelligent people. I mean, most of them have degrees in something. They aren't total dumbasses, so I suppose one could write a book.
I'm tired, don't criticise me too much. -_-
@DustyButt™: I would wager that elected representatives are generally more intelligent than the average voter that they represent. However, they are not comparable to the university professors or other smart people whose jobs are to analyze the government or to write books about politics.
On second thought, I don't think Sarah Palin is necessarily unintelligent - obviously some kind of manipulation was necessary to become the governor of a state. I do think that her past rhetoric implies horrifying ignorance about the world outside of her constituency. #wink
@Hello Mister Walrus: There have been some interesting studies on what types of people get elected in different societies. The US favors lawyers whereas China favors engineers. So the issue is not intelligence as much as what type of knowledge the leaders bring to the table. Sarah Palin may be intelligent, but she is clearly ignorant. Her lack of qualifications is her defining feature. That and her unnatural lack of self-doubt. #wink
The new Genius Bar system allows you to make reservations further in advance than the old one, which was limited to just a few days. #gizmodoremainders
@yule-and-bellow: No - I mean if something initially costs $100 and someone says prices are cut by 50%, this means that the new price is $50. If they say prices are cut by 100%, this means the new price is zero. If you say the price is cut by 800%, this means the new price is -$700. #gizmodoremainders
I think thats right, you can tell me if I am or not because you're first comment flew right over my head, proving you have the superior mind of us two...or google is paying people massive amounts of money to have all the data in the world put in their cloud...further inching them closer to world domination
11/19/09
There's one favorite Gizmodo company whose motto is exactly that.
And you know, the vast majority of computer users don't know much about dealing with wi-fi and servers, so I guess a good number would really pay extra just for the plug and play ability.
I'm only wondering how the one to one connection works... does each USB key + drive pair have an unique identification? Because if so, the signal interception argument makes sense... and is also great for users who don't know their way around configuring wireless routers and stuff...
11/19/09
1) Put wireless USB fob on your key ring
2) Pair it with your desktop
3) Pair it with your laptop
When you're at home, work on items on the USB fob. Save your work, grab your laptop, and go out. Get to work, open your laptop, and start working again. No need to disconnect and reconnect makes your data appear to almost be in the Cloud but without all the privacy concerns and need for constant internet connection. Drivers can be equipped to encrypt the data for local transmission, pairing codes, etc. etc.
The price is rather irrelevant since this is a 1st-gen product, eventually the prices will fall to what they are for USB fobs today, and when they do I will buy one. I'm guessing the dongle is a WUSB dongle since the majority of computers don't have it built-in yet... give it time.
11/19/09
11/19/09
Dunno why my explanation doesn't make sense to you... put 2 and 2 together please.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/24/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/17/09
Until solid-state can compete on price with spinning discs, that seems like a good compromise. At some point, I'm going to update my HTPC that way, so it boots fast from a 60 GB or 80 GB SSD, but has a couple of 2 TB drives for all my... um... legally acquired media. *cough* #fusionioioxtreme
11/17/09
Hell, I wish my laptop had an SSD to boot from... #fusionioioxtreme
11/18/09
11/17/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Mistake number two: Letting a first-year Photoshop student do your graphic design. Seriously, guys? Gradient, Outer Glow, done-and-done?
At least make the red-black gradient favor the red a little more so your gross text doesn't fade into the background there, dude.
Then again, polish a turd... #wink
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
.....Ugh. Caffeine. #wink
11/16/09
11/16/09
So... does anyone plan to pick up a copy of her memoirs? I find it interesting that this person was able to produce a 413-page book. Note the lack of a co-author named on the title: #wink
11/16/09
I'm tired, don't criticise me too much. -_-
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
1. Own up to your ignorance
2. Own up to your sarcasm
3. Cover your ignorance by saying you we're being sarcastic
The comment smacks of joke to me, but dumber things have been said before. #wink
11/16/09
On second thought, I don't think Sarah Palin is necessarily unintelligent - obviously some kind of manipulation was necessary to become the governor of a state. I do think that her past rhetoric implies horrifying ignorance about the world outside of her constituency. #wink
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
Something is wrong with this sentence... #gizmodoremainders
11/11/09
Better? Worse? #gizmodoremainders
11/11/09
11/11/09
I think thats right, you can tell me if I am or not because you're first comment flew right over my head, proving you have the superior mind of us two...or google is paying people massive amounts of money to have all the data in the world put in their cloud...further inching them closer to world domination
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
[www.rapidrepair.com] #toshibamkxx33gsg