LOL!
I MADE one of these in the late 80's for a furniture design class. It looked very similar except i used fiberglass fabric and resin. Mine was sort of translucent instead of clear. Funny thing was I only got a C. They said it was derivative and too obvious.
I see the point of John Brauer, but unfortunately I can't dissociate that design from cheap ugly plastic flower vases I always see all dirty on houses with cheap furniture and graveyards.
@craighyatt: If you buy it now, it will eventually match things in your house when they get covered in clear plastic sheets that your kids won't understand the purpose of.
The tricky part will be figuring out whether or not to put a clear plastic sheet on your clear plastic table.
Acid can destroy egg cartons and so can fire. We also have machines that can turn C02 into breathable oxygen(liked used in space, or submarines).. so why do we even still need plants?
@Sean Scrooby Grube: Because plants are natural solar energy converters. You could use a machine to make O2, but you'd need to power it somehow, i.e. with huge amounts of fossil fuels/nuclear etc. Plants do this by themselves.
@Sean Scrooby Grube: Ah, another ignorant comment to indulge in. Allow me to begin by saying it will be a pleasure to dissect your comment an humiliate you in any possible way in the process. Shall we proceed?
Firstly, your charge that egg cartons are not indestructible. Your first claim under that topic is that egg cartons are susceptible to acids. Please recall that most materials are. For example, if I have a metal table and spill an acid on it, the acid will damage the table, as will a base. Your second claim involved fire. Combustion is quite damaging to many materials. If I have a glass table, the heat will destroy the table. If I have a wooden table, it will burn alongside the rest of the room. Thus, the claim that you expect egg cartons to be impervious to damage is quite unrealistic, as well as an idiotic notion that ANY table will hold up to all threats.
Your second claim is that we have no need for plants. Not so, sir. Not so. Firstly, regarding oxygen generation. These work in a few ways. Firstly, you can strip the oxygen from the CO2. However, this leaves you with byproducts. If you are using a chemical converter, you have a mess of carbon left over. Also, if you are at all concerned about global warming or safety in general, these reactions are typically exothermic, which would release untold amounts of heat into the lower atmosphere. Other methods of CO2 reduction and oxygen production would include capturing and sequestering the CO2, a nasty prospect. Not only is this a risky procedure as the CO2 could come pouring out into some poor sap's house and asphyxiate his family, but it is also obscenely expensive. As far as other methods to produce oxygen, you could use electrolysis of water. However, this is an extremely inefficient process in most cases. Furthermore, all of these methods involve appreciable amounts of energy. This energy would be generated overwhelmingly by fossil fuel and nuclear plants. Both of these fuels are finite.
Also on the side of plants are our ecosystems. As humans, we depend on a variety of sources for our energy. At the bottom of most food chains are plants. Thus, without plants, we all starve. So you, Mr. Grube, with your GENIUS PLAN to save us from this table, have damned the human race, nay, all life on this planet. Such idiocy I have never seen, not even from a [group I am not allowed to discriminate against]. Next time, think before you speak.
And to all of you who claim this war against these scum is senseless and disruptive, consider the following:
Today, every inhabitant of this blog must contemplate the day when this blog may no longer be habitable. Every man, woman and child comments under an idiotic sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident, or miscalculation, or by madness. The [group I am not longer allowed to discriminate against] must be abolished before they abolish us.
Still pretty cool, I for one would like it not to have a glass top (why do people think glass is a good table top?), and it would be great if the top was a bit wider. Its knees come out pretty far past the edge of the usable surface.
@weatherman: "But it would be a lot better if the legs bent inwards instead of out."
Good observation, and really no reason I can see that it could not have been designed that way. At the very least, the glass top should have been WAY bigger to stay in proportion to those mammoth legs.
09/13/09
09/13/09
I MADE one of these in the late 80's for a furniture design class. It looked very similar except i used fiberglass fabric and resin. Mine was sort of translucent instead of clear. Funny thing was I only got a C. They said it was derivative and too obvious.
09/13/09
09/13/09
09/13/09
A personal thing though.
09/13/09
09/13/09
The tricky part will be figuring out whether or not to put a clear plastic sheet on your clear plastic table.
09/13/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
Firstly, your charge that egg cartons are not indestructible. Your first claim under that topic is that egg cartons are susceptible to acids. Please recall that most materials are. For example, if I have a metal table and spill an acid on it, the acid will damage the table, as will a base. Your second claim involved fire. Combustion is quite damaging to many materials. If I have a glass table, the heat will destroy the table. If I have a wooden table, it will burn alongside the rest of the room. Thus, the claim that you expect egg cartons to be impervious to damage is quite unrealistic, as well as an idiotic notion that ANY table will hold up to all threats.
Your second claim is that we have no need for plants. Not so, sir. Not so. Firstly, regarding oxygen generation. These work in a few ways. Firstly, you can strip the oxygen from the CO2. However, this leaves you with byproducts. If you are using a chemical converter, you have a mess of carbon left over. Also, if you are at all concerned about global warming or safety in general, these reactions are typically exothermic, which would release untold amounts of heat into the lower atmosphere. Other methods of CO2 reduction and oxygen production would include capturing and sequestering the CO2, a nasty prospect. Not only is this a risky procedure as the CO2 could come pouring out into some poor sap's house and asphyxiate his family, but it is also obscenely expensive. As far as other methods to produce oxygen, you could use electrolysis of water. However, this is an extremely inefficient process in most cases. Furthermore, all of these methods involve appreciable amounts of energy. This energy would be generated overwhelmingly by fossil fuel and nuclear plants. Both of these fuels are finite.
Also on the side of plants are our ecosystems. As humans, we depend on a variety of sources for our energy. At the bottom of most food chains are plants. Thus, without plants, we all starve. So you, Mr. Grube, with your GENIUS PLAN to save us from this table, have damned the human race, nay, all life on this planet. Such idiocy I have never seen, not even from a [group I am not allowed to discriminate against]. Next time, think before you speak.
And to all of you who claim this war against these scum is senseless and disruptive, consider the following:
Today, every inhabitant of this blog must contemplate the day when this blog may no longer be habitable. Every man, woman and child comments under an idiotic sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident, or miscalculation, or by madness. The [group I am not longer allowed to discriminate against] must be abolished before they abolish us.
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/31/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
and those tables look like the cost five dollars to make. with the help of socialized medicine. damn canadians.
03/04/09
(15 seconds of fame)
03/04/09
02/13/09
Still pretty cool, I for one would like it not to have a glass top (why do people think glass is a good table top?), and it would be great if the top was a bit wider. Its knees come out pretty far past the edge of the usable surface.
02/13/09
02/13/09
02/13/09
Good observation, and really no reason I can see that it could not have been designed that way. At the very least, the glass top should have been WAY bigger to stay in proportion to those mammoth legs.