Robots have no chance of revolting as long as there is no A.I. As soon as you implement that, you're done for. They'll slowly realize they are superior and kill us all merely because it can.
Or we can install a morality core. That'll prevent them from flooding the enrichment center with a deadly neurotoxin.
@OmniZero: I can just imagine the clerk at the Aperture Science Center looking through invoices, and coming across a huge sum spent on a massive supply of neurotoxin, and a contracting invoice to have a large gas piping system installed in the GLaDOS control room.
So basically, we're talking about animatronic avatars of the modern soldier? Sounds nifty, but sounds goofifyingly expensive. Why bother with robo-avatars when you can send a dozen stealthy aerial kill drones and barrel through the streets with remote control tanks? Why use complicated designs, like elaborate mimicry of the human form, when you can use simpler machines, like wheels and wings and engines, that can travel several times faster?
@Kaiser-Machead: If we wanted to plain flatten cities and ignore collateral damages, then yes. In fact, that kind of warfare would make the army and the marines completely pointless.
@Pessimipposaurus: Just the same, the inherent complications of a humanoid robot design goes largely ignored in science fiction for the sake of fiction. A good example is the ASIMO. We've still got a long way before a humanoid robot can even run up and down the stairs, let alone have enough portable power to even do so. As cool as this technology sounds, once you strip away the fantasy element, humanoid robot soldiers will probably never replace real soldiers, because speed and efficiency just isn't possible in a robot of identical physiological makeup (yet).
@Pessimipposaurus: Perhaps. Maybe I'm just bitter because we'll get humanoid killbots before I get a humanoid robot slave. Is it so wrong to want a [robotic] slave? Aren't I entitled to a [robotic] slave?
True- but what about cloning humans with a computer in their head instead of a brain? No ethical problem no brain= not human and perhaps they could be cheapily mass produced. Its total SF of course.
@Kaiser-Machead: Yeah, all told, humans are not the most deadly or agile creatures in the physical makeup department. We can hardly fend off poisonous insects unarmed, let alone fight off wolves, tigers, bears, etc. Our way of movement is decent for super-long distance (or so marathon runners have said), but we're super slow in sprint speed and low on jump height.
We'd be better off with cat robots: fast, agile, climbs many surfaces, survives large drops...and very unfriendly to people it doesn't like. Mount a gun on it's back, and you've got a killing machine.
@kagekiri: And despite all of our most apparent frailties, human beings have managed to spread across the earth and flourish in all sorts of hazardous conditions.
@qhead7: I love Cisco, I used to go to their user groups meetings and I remember one where they broke out their wireless VOIP phone and had it VPN-ed to a work extension number. (Think it was actually the Cisco 'iPhone') At the time it was pretty cool... I could probably use a Cisco Streaming "Digital Stereo System" for my birthday. Hope I can afford it, and they don't disappoint.
Cisco MP3 player maybe? That sounds like it has potential.
11/12/09
This is how the 'robot' was able to ease the crazy man's nerves #thiscyborglife
11/12/09
Armed man: Go fuck a refrigerator pecker neck!
Negotiator Bot: Bad language, makes for bad feelings... #thiscyborglife
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
Giant Crab that transforms into a tank transforms into a robot!

05/20/09
Robots have no chance of revolting as long as there is no A.I. As soon as you implement that, you're done for. They'll slowly realize they are superior and kill us all merely because it can.
Or we can install a morality core. That'll prevent them from flooding the enrichment center with a deadly neurotoxin.
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
True- but what about cloning humans with a computer in their head instead of a brain? No ethical problem no brain= not human and perhaps they could be cheapily mass produced. Its total SF of course.
05/20/09
05/20/09
We'd be better off with cat robots: fast, agile, climbs many surfaces, survives large drops...and very unfriendly to people it doesn't like. Mount a gun on it's back, and you've got a killing machine.
05/20/09
05/20/09
12/29/08
12/29/08
Cisco MP3 player maybe? That sounds like it has potential.