So it might not shatter with a gigantic force thrust upon it but I would assume it would flex back far enough to still do considerable damage to your eyes.
Edited by BergenCountyJC can edit his name? at 11/18/09 8:42 AM
BergenCountyJC can edit his name? was starred
BergenCountyJC can edit his name? was unstarred
@BergenCountyJC can edit his name?: It would be kind of cool to see where they take this kind of test. Like what glasses material WOULD it take to stop a speeding bullet?
@Bigbadbikernerd: Best movies Vin Diesel ever did, can't wait for more Chronicles.
Unfortunately, if the video game is canon, this ability is bestowed by a voice in his head, not the doc (Pope Joe just fixed his arm). It's apparently part of his Furyan abilities. I like the "shine job" explanation better. #transitioncontacts
@FigNinja: Nike used to make colored contacts specailized for the sport you are playing. They have been discontinued though. You don't want to dim *all* light when you are playing a sport. You want to filter out colors.
Example: For golf nike had grey-green contacts. Green light was filtered out so you could pick up the white golf ball better. #transitioncontacts
Once they "isolate the photochromic material to just corneal region of your eye", they can start working on colored dyes to turn your iris's into spinners. #transitioncontacts
@Gann: And then people start trying to one-up each other by getting bigger and bigger rims. Soon we'll see people with eyes the size of old-school vynil LP records. #transitioncontacts
@Gann: Yes, exactly like that. With animations for moods. and when in idle they show a screensaver. maybe a hamster solling in a wheel. #transitioncontacts
"the Wrap 310 also features true 16x9 widescreen, twin high resolution displays"
HOW high resolution?
"428 x 240"
EDIT: apparently they're 640x480. it's still:
a bunch of horse shit.
i've mentioned it before, i've got prototype glasses by inviso (formerly siliscape) from 2001 running 800 x 600 that were set to retail for $250. in 2002. 1024x768 was a mere 6 months to a year of R&D away. you can guess why the money got pulled out. 2001. ahem. you can run Windows through them and not have any problems seeing what you're doing. colors are great, no flicker, great contrast.
so why? why, 8 years later, why the f*$% hasn't the technology been matched? what's the holdup?
"The Wrap 310 will feature twin high-resolution video displays, project a 55-inch screen and include removable noise isolating earphones."
Obviously it doesn't "project" anything and the display isn't "55-inch". I'm not sure why they can get away with saying that when what they mean is just that the display is equivalent in size or angular extent to a 55 inch display viewed at a distance of... what exactly? 55 inches at ten feet would not be very impressive.
@jdale: So say you are sitting on an airplane. Pull out these glasses and start watching a movie from your ipod whatever. The screen appears equivalent to a 55" screen from ten feet away. So its not impressive to get that experience sitting on a plane of all places? Now replace that with sitting in a car, or train, or where ever. Sure it may not seem that impressive if you are sitting at home, but for a personal viewing in places that it is not logical to have a 55" screen... its pretty damn impressive to me.
@Forsakenchild: My point is really that it is a meaningless measurement. If it feels better imagine I said 55" at 100 feet. Would you pay for that? No, it would be worthless. You'd be better off watching video on the tiny screen of your iPod Nano. But since they haven't specified a distance in their press release who knows?
55" at 10' is about 22 degrees of view. At 5' it would be 43 degrees of awesome, at 15' it would be 15 degrees of lame.
11/19/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
"No, doc, I can't see anything out of that eye; I have a flawless, bulletproof lens embedded into my ocular nerve."
11/18/09
optic nerve
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
Unfortunately, if the video game is canon, this ability is bestowed by a voice in his head, not the doc (Pope Joe just fixed his arm). It's apparently part of his Furyan abilities. I like the "shine job" explanation better. #transitioncontacts
11/10/09
11/10/09
Example: For golf nike had grey-green contacts. Green light was filtered out so you could pick up the white golf ball better. #transitioncontacts
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/11/09
@Grinning Kestrel: Ah, but none of those are animated. #transitioncontacts
11/13/09
09/15/09
HOW high resolution?
"428 x 240"
EDIT: apparently they're 640x480. it's still:
a bunch of horse shit.
i've mentioned it before, i've got prototype glasses by inviso (formerly siliscape) from 2001 running 800 x 600 that were set to retail for $250. in 2002. 1024x768 was a mere 6 months to a year of R&D away. you can guess why the money got pulled out. 2001. ahem. you can run Windows through them and not have any problems seeing what you're doing. colors are great, no flicker, great contrast.
so why? why, 8 years later, why the f*$% hasn't the technology been matched? what's the holdup?
09/15/09
Obviously it doesn't "project" anything and the display isn't "55-inch". I'm not sure why they can get away with saying that when what they mean is just that the display is equivalent in size or angular extent to a 55 inch display viewed at a distance of... what exactly? 55 inches at ten feet would not be very impressive.
09/15/09
09/15/09
55" at 10' is about 22 degrees of view. At 5' it would be 43 degrees of awesome, at 15' it would be 15 degrees of lame.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
I'd be interested in something like this if they could get the resolution up to at least 720p, though.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
07/11/09
Here is the Brando $99 version:
http://www.rainydaymagazine.com/RDM2006/RDMHomeAug2006.htm#Brando
Here is the Oakley $30 version:
http://www.rainydaymagazine.com/RDM2006/GearNGadgets/July2006/O_ROKR/RDMGG_O_ROKRFirstLook.htm