<![CDATA[Gizmodo: vhs]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: vhs]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/vhs http://gizmodo.com/tag/vhs <![CDATA[Rewind to Sender]]> I gave a letter to the postman, he put it his sack. Bright in early next morning, he brought my letter back. She wrote upon it: Rewind to sender, address unknown. The VHS mailbox. [There I Fixed It via Obsolete]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5384766&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[VHS iPhone Case Does Not Require You To Be Kind, Rewind]]> I'm not really into phone cases, but retro shapes like NES controllers, classic Macs, Playstation consoles and VHS tapes are hard to ignore.

If you insist on encouraging this trend, the VHS iPhone case is available in limited quantities for $25. [Etsy via iPhone Savior via Gearfuse]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5322164&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Dirty Backstabbing Mess Called Betamax vs VHS]]> You think you enjoyed Blu-ray vs HD DVD? Memory Stick vs SD? Pshaw! You haven't seen a format war until you've witnessed the betrayal and bloodbath that was Betamax vs VHS.

Sony was supposed to win this. The company made magnetic tape out of like paper and mud back in the 1940s, turned out a "pocketable" transistor radio in the 1950s, and invented the "portable" television by 1960. They had their first video tape recorder by 1963. They weren't the only ones, but they were among the first and best.

The so-called VTR business had a rocky start. The things were hulking bastards, with huge price tags and poor recording capability.

A company called Ampex put out the first "home entertainment" VTR in 1963, only it cost $30,000 in the Neiman Marcus Christmas catalog, and was nicknamed Grant's Tomb because the product manager who thought it up was going to be shoved inside by the company's accountants. (He would have fit, too, the thing was so big.) Sony comes along in the middle of that decade and puts out a $1,200 "portable" VTR that came with a leatherette case and its own TV. It still weighed 65 pounds.

The worst part about these 1960s VTRs was that they were basically reel-to-reel—you had to thread your own 1-inch videotape through spools and stuff, and by the end of the decade, a one-hour spool of tape was like 8 inches in diameter. Can you imagine your TiVo needing 180 spools of videotape to get the job done?

As Sony toiled on the videotape problem, Matsushita—who we now call Panasonic—and its independent subsidiary JVC weren't really standing out in the VTR business. Let's say this: Nobody would have guessed they'd be able to overthrow Sony and kick mecha ass within the decade.

However, these guys were among the biggest manufacturers, dwarfing Sony many times over. Matsushita, known for efficiency, not innovation, tended to focus on big boring appliances—TVs, refrigerators, air conditioners—with a smaller team, branded Technics, devoted to dominating the hi-fi realm. JVC was all about TVs and audio gear, and had decent video know-how.

It was Sony who solved the reel-to-reel problem with—ta daaa!—a video cassette. It was called U-Matic, and at 3/4" thick, it was smaller than the earlier formats, but still a bit of a chunkster. Since video was a bit of a Wild West, Sony felt like it needed partners to firmly establish a format, and to avoid a format war. It asked Matsushita and JVC, who said "yes" as long as Sony adopted some changes. They key here: The partnership included a deal where everybody shared all the patents. Turns out, probably not the smartest move by Sony.

Sony was right to form a posse, though. Every single electronics maker in Japan, Europe and America was trying to build a video recorder. Some American firms were obsessed with lasers (though ironically it would later be the Dutch and Japanese firms who actually put lasers to good use); other American firms were jazzed about microfilm...for video. None of them had success. Before we get on with the story, here's a list of totally failed video players and recorders:

• Matsushita VX-100 and VX-2000
• Matsushita AutoVision
• Toshiba/Sanyo V-Cord
• Ampex InstaVision
• MCA DiscoVision/Magnavox Magnavision
• CBS Electronic Video Recording
• RCA HoloTape
• Sears/Cartridge Television Cartrivision

See what I mean? A friggin' mess it was.

