Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@MrBlahBlah: but but there's more iphone users than the pre and all android phones combined (i don't know any numbers, please don't flame me). so if the iphone had this feature, imagine how accurate the traffic data would be. damn u AT&T/Apple
And very few mobile phones have a GPS aerial big enough to work in a car/bus/train/tram so this will be disproportionately skewed to walkers right? That'll be real useful.
@All Your Base Are Belong To Us: Eh? Pretty much all current smartphones have a GPS antenna that'll work as well in a car as any other portable GPS unit does. How do you think TomTom has managed to sell Windows Mobile versions of its software for however long now? And an iPhone version is coming soon.
I'm not worried at all about giving them this kind of info...they can even have what kind of car I drive, and what music I'm listening to if they'd like it. What do people think they'll do with my info? I think I'm probably a boring person in the eyes of Google, and most people would be too....
@jakebathman: yeah, i have no idea what people are worried about when it comes to google and privacy.
I think what goes through their minds is something like:
"oh noez, google 'knows' i have been drivin down this street so my secret identity has been compromised!!! not only that but now hackers can figure out my SSN by the speed at which i drive!!!!!!!"
hmmm, not sure how this would work exactly since in my state insurance covers the driver as well. So I can have non-owners insurance and drive someones car that doesnt and I would be covered.
Wouldn't it be easier to just nip the problem at the bud? Get rid of automobiles and roads entirely. Speeding isn't the only problem eliminating automobiles would solve.
As far as the privacy nuts go, check the Register article: satellite-based == GPS based to determine speed. It doesn't upload your position to a satellite or anywhere outside the vehicle.
It's turning into some bizarre cross between 1984 and Judge Dredd. I'm sure it's only a matter of time before this is mandatory on newer cars sold to British subjects... and soon after older cars will be phased out to make sure everyone's compliant.
@omgwtflolbbqbye: Everyone knows tin/aluminum foil doesn't work. It's what they WANT you to think. For good blocking, take the advice of professional anti-abduction hat makers:
@Justin Culmo: I live on a busy road that is very dangerous due to speeding. We have no police to enforce it, so nothing will slow people. I figure it will get more attention when someone dies and not before. I don't mind this or speed cameras, or GPS issued speeding tickets. Fuck it, slow down.
Guess where they can stick it? I'm a fan of mandatory insurance, but I'd rather it not be required (as here in NH) than be enforced by traffic cameras. This seems like "guilty until proven innocent" to me - why should I have to go to court to fight a computer's fuckup? At least a live cop will hear you out if you're polite (as you always should be).
I'm not advocating that anyone go shoot these out, but it would be pretty cool if they just ended up with holes in 'em.
Isn't it enough to have your insurance information handy when you actually need to present it? Nice idea, but having so much technology do so many things strikes me as being overly complicated, and may present more problems than they solve. All we need are failed scans that end up with false citations for not driving without insurance.
Notice they are not putting in place any new laws. They are just devising a way to enforce the law by observing public places. It was already illegal, and has been for some time. You just might actually get in trouble for it now. Either you agree that people must be ensured or not. If you don't, fight the law, not the enforcement of it. If you do, how can you have a problem with enforcement fo the law?
08/26/09
[lifehacker.com]
they said it'll work on the iphone. wtf AT&T/Apple/google...
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
I think what goes through their minds is something like:
"oh noez, google 'knows' i have been drivin down this street so my secret identity has been compromised!!! not only that but now hackers can figure out my SSN by the speed at which i drive!!!!!!!"
08/01/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
[url][www.theregister.co.uk]]
05/11/09
[www.theregister.co.uk]
05/11/09
05/11/09
And for that reason
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
05/11/09
It's turning into some bizarre cross between 1984 and Judge Dredd. I'm sure it's only a matter of time before this is mandatory on newer cars sold to British subjects... and soon after older cars will be phased out to make sure everyone's compliant.
05/11/09
05/11/09
[www.stopabductions.com]
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
03/18/09
I'm not advocating that anyone go shoot these out, but it would be pretty cool if they just ended up with holes in 'em.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
Sorry, screwed that up.
03/18/09
Notice they are not putting in place any new laws. They are just devising a way to enforce the law by observing public places. It was already illegal, and has been for some time. You just might actually get in trouble for it now. Either you agree that people must be ensured or not. If you don't, fight the law, not the enforcement of it. If you do, how can you have a problem with enforcement fo the law?
03/18/09
I can support the law and contest the punishment - taking money from people isn't conducive to them being able to afford things like insurance.
So which is it, do you want all motorists insured (full compliance) or do you want all motorists scrutinized and fined (full enforcement)?
If everyone got caught for every law they broke, the vast majority of our population would be in jail or in debt to the government for life.
03/18/09
I think thats the long term goal.
03/18/09
sure seems that way.
03/18/09
03/18/09
so ok, lets say you have insurance, you get your plates, and then you cancel the insurance. Do they send someone around to take your plates back??
03/18/09
03/18/09
they do that here 'cept they just won't give you a registration sticker, which will get you pulled over.