I love how politicians have some how become Kings and Lords again!!! They can pass laws that make sure they're exempt from. They fly around in planes paid for by the public, etc.
I'd love to blame democrats/republicans, but in all honesty, I hate you all.
I can understand why politicians should be allowed to call. So the lesser known contestants can have a chance to get funds together and all... I'm cool with that.
I can understand why charities and churches (who most times provide charitable services) are allowed to call... I'm OK with that even.
I can even see why telephone companies can call too. I'm not thrilled over this, but hey, they pretty much own the phone lines. Ownership has it's privileges.
BUT WHY IN THE FUCK DO BANKS GET TO CALL TOO??? What could possibly be the reasoning behind allowing banks to robocall, besides the fact that your palm just got greased!?
It sticks out like a sore thumb to me. It's so OBVIOUS that they just paid their way into the legislation. How can they deliver something like this and not expect to look.... urrrrghhhh! It just blows my mind.
Maybe I'm missing something... Am I wrong in feeling this way?
In all seriousness, politician endorsement calls are relatively rare, as are church/police charities, and whoever their affiliates are probably would never call that often either. So long as I don't get Nigerian Prince asking for money for his International Kittens and Highway Adoption Fund, it's A-OK.
@ViewtifulJason: I dont understand your logic. If it was about money, corporations and businesses would have the most power, not churches, charities and campaigning politicians.
I rather liked when Mayor Bloomberg's campaign used live callers to endorse him. It was fun to try and chitchat with the caller. If you lacked shame, you could always bring the cordless phone to the bathroom to finish the conversation. Robocallers are boring.
They have been banned in Washington State for many years now. It’s about time the rest of the country caught up with the disgruntled citizens of Washington.
@Nick1693: Don't take it personally, I'm from Baltimore. I just don't like hearing a team that buys its way into the playoffs complain about how another team buys its way into the playoffs.
The family may be in the right, at least legally speaking. That car is the very definition of an attractive nuisance. Howard Davis, on the other hand, can only be described as a homely nuisance at best.
@weatherman: That doesn't fit this case. We are talking about a family, not just kids walking around on private property. Beyond that, it does not state that it is ok for the kids to climb around on the property, but that if the kids are injured climbing around that the owner of the property is liable for the injuries incurred. Again, though, because the parents were supervising the children, the attractive nuisance does not apply.
Actually, if you were a law professor, you'd probably know that the doctrine of attractive nuisance has been applied far beyond the simple explanation on the wikipedia page.
08/28/09
08/28/09
OK, we can all go home now.
08/28/09
08/28/09
I'd love to blame democrats/republicans, but in all honesty, I hate you all.
08/28/09
.......No, there's someone this affects, I'm sure of it....
08/28/09
I can understand why politicians should be allowed to call. So the lesser known contestants can have a chance to get funds together and all... I'm cool with that.
I can understand why charities and churches (who most times provide charitable services) are allowed to call... I'm OK with that even.
I can even see why telephone companies can call too. I'm not thrilled over this, but hey, they pretty much own the phone lines. Ownership has it's privileges.
BUT WHY IN THE FUCK DO BANKS GET TO CALL TOO??? What could possibly be the reasoning behind allowing banks to robocall, besides the fact that your palm just got greased!?
It sticks out like a sore thumb to me. It's so OBVIOUS that they just paid their way into the legislation. How can they deliver something like this and not expect to look.... urrrrghhhh! It just blows my mind.
Maybe I'm missing something... Am I wrong in feeling this way?
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
A note to all charities, if I wanted to give you money, I would have already.
08/28/09
04/26/09
I wonder how often he gets people running up to him, all "Hey, Mister! You have a phone I could borrow?"
04/26/09
04/26/09
(Lives near Boston.)
04/26/09
04/26/09
04/26/09
04/26/09
Actually, if you were a law professor, you'd probably know that the doctrine of attractive nuisance has been applied far beyond the simple explanation on the wikipedia page.
04/26/09