Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
06/21/09
Uh, no shit?
It's much easier to have higher household penetration percentage when you have less households.
06/20/09
Yes, broadband is important, and we should aim for 100% penetration eventually. However, we should not base our perceptions based on this ranking alone.
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
but then again, with that kind of haircut maybe he will bring a bit of entertainment with him. yeah on second thought, i wanna be his comment sponsor.
business in the front -- party in the back. long live the mullet!!
06/20/09
Dubai (located, in the UAE) is like one of the most advanced cities on the planet. It also serves as a major business hub for the Middle East/Europe/Africa/Asia.
And that hick in the pic misspelled "MORON".... Friggin' Morons!
06/20/09
06/20/09
We "Americans" spell "moron"... like this you nub M.O.R.O.N...
Do we not teach spelling either?
[www.merriam-webster.com]
[dictionary.reference.com]
06/20/09
you're not supposed to use a p.e.r.i.o.d between each letter. FYI
06/20/09
Ok. I appologize for using "."
I will reiterate...
/crackKnuckles
"M-O-R-A-N-S"
/conforms
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
06/20/09
03/03/09
And I would love to have the e-wallet here.
03/03/09
Personally i prefer Gtalk, but since not many of my friends are willing to let go of their other clients, i use Digsby to stay in touch.
still, good reading!
03/03/09
03/03/09
they are hated.
03/03/09
03/03/09
@MadCrazy: I'm assuming that this stems from the "Technological superpower" comment. Grimace as much as you like from across the pond, it's not an exaggeration.
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
+1 I have the same model, sitting in my bedside table, waiting for a run. Of course I will never install that god-aweful sony software again, so i'm stuck with the music I listened to in 8th/10th grade.
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
The Mini-disc sounds great. You'd think it'd be the next logical step from CD's (like DVD's to Blu-ray).
This was a good list and I thought everything fit but the next gen messaging. There is not one person I know who doesn't use Windows Live/Msn messenger. Most have never heard of AIM
03/03/09
03/03/09
Make that thriving above-ground middle-class public transportation. I imagine the NYC subway system is deep enough at some points that the signals wouldn't be able to pierce down through all the dirt and concrete without underground repeaters being set up.
03/03/09
03/03/09
Seriously? Outdated? What outdated Laserdisc a minute after they came out? VHS? DVD's were barely a pipe dream at this point. MD's weren't outclassed until MP3 players came out.
There's a difference between "Outdated" and "sold miserably in North America". Both techs were technologically superior to anything available.
03/03/09
Laserdiscs had several problems that kept it from going anywhere in the US. VHS prices had finally hit the point where they were readily affordable by the masses, and then LD shows up with the return of $100-per-title pricing. That's okay for a seriously blown-out special edition, but not for general releases.
The discs themselves were huge and cumbersome, which makes disc-killing scratches a persistent danger. And given theose sky-high prices, and the fact that these came stored in sleeves rather than proper cases, it was a tough pill to swallow for most people.
Short runtimes were a mood-killer. Where DVD can get a movie that runs over three hours on a single dual-layer read surface, and VHS could handle about 2.5 hours on an extra-long tape, laserdiscs could only fit about half an hour per side (the extended edition of Lord of the Rings would require 13 double-sided LDs, and that's just for the movies w/ audio commentaries...and buying TV series on LD would require special high-strength flooring).
Finally (and I witnessed this first-hand), the sheer size and weight of these discs created problems that most DVD-owners simply aren't aware of. I had a college film class where the professor rented a laserdisc title out of Chicago. Imagine his (and our) surprise when he stepped up in front of the class and pulled the laserdisc out of the sleeve...to find a hole the size of a quarter punched through the the read surface. Yeah, all that extra weight and size makes it a lot easier to cause catastrophic incidental damage.
In addition to all of those things, I suspect that, due to skipping problems that aren't as much of an issue on DVDs, Laserdiscs were probably set up for a read profile similar to a vinyl record, where you start at one point and simply read in a spiral until the track ends. Put a scratch on the disc, and it's like dropping a brick in the path of ants that are returning to the nest. DVDs split the data up into chunks that are non-adjacent, so even if you lose one chunk, a good player can simply skip to the next one.
03/03/09
I remember back when I was about 10 y/o or so and saw my first LD player I asked, "can you record on it?" When I found out that the answer was "no", I didn't want one anymore.
Despite relative low quality with VHS, the fact is that you just had to buy one machine to both play videos from the store and to record your own (and to play back home movies, too).
And remember the quality of the average TV back then? It wasn't exactly killer, and so comparing VHS to Laserdisc wasn't quite so dramatic. (I'm talking about the average home here, not the videophile's home theater).