So, if there was a blog dedicated to the aviation industry, what would it be called? "Boeing Boeing"! Get it? HAHAHAHAAaaa..aaa...
Ok, I'll go away now.
Man, I would pay good money to fly supersonic. And for me, it wouldn't be about getting to the destination faster. It would be the experience. I feel all warm and fuzzy.
Great pic. I know what supersonic means, but I am not really sure what I am seeing in the picture. It looks like the jet is tearing a hole, but I am not sure what IN.
What happens in a case like this is that the air is compressed as the aircraft flies through it, in this case I'll discuss the leading corners of the wing tips. That then leaves an area of low pressure behind the compressed air, and that low pressure allows water vapor to condense.
This can actually happen at transonic (at or near the speed of sound), so it's not necessarily an indication of absolute supersonic speeds.
@Curves: This is why I am not afraid to ask questions (even if I think they may be stupid ones). Here at Giz, someone always has an answer. Thanks for the info guys.
@Darkest Daze: @Redwraithvienna: Well, this comment would have been incredibly unfathomable 100 years ago. damn. Hell, I was incredibly unfathomable 100 years ago. I just blew your mind. Admit it!
Hey, well at least there's the British Airways Concorde sitting by the Intrepid, though the engine cowlings are empty, and one of the powerplants is sitting in a glass box next to the jet.
Just because it was faster doesn't mean it was better technology.
The space shuttle is newer than Rockets cone-shaped command modules, yet it was actually a step backwards in capability. Increased cost and lower payload.
In the long run it didn't actually save us money, and we now literally have to re-invent the rocket to get back to the moon.
07/18/09
Ok, I'll go away now.
07/18/09
Nice one, HMW! +1
07/18/09
A: Not everyone's been on a Concorde! Heyyyooo!
07/19/09
Very nice! :D
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
Je suis écossais. Vous êtes écossais?
07/18/09
07/18/09
Please don't write aviation articles.
07/18/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
No, a series of traingular pointed wings with increasing spacing between them.
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
What happens in a case like this is that the air is compressed as the aircraft flies through it, in this case I'll discuss the leading corners of the wing tips. That then leaves an area of low pressure behind the compressed air, and that low pressure allows water vapor to condense.
This can actually happen at transonic (at or near the speed of sound), so it's not necessarily an indication of absolute supersonic speeds.
06/28/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
04/08/09
04/08/09
04/08/09
The space shuttle is newer than Rockets cone-shaped command modules, yet it was actually a step backwards in capability. Increased cost and lower payload.
In the long run it didn't actually save us money, and we now literally have to re-invent the rocket to get back to the moon.
04/08/09
It worked fine (and safe) for 30 years before the freak accident. It's because of the noise it's not allowed in any airport. Except like 3.
04/08/09
04/08/09