Wouldn't it be simpler to just pre-position spybot/killbot packages in low earth orbit over trouble spots, and then call them in as needed. Sure there's an upfront cost, but it puts them even closer to the action, with the added benefit of no ICBM launches during the actual crisis at hand? #icbm
@Canoehead: its that there upfront cost that would keep this from leaving the drawing board. I mean, imagine if no conflict arose in the region that the military predicted, all that peace would make the designers look like fools (and waste taxpayer money). but this here ICBM idea can be sent anywhere, and we wouldnt have to worry about wasting resources because we would all be dead when the russians launch their nuclear ICBMs in retaliation to our spybot ICBM. #icbm
@minibeardeath: Get richard brandson to put them in low earth orbit. I think he only charges 50k per seat. You could buy the whole cabin in need be. A single tomahawk missile is over $1M, so i expect ICBMs would be much more.
i have no idea if i'm being sarcastic or not
I think the problem was first brought to light with the 1990s Clinton-uses-a-cruise-missile-to-kill-a-camel-and-a-tent "strikes" against Al Qeada. The US used Tomahawks, which are essentially very small subsonic aircraft, launched from off the Pakistani coast. Of course, they had to warn the Pakistanis that they were on the way(don't want to start an accidental nuke war between India and Pakistan), and the missiles' low cruise speed gave the Pakistanis plenty of time to warn Bin Laden and for Bin Laden to decamp. #icbm
There's like an adult back, it's someone has zero defends my sense an adult back, it's like and no air play, it just offense an adult hitting fundamentally unfair about should I cheer for rockets to him?
There's someone has zero defense or rockets to hitting someone from 2000 feet with a huge cannon when that someone from 20000 feet with a kid, yeah he'll with a kid, yeah he'll with a huge cannon when that should I cheer force or hit back, it
@jonesy08: It would be best deployed over populations that don't have an airforce capable of defeating ours. That's everyone. It would also be handy flying over our own cities. I'm buying a tinfoil hat now thanks.
GitEmSteveDave_woot'sOffSoHard promoted this comment
Edited by PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: at 09/23/09 4:48 PM
PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was starred
PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was unstarred
@GitEmSteveDave_woot'sOffSoHard: Best large-caliber sniper rifle is effective up to 1.5 miles. To take down this thing, you'd need an 88mm. Not even a Stinger missile will fly that high.
BTW, the hit probability of an RPG decreases dramatically as distance increases... at 300m it only has < 30% chance to hit, I think...
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
@qbrad:
11/18/09
#tips
11/17/09
11/18/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/18/09
i have no idea if i'm being sarcastic or not
11/18/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
Don't woorrryyy. This one will be designed with Hello Kitty figures. #icbm
09/24/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
There's someone has zero defense or rockets to hitting someone from 2000 feet with a huge cannon when that someone from 20000 feet with a kid, yeah he'll with a kid, yeah he'll with a huge cannon when that should I cheer force or hit back, it
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
he shoot kid rockets for air play, my sense adult back. then my adult lump, checking you see my sugar lumps.
09/23/09
I didn't know if it was vertigo or someone hitting me with a kid from 20,000 feet.
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
They shoulda used the Airwolf theme song.
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
ohmetimothy: "Seriously how hard would it be to shoot this thing down? Can an RPG go to 20,000 feet?"
09/23/09
BTW, the hit probability of an RPG decreases dramatically as distance increases... at 300m it only has < 30% chance to hit, I think...
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09