Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@bosskev: I would say it was more like tunnel vision as it relates to the "war on terror." But that's better than the tunnel vision of our current president as he stares deep into our pockets.
@bosskev: Ha, good one!
@mikeness: So you're saying that it was better with the old president not caring about money, basically throwing it out of the window, than with Obama cutting down on expenses in any possible way? Wow…
@jbaranski: "...politics? Leave it alone and talk about photography please."
Alrighty.
Here we see an amazing photograph taking advantage of dramatic lighting, capturing the subject in a dynamic, thoughtful pose. The distant spotlights, coupled with the framing of the figure from a low-angle vantage point, suggest a powerful stage presence, while the black background keeps the location timeless and universal. In sum, here's a photo that, through its art, presents a commanding persona that has captured the respect of the public.
And, as such, this photo also serves to remind us how, like statistics, photos do not necessarily have anything to do with the truth.
And some of these folks--like a certain RB just above you--I have no idea WTF they are talking about. I mean, I can see it's meant to be some kind of slam against me (I think), but past that it could just be output from that one lucky monkey on a typewriter.
Does it seems calloused to ask why a blind man would want to take pictures? To look at later? Share his visual reflections? Seriously, I must be missing something here. Or else this is a medicine show testimonial...
Summermodoin'_GitEmSteveDave promoted this comment
godwhacker, your incandescent leader! was starred
godwhacker, your incandescent leader! was unstarred
I was going to say (rather snidely) that the reason you buy an expensive tilt-shift lens is for architectural photography, i.e., to keep parallel lines from converging (so the building looks "right"), not for a dumb Lilliputian gimmick as proposed by this article.
Then I went to the Dvice link and looked at the dozens of sample shots. Uh...stunning.
@jetRink: It is not just blurring the top/bottom (which is why after-the-fact Photoshop blurring looks fake), nor is it reducing the depth of field (which cannot be done after-the-fact). It is actually shifting the focal plane to a different angle/direction.
Normally the focal plane is exactly parallel to the camera's film/sensor plane. These lenses purposely alter that relationship, tilting the focal plane out of parallel. So it is not reducing the depth of field--that is a constant--but it is changing where the depth of field lies in space, placing it in a different plane. So instead of having depth of field from "front to back", you might now have depth of field from "top to bottom" or some other variation. HTH.
Slap this bad boy on your video camera and get some crazy shots...anyone shot any video with this yet? I'd love to see what happens when you pull focus, dolly-zoom, etc.
@TheCrudMan: "...can't dolly zoom with a prime lens."
No, but the filmmaker in me says you still get points for knowing the phrase "pull focus". Not quite ready to hire you as my next DP, but do keep your resume handy...
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
Of course, that could just be 'cuz I always keep a banana in there. Never know when you'll need a quick potassium pick-me-up.
07/18/09
07/18/09
@mikeness: So you're saying that it was better with the old president not caring about money, basically throwing it out of the window, than with Obama cutting down on expenses in any possible way? Wow…
07/18/09
LOL
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
@jbaranski: "...politics? Leave it alone and talk about photography please."
Alrighty.
Here we see an amazing photograph taking advantage of dramatic lighting, capturing the subject in a dynamic, thoughtful pose. The distant spotlights, coupled with the framing of the figure from a low-angle vantage point, suggest a powerful stage presence, while the black background keeps the location timeless and universal. In sum, here's a photo that, through its art, presents a commanding persona that has captured the respect of the public.
And, as such, this photo also serves to remind us how, like statistics, photos do not necessarily have anything to do with the truth.
07/18/09
07/18/09
Its been awhile since you stirred up some folks bosskev, it has been to long.
haha
07/18/09
;^)
And some of these folks--like a certain RB just above you--I have no idea WTF they are talking about. I mean, I can see it's meant to be some kind of slam against me (I think), but past that it could just be output from that one lucky monkey on a typewriter.
07/18/09
@bosskev: well, I have been on giz a lot less lately and do miss the Bosskev, so please kind Sir, continue.
+1
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
Um...how are your skills at pantomime?
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
I would hope he admits it. Any photographer would say that the iPhone's camera is pitiful.
Nice story, though.
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/29/09
03/10/09
Oh no wait..
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
Then I went to the Dvice link and looked at the dozens of sample shots. Uh...stunning.
I think I'll just shut up.
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
Normally the focal plane is exactly parallel to the camera's film/sensor plane. These lenses purposely alter that relationship, tilting the focal plane out of parallel. So it is not reducing the depth of field--that is a constant--but it is changing where the depth of field lies in space, placing it in a different plane. So instead of having depth of field from "front to back", you might now have depth of field from "top to bottom" or some other variation. HTH.
03/10/09
03/10/09
Mistyped, of course you can't dolly zoom with a prime lens.
03/10/09
No, but the filmmaker in me says you still get points for knowing the phrase "pull focus". Not quite ready to hire you as my next DP, but do keep your resume handy...
03/10/09
I usually prefer "rack focus" :P
03/10/09
www.instantrimshot.com
03/10/09
[www.instantrimshot.com]