Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I remember waking up one morning and my computer screen looking like that first pic. I took out my video card and a few of the resistors had cracked open. It will be a while before 1080p will be a standard on netbooks, if netbooks do last that long...
@IN THE FACE!: Actually the contrary - The complaints have been particularly centered around the largest metro areas with the densest population of high-rises that block AT&T's 3G signals. Like NYC, particularly Manhattan. There's physics behind it, not marketing.
I live outside Buffalo, NY. Suburban area. Second most depressed economy only to Detroit nationwide, and with a declining population as you'd expect. No carrier would have any business case for expansion here.
And we have literally 1 skyscraper, in the city metro.
AT&T coverage is flawless here. So is Verizon. I think you'd be challenged to find a dead area.
The challenges ARE the metro areas, mostly for the poor penetration (and resulting dead 'shadows') of signal through mazes of tall, large buildings.
Hence why they picked those locations for testing.
I spend most of my time in L.A. and the surrounding areas and I've never had any problems with AT&T. I regularly get about 1.5 to 1.6Mbps download and 500Kbps upload speeds around here.
Sorry for posting this again, but in case anyone missed it, the NY Time article about "AT&T Takes the Blame, Even for the iPhone’s Faults" can be found here:
Given this test by Giz, it seems to indicate that it is possible (though I still believe unlikely) that some of the wireless network issues may actually be a product of the iPhone and not necessarily the network. Of course, given the success on other network in other countries, it is hard to believe.
So does this mean that the iPhone itself is borked? I know it is the Jesus Phone (in every sense of the word) and all, and I really do like mine, but is there some hardware or software item that is just busted?
@Canoehead: The NY Times ran a piece thinking that the iPhone may very well be the cause of the problems and that AT&T, for political reasons, could not say so:
@Monty: I know Apple (PBUI) can do no wrong, but it really would not be a shock if a new entrant to the Cel Phone arena has some problems. The real problem would be if we are not allowed to talk about it, such that it never gets fixed.
That's pretty impressive AT&T... now if you could only get me some cell service in my house in SF. Or the Mission. Or downtown. Or the Haight. Or Twin Peaks. Or SoMa. Then we'll be square!
@Ryan_Long: Seriously! What's up with the ENTIRE Mission district being a dead zone?!? I think my phone drops calls if it even senses that I might be going anywhere near 16th and Valencia.
@redbearded: I don't know. My brother is a cop in the Mission and I tell him to contact AT&T over his lack of shitty service. I mean seriously- paying $100 a month to not get to use a phone.
I know this sounds terrible, but what if you were being mugged, or raped and you reach for your phone only to get a "call failure" or "no service"
I think it's unacceptable and I can only hope someone at AT&T get's the message at some point.
Question: I may have simply missed this, but were all these tests conducted roughly at the same time?
My individual user experience has varied widely depending on time. Around rush hour, forget it; I might as well bring some semaphore flags. Weekends, usually no problem even with big downloads.
If these tests weren't all performed roughly at the same time, might user demand affect the outcome?
07:29 PM
07:10 PM
Oh well--time to check on the cattle and oil well in my backyard.
06:08 PM
*Provided you live in one of the 12 largest metros in the us (and never leave them, unless you are flying directly to another one)...
**Otherwise you're iPwnt.
06:31 PM
I live outside Buffalo, NY. Suburban area. Second most depressed economy only to Detroit nationwide, and with a declining population as you'd expect. No carrier would have any business case for expansion here.
And we have literally 1 skyscraper, in the city metro.
AT&T coverage is flawless here. So is Verizon. I think you'd be challenged to find a dead area.
The challenges ARE the metro areas, mostly for the poor penetration (and resulting dead 'shadows') of signal through mazes of tall, large buildings.
Hence why they picked those locations for testing.
07:35 PM
06:00 PM
05:50 PM
Fucking opportunists...
05:46 PM
[www.nytimes.com]
Given this test by Giz, it seems to indicate that it is possible (though I still believe unlikely) that some of the wireless network issues may actually be a product of the iPhone and not necessarily the network. Of course, given the success on other network in other countries, it is hard to believe.
05:41 PM
05:25 PM
This certainly backs up AT&T speed claims, but there's a hidden indicator here on how built out the networks are.
05:07 PM
Serious question: Is it fair to draw conclusion about dropped calls based on data-only tests?
05:07 PM
05:44 PM
[www.nytimes.com]
06:09 PM
05:06 PM
05:08 PM
#3gtest2009
06:15 PM
I know this sounds terrible, but what if you were being mugged, or raped and you reach for your phone only to get a "call failure" or "no service"
I think it's unacceptable and I can only hope someone at AT&T get's the message at some point.
04:47 PM
Thanks guys. Keep it up.
04:47 PM
A+ Gizmodo with a shinny star sticker!
05:07 PM
05:20 PM
04:44 PM
My individual user experience has varied widely depending on time. Around rush hour, forget it; I might as well bring some semaphore flags. Weekends, usually no problem even with big downloads.
If these tests weren't all performed roughly at the same time, might user demand affect the outcome?
04:42 PM