I'm going to be honest and say that as a junior at an undergrad business school studying marketing and working on startups, those questions were about what I'd expect from Google...and honestly, the ones she posted weren't tough (although when you're under that much pressure, even a basic arithmetic problem can seem daunting). *edit* Actually now that I think about it, they're much easier than what I'd expect from Google.
I translated that whole article as "My inability to perform basic math functions and think logically wasn't good enough for Google, but it's good enough for Business Insider." #googleinterviews
I actually think I would do quite well with the more off-beat questions they asked. Although, Those kinds of questions simply cause me to ask more questions. It would only be a matter of time before I was asking more questions than the interviewer. #googleinterviews
I wonder what they're looking for. First question about the golf balls, for example: My initial thought is, duh, one golf ball could easily fit in a school bus. They didn't say "maximum number" of golf balls, and I have to assume these questions are meticulously designed.
But the reader suggested answer demonstrates an entirely different way to go about answering the question (based entirely on assumptions and guesswork).
I wonder what kind of questions they ask when they're interviewing for an industrial organizational psychology job?
Something like, "How many seemingly strange questions does it take to cause a interviewee to mentally break down?" #googleinterviews
It's called the "case method" of interviewing, and it sucks. Interviews for consulting firms like Bain & McKinsey use this method....you have to practice for them, because getting used to thinking in certain ways, using some key figures at the outset are the key to answering these questions.
I once interviewed for Bain....I got the to final round and was asked two case questions. The first was "how many pieces of mail does the US postal services process every day." Somehow, i nailed it, and actually got to a number close to the actual number (although i don't remember exactly how i arrived at it). The second case was about an airline company where I was given a couple of facts and was told to give my reasoning why the company was losing money. I asked all kinds of questions to see if I could find out something that would indicate the problem, but at the end of the day, I didn't hit on the exact reason Anyways, didn't get the job. oh welllll. that was 5 years ago. #googleinterviews
@AlphaPepper: This is generally true but doesn't really apply to Google.
At Google just about everything is done by engineers/developers or people with that mindset. Sometimes even basic decisions are made using algorithms rather than design or marketing knowledge.
Many designers/marketers find this concept horrifying, but it often works quite well for Google. They can push out a variety of different solutions to different customers, and then use the one that works the best in the end. #googleinterviews
@AlphaPepper: But, I would seriously doubt the intelligence of someone who could not answer that particular question that they asked her. Granted, interviews are stressful situations, but when you're interviewing 50 people for the same job, you can afford to drop the people who can't handle the pressure. #googleinterviews
meh. they aren't all that interested in your answers, only at how you arrived at them. except the math stuff, which was pretty basic, even if she was blindsided a bit. their process is arguably brutal, but at least they aren't ambiguous about what it is they are looking for. they didn't get to where they are by hiring people just to be nice.
when it comes down to it, though, i'd rather work for apple.
@Hello Mister Walrus: To be fair, no one's really thinking clearly during a high-pressure job interview. It was good of the guy to giver her time to respond.
While we're being fair, the "I vowed to switch to Yahoo for life" was childish, moronic, and frankly if I were Google, that alone would confirm I shouldn't have hired her. Sorry, toots. Looking for a job is tough business. You don't get to start your own little boycott at every rejection. And a high-profile company isn't evil just because the interview is hard. That's how they get high-profile. #googleinterviews
Years ago I saw some footage taken from a reporter's camera who had wound up recording his own death. I don't think he was using a rifle stock mounted camera, but in the hot zone, and in a US uniform, I don't think it would make that much difference safety-wise.
@ChibaCityCowboy: Ernie Pyle is the war photographer whose last photo is of his dead body, shortly after he got killed by a Japanese machine-gunner during WWII, but there's another similar instance that happened more recently. In 2006, independant documentarist Brad Will was filming footage of the violent armed conflict in Oaxaca, Mexico when he was shot and killed. The video reportedly shows two armed gunmen in the distance, and right after one or both of them fire shots the camera was dropped. The belief is that Will actually filmed the shot that killed him. Both of these stories only show half of the story, and it's not the same half. One shows just the dead body after the fact, and the other shows just the killing act.
@Steeplebomb: Yeah, in a way. But if you actually look at Pyle's photo, you can't really tell that he's not just sleeping or unconscious. There's supposed to be a bit of visible blood coming out of his mouth, but it's a B&W photo that was shot over 60 years ago. The image quality isn't exactly the greatest. And with the video, you can't actually tell _why_ the camera was dropped unless someone tells you.
And when you get right down to it, neither of these men was taking a walk through the park. Both were trying to document the real horrors that take place very far away from our mostly-secure little corner of the world (in the entire last century, Pearl Harbor, 9/11, and the Unabombing are the only three comparable acts of violence that I can think of that have been perpetrated on US soil).
