@deadrobot: Twister: Finger Edition? Or maybe Penis Edition... but multi-touch might be difficult with your pee pee. Plus it's your friend - not cool...
I know with certainty that the iPhone can already recognize four fingers. Can it do more? Maybe, I don't know. Rather, the question should be: SHOULD it do more on such a tiny screen? Is there a friggin point to having 10 independent inputs on a 3.5 inch screen? I mean, if this were a Microsoft Surface or something, I'd recognize the need to have as many distinct points of input as possible, but, let's be real now, it's not. We're working with limited space.
@HumungaCowabunga_GitEmSteveDav...: with great power comes great responsibility.... (meaning there will be a whole lot more dropped touch screen when someone develops an app needing 6 fingers)
@TheSonOfKrypton: I kind of agree with you-I don't need to have things that can only be done with my whole hand on my cell phone-I'm usually using it while walking, so the more stuff that I can do with one finger/thumb, the better.
That being said, that crumple gesture is pretty cool-I could see having fun deleting my email or getting rid of notes if that was an option. I'd probably get bored of it fairly quickly, though.
@TheSonOfKrypton: I think an amazing possibility for the Surface is if it could recognize separate people. So there can be multiple people doing different things on the Surface. Like a bonfire... everyone gathers around. Fingerprint recognition would be cool... "unlock" your workspace with your fingerprint so only you can access your email etc.
@HumungaCowabunga_GitEmSteveDav...: The definitive evidence that Synaptics is doing things just because they can will be when they develop the 12 finger multitouch.
@TheSonOfKrypton: 10 fingers is not that outlandish. It's some of the next generation stuff they're working on - 10 fingers plus tongue, liver, and spleen - that makes me wonder what kind of practical applications they have in mind.
@Hi, I'm God: There is research into developing finger print recognition. I think that is one of the ideas behind apple's patent of a camera behind the LCD screen. You would press your finger on the screen, the camera takes a picture of it from underneath the screen, and then can analyze your fingerprint.
@TheSonOfKrypton: Honestly, Synaptics should fix the side scrolling and 'possessed cursor' problem that drives me up the wall on my laptop. 10 fingers? No... Synaptics, we have a problem with one finger, because scrolling whilst playing flash is like force-feeding a large dose of hallucinogens and paralytics to my mouse drivers.
@Jrsy Devil's Food Cake®: oh how I miss the G4s... :::sigh::: the new trackpad and keyboard will definitely grow on you, though, if/when you end up with a newer notebook If you give it a fair chance, you'll never go back :)
@brobot: I got a black MacBook when they first came out. I returned it after two weeks for several reasons, chief among them was my dislike for the keyboard. My two favorite laptop keyboards are the PowerBook and my Thinkpad.
And before anyone chimes in about using an external keyboard, it's something extra to lug around and it defeats the purpose of having a built-in keyboard (IMO anyway).
Some of you seem to lack an adequate understanding of the patent system. The following will address that (well, at least somewhat):
1) Patents are for ideas. In other words, you claim ideas.
2) There is probably prior art (i.e., other patents) in the multitouch field, but one needs to consider a) whether one or more of said prior art has expired (in which case its assignee will be unable to sue the multitouch dude for infringement) and b) whether the claims of said prior art reads on the multitouch dude.
3) Before crying infringement, one needs to review the claims of Apple's patents. Does the multitouch dude (and/or his device) infringe those claims?
@ZAPPO1123: There are only three classes of people who think that the USPTO isn't broken:
1. Patent lawyers (who make money on the system)
2. Large corporations (who make money on the system)
3. Patent trolls (who make money on the system)
Everyone else is pretty much fed up with it.
It has long since become the domain of who has the deepest pockets and the largest legal team. It no longer serves its original purpose of protecting and fostering innovation.
In my opinion, there are only a few of the Apple multi-touch patents that should pass muster, specifically, the one's pertaining to the actual physical construction and manufacture of the touch screen. The patents for multi-touch gestures and such should fail easily due to prior art (among other things).
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
What kind of sick orgy MMORGs will we be playing?
07/22/09
07/22/09
Binary Digit-Blue!
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
That being said, that crumple gesture is pretty cool-I could see having fun deleting my email or getting rid of notes if that was an option. I'd probably get bored of it fairly quickly, though.
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
Wow.
It seems like a vocabulary could be developed of very intuitive gestures that really open a wealth of possibilities for mobile devices.
06/02/09
My trusty 15" G4 still has plenty of life left in it yet..
06/02/09
06/02/09
And before anyone chimes in about using an external keyboard, it's something extra to lug around and it defeats the purpose of having a built-in keyboard (IMO anyway).
06/01/09
It isn't hard to know where a finger is. :P
06/01/09
01/12/09
1) Patents are for ideas. In other words, you claim ideas.
2) There is probably prior art (i.e., other patents) in the multitouch field, but one needs to consider a) whether one or more of said prior art has expired (in which case its assignee will be unable to sue the multitouch dude for infringement) and b) whether the claims of said prior art reads on the multitouch dude.
3) Before crying infringement, one needs to review the claims of Apple's patents. Does the multitouch dude (and/or his device) infringe those claims?
4) The USPTO IS functioning just fine.
01/13/09
Everyone else is pretty much fed up with it.
It has long since become the domain of who has the deepest pockets and the largest legal team. It no longer serves its original purpose of protecting and fostering innovation.
In my opinion, there are only a few of the Apple multi-touch patents that should pass muster, specifically, the one's pertaining to the actual physical construction and manufacture of the touch screen. The patents for multi-touch gestures and such should fail easily due to prior art (among other things).
01/12/09
01/12/09
01/12/09
01/12/09
01/12/09
@UnexpectedEOF: Uhm your either mis-informed or lying. Apple invented multi-touch and debuted it at macworld 2007.
01/12/09