I was in high school when the first iPod came out, and one of the first adopters before I graduated. By senior year everyone had either a 4G or a mini. I've owned 6 iPods, turned my friends onto iPods and Macs, and I own a first-gen iPhone. So, let me be very clear.
I have never, in my life, heard anyone in person, on the internet, or in any other form of media, refer to the iPod as a "'Pod". Not one single time. Women who came to buy them from me at Meijer, didn't even know the difference between an iPod and an mp3 player (i.e. that there is none), at least knew that an iPod was an iPod, and not a 'Pod.
Moreover, there is a company in my region that sells a service of portable storage, called PODS. I never saw Apple throw a shit fit over that, and the word is right there: pod! At least in this context, it is in the word podium, which is a self-contained word. The origin of the word podium lies in the word pod, but only as a word for 'foot' so I think it's safe to say that you have to reach pretty damn far to make this connection.
This does infringe on Apple's industrial design rights, since the Podium is meant to mimic the iMac's appearance.
I'm thinking that the whole naming issue Apple is trying to bring up is a smoke screen, and indeed, I'd be willing to bet that if this reaches the courts, Apple will focus much more on the design than on the name.
Seems you've etched away at whatever collective soul you've had left, and now allow your legal team to prance around to dole out warning letters willy-nilly like they're the goddamn litigation fairy.
Next you'll have your Cupertino death squads roving around sniping anyone who dares to take a bite out of an apple with a fucking leaf still attached to the stem. Will you then sue LEGO because their Duplo systems have a similar feel as a shiny white Macbook?
Now, I agree that it's a dick move by Apple, but they have a decent case.
When I talk about MP3 players, I don't call my zen a pod, I would call my iPod a pod if anything. Now I agree it's a stretch, but the name "PODium" is obviously playing off of the ipod's sucess.
Secondly, the case stand identically matches the iMac stand as well.
They wanted it to look like an Apple product because they are marketing to apple/ipod consumers. But, while doing this they punned a name and copyed the stand which is infringement.
@Poison_Shroom: Except for the fact that a podium is a platform that is used to raise something to a short distance above its surroundings. it is like a dias, although it is also used interchangeably with "lectern". It derives from the Latin for foot.
@Poison_Shroom: You actually call your iPod a pod? You must be the only one.
I may not have a very good understanding of trademark laws, but I'm sure "McDonalds" would have a difficult time killing competition that used the name "Donal" - any lawyers out there know if there is precedence for enforcement of partial names beyond the "i"?
The eMachine was a computer, though. But unless this stand somehow transforms an iPhone into an iMac-competitor, it's just a way to have a nifty stand that looks like your iMac. Sit them side by side on your desk or whatever. It's not going to eat into any of Apple's sales. Heck, it might actually boost them a little.
Although I agree the claim is ridiculous they should just transpose the P and the D making Dopium. I just think it sounds cool, like if dope and opium mated and had a drug baby.
03/31/09
03/18/09
I have never, in my life, heard anyone in person, on the internet, or in any other form of media, refer to the iPod as a "'Pod". Not one single time. Women who came to buy them from me at Meijer, didn't even know the difference between an iPod and an mp3 player (i.e. that there is none), at least knew that an iPod was an iPod, and not a 'Pod.
Moreover, there is a company in my region that sells a service of portable storage, called PODS. I never saw Apple throw a shit fit over that, and the word is right there: pod! At least in this context, it is in the word podium, which is a self-contained word. The origin of the word podium lies in the word pod, but only as a word for 'foot' so I think it's safe to say that you have to reach pretty damn far to make this connection.
03/18/09
03/18/09
I'm thinking that the whole naming issue Apple is trying to bring up is a smoke screen, and indeed, I'd be willing to bet that if this reaches the courts, Apple will focus much more on the design than on the name.
03/18/09
03/18/09
You just keep "buying in".
Suckers.
03/18/09
Next you'll have your Cupertino death squads roving around sniping anyone who dares to take a bite out of an apple with a fucking leaf still attached to the stem. Will you then sue LEGO because their Duplo systems have a similar feel as a shiny white Macbook?
Gah! You used to be cool!
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
Myself, I prefer to hang my coats on them, but that's just me.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
Now, I agree that it's a dick move by Apple, but they have a decent case.
When I talk about MP3 players, I don't call my zen a pod, I would call my iPod a pod if anything. Now I agree it's a stretch, but the name "PODium" is obviously playing off of the ipod's sucess.
Secondly, the case stand identically matches the iMac stand as well.
They wanted it to look like an Apple product because they are marketing to apple/ipod consumers. But, while doing this they punned a name and copyed the stand which is infringement.
03/18/09
03/18/09
I may not have a very good understanding of trademark laws, but I'm sure "McDonalds" would have a difficult time killing competition that used the name "Donal" - any lawyers out there know if there is precedence for enforcement of partial names beyond the "i"?
03/18/09
The item has no competing duplicate from Apple. This thing isn't going to usurp the role of anything Apple has, like, ever.
03/18/09
The trade dress claim: that's a lot stronger. Go to the company's website and you'll see that, yes, it appears to be taking the look of the iMac.
[www.podiumrevolution.com]
Apple beat eMachines several years ago on a "trade dress" claim involving the iMac.
03/18/09
The eMachine was a computer, though. But unless this stand somehow transforms an iPhone into an iMac-competitor, it's just a way to have a nifty stand that looks like your iMac. Sit them side by side on your desk or whatever. It's not going to eat into any of Apple's sales. Heck, it might actually boost them a little.
03/18/09
I'm not saying it's a slam-dunk; I'm saying it's a colorable claim.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
Trademark law can sure make a company look like a bunch of jerks.
03/18/09
There, fixed that for ya. ;)
03/18/09
I guess the question I have is: Is it pronounced POD-ium, or Podium? As that would make a bit of a difference.
At least they didn't name it the Gateway Monster Pod. You'd have Gateway, Monster Cable, Monster.com, and Apple suing them.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09