<![CDATA[Gizmodo: universal display corporation]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: universal display corporation]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/universaldisplaycorporation http://gizmodo.com/tag/universaldisplaycorporation <![CDATA[Wrist-Worn, Flexible OLED Out in the Wild]]> The Universal Display Corporation (UDC) have themselves a wrist-worn, flexible OLED prototype that they built with support from the US Department of Defense.

As you can see, the 4-inch screen looks a bit too unwieldy for practical use in the field, but the UDC believes that this technology will find a home with our military forces some time in the not to distant future (and in our cellphones and other devices beyond that). In the meantime, they plan to bring a working model to CES, so at least a few lucky attendees will get a taste of our OLED future. [OLED Display]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5124466&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Super Skinny OLED Display Is Thinner Than a Sheet of Paper]]> If you thought OLEDs were thin already, researchers at the Universal Display Corporation (whose factory we visited last year) have made a flexible display that's positively anorexic. The ultra-thin metal foil screen is less than 50 micrometers thin, which means it's even thinner than a sheet of A4 paper. The UDC folks also claimed that their new invention exceeds the industrial target of 1,000 hours and the lifetime of conventionally sealed glass packaged OLEDs.

The researchers said they were able to get better lifetime ratings after identifying a flexible, highly impermeable barrier layer, which helps keep the OLED screen from degrading because of oxygen and water. Flexible, amazingly thin and with a very decent lifespan? It sounds like we're two steps closer to handing out Young Lady's Illustrated Primers. [AVS Symposium via Slashgear]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5066876&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Exclusive Video: Flat Flexible OLED Screen Survives Hammer Pounding]]> What happens when you smash a super-thin OLED display with a hammer? Last week, Wilson and I learned all about OLEDs, but after our factory tour we were left with that one nagging question. Lucky for us, mystery solved, as UDC has the answer courtesy of this video demonstration. Personally, I'd like to see this test performed on more gadgets. Blending is getting a little old. [UDC]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329234&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Exclusive: The Secret Sauce That Goes Into an OLED High Def TV]]> UDC is one of a handful of companies pioneering OLED development and manufacturing techniques for the big boys such as Samsung, Sony, LG and of course, the US Department of Defense. No one's written about how they make these displays, panels that'll make up our next generation of super-slim HDTVs, until now. This week, Benny and I visited Universal Display Corporation's headquarters in Princeton, NJ for an exclusive tour of the factory, where we witnessed just how they make 'em.

We gowned up, donned stylish hairnets and observed OLED panel fabrication up close, a process that involves expensive super-heated dope and something called a shadow mask. (Sounds like fairly nice evening in Vegas, doesn't it?)

OLEDs (organic light-emitting diodes) differ from LCDs in that they don't need a backlight of any kind, because each pixel is made of a phosphorescent particle that lights up on its own when excited. The trick is getting the particles onto the glass, plastic or metallic screen—the substrate, they call it—in an orderly fashion. There are a few techniques, but here's the basic process:

1. The phosphorescent colored particles, or "dope," are prepared. The three colors, red, green and blue, are actually made from powders that are red, yellow and orange. To this day no one is certain why. The powder is carried in vials to the fabrication room.

2. Meanwhile, in a Class 100 clean room (shown in video and gallery under UV protective yellow-tinted glass), the substrate is prepared to be fused with the particles. I think I saw a salad bar in the back, but our guide, Janice Mahon, VP of Technology Commercialization, only laughed knowingly. Intel has Class 10 clean rooms, btw, but Jesus says his mom's house is even cleaner than that.

3. Here's where the magic happens: dope meets substrate in a sticky act of love. In the big business of OLEDs these days there are four ways to make this happen:

Vacuum Thermal Evaporation - This is UDC's tried and true technique, a hot and steamy method involving super-heated dope that evaporates up into a grid, known as the shadow mask, that is placed over the substrate. First the red particles are evaporated, then the grid is shifted ever so slightly, then green is evaporated, then a final shift for blue. In the end, the panel has RGB pixels evenly distributed across the whole thing. Since you have to hang the shadow mask up under the substrate, there's a chance it could sag on larger screens, so VTE is aimed at smaller screens.

Organic Vapor Phase Deposition - This is where the vapor is heated up then streamed into a system of "showerheads" that deposit the particles on a cooled substrate.

Ink-Jet Printing - If the dope can be mixed into liquid form, it can run through technology similar to the stuff inside your printer. Precise depositing of dots on a substrate is easy, but the challenges are turning the dope into a liquid and then depositing the right amount in little wells on the substrate where they can dry.

Organic Vapor Jet Printing - It's what it sounds like, a printing technique that lets you shoot particles through a printhead and straight onto the substrate. The benefit of this is that you don't have to turn the stuff into a liquid first, and you don't have to worry about getting the particles to dry later. But it's still really really hard.Glass is the easiest thing to use to make OLEDs, because it is rigid and because it is not porous: moisture and oxygen can't get in and ruin the little glowing organic molecules. Plastic is the worst, because it is easily penetrated. Metal foil is a middle ground, because the metal side keeps the molecules secure, but the glowing side still needs a special coating, and won't last as long as a glass OLED.

Like phosphors in a plasma TV, OLED materials fade over their lifetime, even when tightly sealed. At this point, red and green last hundreds of thousands of hours, so they could easily last as long as other technologies. But blue is still an issue. In any situation, it's going to be the first to go, though some OLED panels are now being rated in the 50,000-hour range.

Next up for UDC is a working flexible screen on metal, hopefully sooner than later. [UDC]

–Video was shot and edited by the multitalented Benny Goldman; I took the photos.

More sights from Gizmodo's UDC field trip:

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328733&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Flexible OLED Display]]>

Starting out strong at the Fifth Annual Flexible Displays and Microelectronics Conference in Phoenix—there's a conference for everything, it seems—is a prototype of a full color active matrix OLED display from Universal Display Corporation. The display is 4-inches diagonal, .04-inches thick and .2 ounces, and runs full motion video using metal foil, which the company says helps thermal and mechanical durability.

And it rolls up. Neat.

Firm shows off flexible metal foil display [The Inquirer]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=153252&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[More Transparent OLED Madness]]>
The Fraunhofer scientists who developed the transparent OLED technology I told you about on Friday are not the only ones with see-through powers. An outfit called Universal Display Corporate also has the technology, which they have dubbed TOLED. Universal also claims a patent on transparency, but the two technologies are different. Universal has developed a "transparent compound cathode" that can be 70% to 85% transparent. They are already working with Samsung on some neat-o applications, and have a $130,000 agreement with the DOE to develop Novel Smart Windows Based on Transparent Phosphorescent OLED." The Fraunhofer crew has created a light-emitting polymer, and a new type of metal electrode that supplies current to it. This is where my cocktail-napkin knowledge of OLED technology gets soggy. Anyone out there care to fill us in on the differences between these two technologies and why one might be better than the other?

Displays that give a clear view [Fraunhofer]

TOLED Technology Creates New Display Opportunities [Universal Display]

[Thanks, Matt!]

TOLEDscreen.jpg

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=151474&view=rss&microfeed=true