Why would the CIA be making a presentation to the president about eco-technologies that can reduce our dependence on foreign oil?
I mean, I can understand the CIA being interested in eco-tech, but that sounds like the kind of thing they'd just write a briefing document about (a briefing document that nobody would ever read).
Sony gets to charge a brand premium because, over the years, it cultivated a reputation for high-quality electronics. What you're buying when you buy Sony is piece of mind. You're buying the knowledge that the product is well-designed and well-made.
It might not seem it lately but brand lines like WEGA and Trinitron carried with them a cachet. Why a $1000 Sony camera? Because next year, Sony will still be around.
@badhatharry is just a small town girl livin' in a lonely wo...: I do sit-ups using my 200 lb. 34" Sony TV as an anchor. I wedge my feet under the 75 lb. console that I bought to put the TV on. It was the only one I trusted wouldn't break under the weight.
@OMG! Ponies!: I think that's what I have. It's old, and I can't remember the size. Moral of the story is: it's old, and don't try to move it with a hangover.
Why do I get the feeling this guy doesn't actually NEED that microphone. It looks like he just hung a curtain up in the hallway near the bathroom and had his friends hold up some flashlights.
@homerjay wants Boston Legal back!: Some Simpsons episode. Homer says it to Lisa. Or Bart. Pretty sure it's Lisa, though. Don't remember which episode.
11/14/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
But the reader suggested answer demonstrates an entirely different way to go about answering the question (based entirely on assumptions and guesswork).
I wonder what kind of questions they ask when they're interviewing for an industrial organizational psychology job?
Something like, "How many seemingly strange questions does it take to cause a interviewee to mentally break down?" #googleinterviews
11/13/09
I once interviewed for Bain....I got the to final round and was asked two case questions. The first was "how many pieces of mail does the US postal services process every day." Somehow, i nailed it, and actually got to a number close to the actual number (although i don't remember exactly how i arrived at it). The second case was about an airline company where I was given a couple of facts and was told to give my reasoning why the company was losing money. I asked all kinds of questions to see if I could find out something that would indicate the problem, but at the end of the day, I didn't hit on the exact reason Anyways, didn't get the job. oh welllll. that was 5 years ago. #googleinterviews
11/13/09
11/13/09
At Google just about everything is done by engineers/developers or people with that mindset. Sometimes even basic decisions are made using algorithms rather than design or marketing knowledge.
Many designers/marketers find this concept horrifying, but it often works quite well for Google. They can push out a variety of different solutions to different customers, and then use the one that works the best in the end. #googleinterviews
11/13/09
11/13/09
when it comes down to it, though, i'd rather work for apple.
11/13/09
"Maybe…$70,000?"
Something tells me that it wasn't that the questions were hard, but this person wasn't being particularly bright at the time. #googleinterviews
11/13/09
While we're being fair, the "I vowed to switch to Yahoo for life" was childish, moronic, and frankly if I were Google, that alone would confirm I shouldn't have hired her. Sorry, toots. Looking for a job is tough business. You don't get to start your own little boycott at every rejection. And a high-profile company isn't evil just because the interview is hard. That's how they get high-profile. #googleinterviews
01/30/09
01/31/09
Ernie Pyle is the war photographer whose last photo is of his dead body, shortly after he got killed by a Japanese machine-gunner during WWII, but there's another similar instance that happened more recently. In 2006, independant documentarist Brad Will was filming footage of the violent armed conflict in Oaxaca, Mexico when he was shot and killed. The video reportedly shows two armed gunmen in the distance, and right after one or both of them fire shots the camera was dropped. The belief is that Will actually filmed the shot that killed him. Both of these stories only show half of the story, and it's not the same half. One shows just the dead body after the fact, and the other shows just the killing act.
01/31/09
wow. morbid.
01/31/09
Yeah, in a way. But if you actually look at Pyle's photo, you can't really tell that he's not just sleeping or unconscious. There's supposed to be a bit of visible blood coming out of his mouth, but it's a B&W photo that was shot over 60 years ago. The image quality isn't exactly the greatest. And with the video, you can't actually tell _why_ the camera was dropped unless someone tells you.
And when you get right down to it, neither of these men was taking a walk through the park. Both were trying to document the real horrors that take place very far away from our mostly-secure little corner of the world (in the entire last century, Pearl Harbor, 9/11, and the Unabombing are the only three comparable acts of violence that I can think of that have been perpetrated on US soil).
01/30/09
01/09/09
I mean, I can understand the CIA being interested in eco-tech, but that sounds like the kind of thing they'd just write a briefing document about (a briefing document that nobody would ever read).
01/09/09
It might not seem it lately but brand lines like WEGA and Trinitron carried with them a cachet. Why a $1000 Sony camera? Because next year, Sony will still be around.
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09