Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/25/09
11/25/09
Blame the people who grab the licenses to rebroadcast the shows in your country for not having a similar site (or working a deal with Hulu).
And I'm not even going to begin discussing the value of viewers to advertisers being less if they're distributed internationally, since you can't focus your ad campaign nearly as tightly...
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
@valkilmerisawful:
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
Thanks for the links!
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
And don't talk to me about Torrents - those people are the equivalent of tweakers cooking up meth in their garages.
11/24/09
But if they want to keep me from seeing their videos so badly - mission successful. Now Hulu and their brand means nothing to me...
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
Is anyone else here too ADD for television? I usually can't be bothered to stop gaming to watch a TV show the exception being when my wife wants to watch a show together. I predict a continued downturn of TV viewers and a continued upturn of gamers. TV isn't going to be doing itself any favors by resisting the internet enabled world.
11/24/09
Frankly, the current content out there is not all that good, certainly not good enough to pull me away from scrounging for input on the internet.
11/24/09
example for demonstrative purposes but you get the idea.
what channel/times shows are in is a mystery as well.
then the archaic wait 1/2 an hour or an hour for something you are interested in to come on also drives me up the wall.
the internet has spoiled me.
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
Oh, and the "American Idol/So you think you can dance/I got talent wut bout u??!" people? They can have the exorbitant fees and constant commercial interruptions.
11/24/09
11/24/09
I'm not quite ready to abandon ship just yet. TPTB behind Hulu have a history of being dicks. But what could we expect from the crew that, until recently, has held an ironclad grip over television content. They're uncomfortable, writhing in a pool of their own irrelevance and it shows. And yet, Hulu still has shows online. They're trying. Not hard and certainly not well, but they're trying.
I want to hear how the possible paid Hulu service would work. As stated before, if it would allow more access to shows (and more reliably), remove idiotic restrictions from set-top boxes, and for a reasonable price, I'll jump on board.
Hulu is treading on thin ice, though. It's as though they've seen how popular their concept is and, rather than get excited at new business, they've decided to cower in fear.
Come on, big content. Grow your balls back.
11/24/09
11/24/09
AT&T's U-Verse interface is junk, and the days of needing to be bound to a broadcast (as opposed to maybe a simple release) schedule are ready to be long gone.
My wallet and I are eagerly awaiting the day a content provider has the guts to make such a system.
11/24/09
As long as people are willing to pay something there can be hope. If people aren't though, there's every reason for content providers to kick and scream like little kids who don't want to take off their favorite outfit after wearing it for a week.
11/24/09
11/24/09
Interestingly, while some content may get "scrapped due to the transition", content creators are separate (though tied) to content providers. And the folks who have the drive to create media enough will find some venue. The idea that one can't make money on the internet is a false one, and I've seen too many examples to the contrary. And I believe that if the big networks won't step up and eventually fall by the wayside (incredibly unlikely, and I hope it doesn't happen), someone will be there to fill the gap.
You're correct that the devaluing of content is a problem. I think folks should be reminded that it's important they value the people who make the videos/music/images they enjoy. I just don't feel that locking down content even farther, placing a label of "potential enemy" on your viewers is the best way to encourage growth.
Hulu has the chance to go either way with this choice, and I hope they make the right one.
11/16/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
Meanwhile, Boxee's greatest strength is with streaming video. Sadly, the one thing both of them lack is Hulu, so that's not so great. Still, Boxee will give you access to more streaming video than you knew existed out of the box. If that's of interest to you, start with Boxee. #boxeebox
11/12/09
And the apps and the web streaming is great. Its awesome having a pandora app in a media center that just works. #boxeebox
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
If this policy has changed, I'd be more than happy to hear it. But as I recall Hulu integration was, at best, unreliable. #boxeebox