Part of the problem was the message. Nobody knew what the hell this was all about. Sony wasn't just a pioneer in the technology, they thought hard about how to explain why you totally desperately want something bad. At one point, Sony hired Bela Lugosi to dress up one last time as Dracula, and explain that, since he worked nights, he needed to catch up on primetime shows when he got home. Get it? Vampires—they're out killing people when Barney Miller is playing! It was a good bit, and there were a lot more like it. Little by little, the public caught on to what VCRs were for.

Anyway, U-Matic, launched in 1971, wasn't a runaway success, either, but it was the bestselling video recorder to date, and the first successful VCR. In the realm of pro video, it was hot. Sony cashed in by steering from the home market to the businesses but JVC, who kept trying to pitch it for home use, got hosed. Like villains in some Shakespearean play, Matsushita and JVC kinda lurked in the background, planning for the next round when they might one-up that little charmer, Sony. The name of their plot? Video Home System, which you and I call VHS.

Sony was naive. Like, crazy naive. In 1974, it asked Matsushita and JVC to partner up again, this time on a fully baked format called Betamax. They weren't asking for intellectual collaboration, just a deal to make and sell the things. It was a nice system, with really small tapes, but the problem was, the tapes only recorded for an hour. Sony was like, "That's not a problem," but everyone else was like, "Yes, it is." The would-be partners dragged their heels suspiciously, not signing any deals. Sony kinda thought that was weird, but went ahead and launched the one-hour Betamax box in 1975.

Big mistake.

Not long after Sony went into wide release with the one-hour Betamax, JVC pulled a two-hour VHS out of its butt. And in time for Christmas 1976 no less. Sony had another flash of naivete when it pressed on with the one-hour system for a while, even though it had a two-hour system in the works. In that gap, JVC and its big poppa Matsushita scored sales and recognition.

Some people say Betamax was "better" but that depends on many factors, and could very well be an urban myth. The technologies were so close Sony's own chairman called VHS a copy of Betamax. What may have looked good in one system with certain settings might not look as good on another with different settings. And by some accounts, Betamax's more moving parts meant they were more expensive to manufacture and more costly to maintain and repair. It's not an open-and-shut case of quantity vs. quality. Either way you look at it, there are compromises.

By this point, it wasn't just some anything-goes contest with a million formats. By 1976, all those above had died or were dying. In Japan, there were just two choices. The Japanese government told everyone to sort it out. Hitachi, Mitsubishi and Sharp joined Team VHS, but didn't really move forward.

In February 1977, Sony grabbed Toshiba and Sanyo, and then signed the American powerhouse brand Zenith up for an order of Sony-made Betamaxes with the Zenith name on them. Was it going to happen for Betamax after all? Seemed like they'd finally drawn at least a few good cards from the deck.

Sony might not have been totally screwed at that moment, but there were two American powerhouses, and the other one, RCA, was undecided. Ironically, the fate of the Japanese VCR industry relied on how well it could handle the most American of sports: Football. In other words, now that both players could manage two hours of recording time, what RCA wanted was enough recording time to capture a game—three hours would do.

What transpired next is unclear. Even though, at the time, both technologies were limited to two-hour capacity, Matsushita pledged to make RCA tape machines that could record for four hours.

Was this a lie? Was it vaporware? Whatever the deal, JVC engineers pulled off a four-hour capacity six weeks later, and RCA agreed to buy 55,000 machines that year, and up to a million more in the next three years. Better yet, RCA's SelectaVision VHS decks would cost $300 less than the two-hour Betamaxes, at $1000 a pop.

Although Betamax hung on for a bit longer, that, boys and girls, was the end of the competition. In 1979, Sony market share tilted downward, and by 1980, the jig was up for those poor bastards.

Note: I recognize that there are other issues that might have come into play here, including Universal's lawsuit of Sony, which lead to today's Supreme Court definition of fair-use copyright law, and the fact that some studios, including Warner, began squeezing movies onto videotape early, with varying degrees of success. However, I contend that none of that changed the outcome—the war above was fought between Sony and Matsushita, and Matsushita won.

