Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Wouldn't it be simpler to just pre-position spybot/killbot packages in low earth orbit over trouble spots, and then call them in as needed. Sure there's an upfront cost, but it puts them even closer to the action, with the added benefit of no ICBM launches during the actual crisis at hand? #icbm
@Canoehead: its that there upfront cost that would keep this from leaving the drawing board. I mean, imagine if no conflict arose in the region that the military predicted, all that peace would make the designers look like fools (and waste taxpayer money). but this here ICBM idea can be sent anywhere, and we wouldnt have to worry about wasting resources because we would all be dead when the russians launch their nuclear ICBMs in retaliation to our spybot ICBM. #icbm
@minibeardeath: Get richard brandson to put them in low earth orbit. I think he only charges 50k per seat. You could buy the whole cabin in need be. A single tomahawk missile is over $1M, so i expect ICBMs would be much more.
i have no idea if i'm being sarcastic or not
I think the problem was first brought to light with the 1990s Clinton-uses-a-cruise-missile-to-kill-a-camel-and-a-tent "strikes" against Al Qeada. The US used Tomahawks, which are essentially very small subsonic aircraft, launched from off the Pakistani coast. Of course, they had to warn the Pakistanis that they were on the way(don't want to start an accidental nuke war between India and Pakistan), and the missiles' low cruise speed gave the Pakistanis plenty of time to warn Bin Laden and for Bin Laden to decamp. #icbm
@Large wooden badger: I believe this would only be used if they decided to actually strike. In which case this could come in handy if they need information quickly giving them even more air superiority.
So they would just use drones, spy planes or satellites in any normal situation.
This reminds me of something my grandpa told me once about this military project during WWII we put in place, wherein the U.S. has people stationed in specific places throughout the world enabling us to put "Boot to Earth" anywhere in the world within 2 hours. I forget the name of the project. Maybe someone can help me with the name on that. #icbm
@weshirecat tells it in the form of a question?: Speaking of projects. I have been reading into the Soviet Union's doomsday weapon called "The Dead Hand" that was never really known about until recently. It was essentially designed to strike back in case the US ever decided to strike them.
It's pretty interesting. There is a book out about it too. #icbm
Great idea. Let's launch ICBM's over international borders for spying purposes. Other country's will love that. Can you imagine the crap storm it would cause if Russia or North Korea did the same to the US? #icbm
No problems with the spying itself (since every civilized country does it), it's the spying attached to missiles usually used to carry nukes that strikes me as odd. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of covert operations?
I'm just saying if Russia decided to send a missile our way in the name of spying and national security, Uncle Sam and the public at large would go bat shit crazy. Probably why the plans were "scrapped". #icbm
@Twanzio: Well, considering this seems to be meant for wartime, I'm doubtful we'd be worried about how the other guy felt... so long as they and their neighbors know it's not sportin' a nuclear warhead. #icbm
Just to get this straight, we expect our enemy, during war time, to trust us when we tell them "the ICBM we just launched your way is not loaded with Nukes, just armed spy bots?"
There's like an adult back, it's someone has zero defends my sense an adult back, it's like and no air play, it just offense an adult hitting fundamentally unfair about should I cheer for rockets to him?
There's someone has zero defense or rockets to hitting someone from 2000 feet with a huge cannon when that someone from 20000 feet with a kid, yeah he'll with a kid, yeah he'll with a huge cannon when that should I cheer force or hit back, it
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
@qbrad:
11/18/09
#tips
11/17/09
11/18/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/18/09
i have no idea if i'm being sarcastic or not
11/18/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
But, isn't the idea of spying to you know...not let people know your doing it? Otherwise your just finding crap out.
A spy plane is rather low key, and usually has some type of stealth or other sneaky sneaky.
Launch a ICBM and every country with a space monitoring center is gonna know it.
To me it's the equivalent of sending james bond out in a clown suit and a giant blinking sandwich board that says "GIVE MEH YUR SEEKRITZ"
11/17/09
So they would just use drones, spy planes or satellites in any normal situation.
11/17/09
11/17/09
It's pretty interesting. There is a book out about it too. #icbm
11/17/09
Really though, 20 man points to whichever Giz reader can throw together a quick photoshop of an ICBM dispersing cotton candy over the Kremlin. #icbm
11/17/09
11/17/09
@Shamoononon: I shave my legs.: #icbm
11/17/09
There is something very wrong there.
It kind of looks like Pearl Krabs, the little whale girl thingy on Sponge Bob and a phallic object at the same time.
Somebody will come up with something witty to say, I'm just gonna go ahead and copy that.
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
Spying is the status quo. #icbm
11/17/09
No problems with the spying itself (since every civilized country does it), it's the spying attached to missiles usually used to carry nukes that strikes me as odd. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of covert operations?
I'm just saying if Russia decided to send a missile our way in the name of spying and national security, Uncle Sam and the public at large would go bat shit crazy. Probably why the plans were "scrapped". #icbm
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/18/09
Just to get this straight, we expect our enemy, during war time, to trust us when we tell them "the ICBM we just launched your way is not loaded with Nukes, just armed spy bots?"
Okay... I see no flaws in this logic.
11/18/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
Don't woorrryyy. This one will be designed with Hello Kitty figures. #icbm
11/17/09
Solv'd. #icbm
09/24/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
There's someone has zero defense or rockets to hitting someone from 2000 feet with a huge cannon when that someone from 20000 feet with a kid, yeah he'll with a kid, yeah he'll with a huge cannon when that should I cheer force or hit back, it
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
he shoot kid rockets for air play, my sense adult back. then my adult lump, checking you see my sugar lumps.
09/23/09
I didn't know if it was vertigo or someone hitting me with a kid from 20,000 feet.