Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
09/04/09
Apple would do well to try and copy Microsoft on this. It's one of the few things I will agree that they do better. We should stop pretending that every aspect of OS X is superior to everything on the market. Most Windows users will admit to the flaws in the product. Maybe they would give OSX a chance if we we didn't pretend that every aspect of it was gold.
Hopefully the next version of OS X will actually provide users with something better than the Dock. Still waiting for a dramatically different OS upgrade from Apple. I wonder how many iterations of X we will have to go through before that happens.
09/03/09
Considering that it looks like the Windows 95 taskbar, I'm pretty sure nobody would want it.
09/03/09
Just sucks it costs.
09/03/09
09/03/09
Except the Dock only really works well for keeping on regularly used programs.
And I do currently use Objectdock. But Start menu kicks Application folder's arse for storing alot of programs. Which you will inevitable acquire.
09/03/09
09/03/09
Oh, that's....that's your desktop. Oh, I see.
*ahem*
Fifteeeeen dollaaars?! Why that's outRAGEOUS!!
09/03/09
You really believe "stacks" are efficient? I hate that feature of the OS. They try so hard to be different than Windows that they have to come up with off the wall stuff to be different.
You can't even give one reason why the Start Menu "sucks".
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
While I neither admit nor deny anything with regard to BDSM, my thoughts are that people who are do not necessarily prefer a Windows Taskbar because of their sexual appetites. Similarly, I don't think that the Windows Taskbar will lead people into a life of leather, hot wax, and cock-and-ball torture.
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
On the plus side at least they didn't call it 'iBar'.
08/05/09
THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!
02/01/09
01/30/09
Step 1: DON'T DOWNLOAD WINDOWS 7.
If the features of an upgrade don't seem appealing, the don't upgrade your software. I know people who still use Office 2003 because they hate the ribbon.
01/30/09
01/30/09
Thanks!
01/25/09
My laptop's Intel 965 chip had prelease Win7 beta drivers which installed automagically, and improved performance by a huge amount. There aren't a lot of prelease Win7 beta drivers, but it jus tmight make your beta experience a whole lot smoother.
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
It's a huge step over Vista, As long as they get the Beta kinks worked out. I've been overly impressed.
Check the forums (google) and see if anyone else has installed the Win7beta on a system similar to yours. Maybe you can find the conflict.
01/23/09