• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#telephones

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 8:22 PM
Sat Nov 14
29 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #telephones more →

    FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends

    Wacky Telephone Car Guy Causes Tussle in My Backyard

    The Fossil Record Now Includes Outdated Personal Electronics

    The Soda Cup Phone: Because Hamburgers are SO 2007

    A Skyscraper So Tall Builders Can't Use Walkie-Talkies

    Telephone Tone Musical Puts Some Real Life Musicians to Shame

    Cellphones Conquer Land Lines for First Time in 2007

    Ripcord Canopy: iPhone for Grownups, or Just Dreamers?

    DUALjack Wirelessly Extends Telephone Lines

    VIVOphone VoiceKey: Skype Gets Even Easier

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of infmom infmom
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    I'm betting those ass-wipe carpet cleaners will still be calling us after this goes into place.
     Reply
    infmom was starred infmom was unstarred
    Image of Kuciwalker Kuciwalker
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    I don't know about Mr. Leibowitz, but I have a REALLY EASY ANSWER for your question, Mr. Diaz: THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

    OK, we can all go home now.
     Reply
    TheGuinnessTooth promoted this comment Kuciwalker was starred Kuciwalker was unstarred
    Image of TheGuinnessTooth TheGuinnessTooth
    08/28/09

    @Kuciwalker: Does the first amendment apply to robots?
     Reply
    TheGuinnessTooth was starred TheGuinnessTooth was unstarred
    Image of RichasB RichasB
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    I love how politicians have some how become Kings and Lords again!!! They can pass laws that make sure they're exempt from. They fly around in planes paid for by the public, etc.
    I'd love to blame democrats/republicans, but in all honesty, I hate you all.
     Reply
    whiteknight89 still plays DiabloII promoted this comment RichasB was starred RichasB was unstarred
    Image of OCEntertainment OCEntertainment
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    Ah, good. Well that takes care of those annoying.....ummm.....

    .......No, there's someone this affects, I'm sure of it....
     Reply
    OCEntertainment was starred OCEntertainment was unstarred
    Image of DustyButt™ DustyButt™
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    What?!

    I can understand why politicians should be allowed to call. So the lesser known contestants can have a chance to get funds together and all... I'm cool with that.

    I can understand why charities and churches (who most times provide charitable services) are allowed to call... I'm OK with that even.

    I can even see why telephone companies can call too. I'm not thrilled over this, but hey, they pretty much own the phone lines. Ownership has it's privileges.

    BUT WHY IN THE FUCK DO BANKS GET TO CALL TOO??? What could possibly be the reasoning behind allowing banks to robocall, besides the fact that your palm just got greased!?

    It sticks out like a sore thumb to me. It's so OBVIOUS that they just paid their way into the legislation. How can they deliver something like this and not expect to look.... urrrrghhhh! It just blows my mind.

    Maybe I'm missing something... Am I wrong in feeling this way?
     Reply
    Jesus Diaz promoted this comment DustyButt™ was starred DustyButt™ was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    In all seriousness, politician endorsement calls are relatively rare, as are church/police charities, and whoever their affiliates are probably would never call that often either. So long as I don't get Nigerian Prince asking for money for his International Kittens and Highway Adoption Fund, it's A-OK.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of ViewtifulJason ViewtifulJason
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    Because they pay them the big bucks. Everyone is corruptible.
     Reply
    MrBangBam promoted this comment ViewtifulJason was starred ViewtifulJason was unstarred
    Image of MrBangBam MrBangBam
    08/28/09

    @ViewtifulJason: I dont understand your logic. If it was about money, corporations and businesses would have the most power, not churches, charities and campaigning politicians.
     Reply
    MrBangBam was starred MrBangBam was unstarred
    Image of TheCrudMan TheCrudMan
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    Suck it telerobot monkeys!
     Reply
    Jesus Diaz promoted this comment TheCrudMan was starred TheCrudMan was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    I rather liked when Mayor Bloomberg's campaign used live callers to endorse him. It was fun to try and chitchat with the caller. If you lacked shame, you could always bring the cordless phone to the bathroom to finish the conversation. Robocallers are boring.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Software_Goddess Software_Goddess
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    They have been banned in Washington State for many years now. It’s about time the rest of the country caught up with the disgruntled citizens of Washington.
     Reply
    Jesus Diaz promoted this comment Software_Goddess was starred Software_Goddess was unstarred
    Image of tok3ninja tok3ninja
    08/28/09

    In reply to FTC Bans Marketing Robocalls Except for Politicians and Their Dear Friends
    Illegal or not it's not going to stop them. We all know how successful the Do Not Call list is.
     Reply
    Geisrud promoted this comment tok3ninja was starred tok3ninja was unstarred
    Image of Geisrud Geisrud
    08/28/09

    @tok3ninja: I've done pretty well with the do not call list. I'm sick of the charities that keep calling.

    A note to all charities, if I wanted to give you money, I would have already.
     Reply
    Geisrud was starred Geisrud was unstarred
    Image of smirkette smirkette
    08/28/09

    @Geisrud: Yes, that and, once I've given you money, I will do so when I am able. Calling me to even more will only get you off my donation list.
     Reply
    Geisrud promoted this comment smirkette was starred smirkette was unstarred
    Image of Slovenly Muse Slovenly Muse
    04/26/09

    In reply to Wacky Telephone Car Guy Causes Tussle in My Backyard
    Those shoes! And those tights! Gah!


    I wonder how often he gets people running up to him, all "Hey, Mister! You have a phone I could borrow?"

     Reply
    Slovenly Muse was starred Slovenly Muse was unstarred
    Image of ceilingFANBOY ceilingFANBOY
    04/26/09

    In reply to Wacky Telephone Car Guy Causes Tussle in My Backyard
    There those Boston people go again, trying to pretend they are important.
     Reply
    ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred
    Image of Nick1693 Nick1693
    04/26/09

    @ceilingFANBOY: Love you too!


    (Lives near Boston.)

     Reply
    Nick1693 was starred Nick1693 was unstarred
    Image of ceilingFANBOY ceilingFANBOY
    04/26/09

    @Nick1693: Don't take it personally, I'm from Baltimore. I just don't like hearing a team that buys its way into the playoffs complain about how another team buys its way into the playoffs.
     Reply
    ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred
    Image of weatherman weatherman
    04/26/09

    In reply to Wacky Telephone Car Guy Causes Tussle in My Backyard
    The family may be in the right, at least legally speaking. That car is the very definition of an attractive nuisance. Howard Davis, on the other hand, can only be described as a homely nuisance at best.
     Reply
    weatherman was starred weatherman was unstarred
    Image of ceilingFANBOY ceilingFANBOY
    04/26/09

    @weatherman: That doesn't fit this case. We are talking about a family, not just kids walking around on private property. Beyond that, it does not state that it is ok for the kids to climb around on the property, but that if the kids are injured climbing around that the owner of the property is liable for the injuries incurred. Again, though, because the parents were supervising the children, the attractive nuisance does not apply.
     Reply
    ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred
    Image of weatherman weatherman
    04/26/09

    @ceilingFANBOY: Thanks professor. :/


    Actually, if you were a law professor, you'd probably know that the doctrine of attractive nuisance has been applied far beyond the simple explanation on the wikipedia page.

     Reply
    weatherman was starred weatherman was unstarred
    Image of .357 .357
    04/26/09

    In reply to Wacky Telephone Car Guy Causes Tussle in My Backyard
    The lesson here: Don't sit your fatass on everything just because you are a tourist.
     Reply
    .357 was starred .357 was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.