SOURCES:
Fast Forward: Hollywood, The Japanese, and the VCR Wars - James Lardner (Special thanks to you, Jim, for chatting me through some of this)
Sony - John Nathan
The History of Television - Albert Abramson
Sony History - Sony Global Website
Made in Japan - Akio Morita
Quest for Prosperity - Konosuke Matsushita
[PDF] Case Report on Betamax - Verardi et al
"Why VHS was better than Betamax" - Guardian UK - Jack Schofield

Gizmodo '79 is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5316722&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Video Piracy Was Big Business In 1979]]> Back in the day, new fangled VHS technology opened up a world of piracy and paranoia that we are abundantly familiar with today. The only difference was that many pirates were making big, big bucks.

As you will see in the following hard-hitting 60 Minutes report on the state of video piracy in 1979, insiders with access to films were able to command as much as $1000 ($3,308 with inflation) for masters that were later copied and sold by resellers for between $50 and $500 a pop ($155 to $1654 with inflation). Apparently the novelty of watching a movie in your home was enough to justify the expense at a time when a movie ticket cost $3 or less.


"60 Minutes" on Video Piracy - 1979 - part 1 of 2
by videohollic

"60 Minutes" on Video Piracy - 1979 - part 2 of 2
by videohollic

"They said it would happen, and it has. The day when you could go to the movies without leaving your living room!"

Gizmodo '79 is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5315327&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[VHS Cover Wall Is 3600-Strong, May or May Not Have A Tanning Salon Out Back]]> Our children may never get to experience the revelatory joy of wandering through the miles of barely organized VHS shelves of a sleepy local video store, but at least they'll have this. [3600 via Metafilter]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5219297&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[VHS Toaster Eats Breakfast, Not Tapes]]> There are mods and there are Mods. And the VHS Toaster definitely fits into the capitalized category. (Read on for video.)

The marriage of a Daewoo VHS deck and a Swan Elegance single-slot toaster, the only way it could be better is if it burned little tape spools into the toast. DVDs could work too, you know, if the toaster were completely self-loathing. [Instructables via Hack-a-Day]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5154274&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Video Formats: Happy 200th Birthday, Charles Darwin]]>

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5152514&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Windertech Tape Rewinder Lets You Rewind Your VHS Tapes Over the Internet]]> While VHS might be dead, according to former Colbert Report/Daily Show writer Eric Drysdale, tape rewinders are alive and well, brimming with new features designed for the internet age. [Funny or Die]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5115772&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Last Major VHS Retailer Abandons the Format]]> While we know that media formats will come and go (be they physical or purely digital), the death of VHS is one of particular weight. Players have died, now tapes have, too.

While major retailers have long since ditched VHS for the space-friendly DVD alternative, Distribution Video Audio was the last major supplier of VHS, supporting part of their $20 million a year business by selling mass amounts of VHS tapes on the cheap. With little fanfare last October, the company shipped their last truckload of VHS. From the company's president:

It's dead, this is it, this is the last Christmas, without a doubt. I was the last one buying VHS and the last one selling it, and I'm done. Anything left in warehouse we'll just give away or throw away.

Rather than rewrite the whole story, I'll just point you to the LA Times and assure you that it's a great, be it sad, read. The format that popularized replaying, archiving and sharing media is but the stuff of collections. Luckily, it's been replaced by some pretty incredible alternatives. [LA Times and image]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5115644&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Stubborn, Old, Crotchety JVC Finally Ceases Standalone VCR Production]]> Formats never truly die, but their eras always have a few painful stages of decline. First, there's the arrival of a promising new competitor, then its steady rise, which is invariably followed by a mourning period and the final purging of last-gen products from the market. The last stage of obsolescence for of the long-presumed-dead format is upon us: JVC has announced that production of their single remaining player will stop immediately.

The JVC player was probably only ever intended to service old, supplementary collections of tapes, but my romantic side hopes that at least one person will see this news and think "Aww, shucks, I guess it's finally.time to get one of those Dee-Vee-Dee players." As a comfort to those people, JVC (like others) will continue to offer a few combination players, and at least plans on selling its standalone VCRs until inventory runs out. [TradingMarkets via BBG]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5069683&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dual Blu-ray/VHS Player is 50% Obsolete Out of the Box]]> Much like Master/Blaster, the Mad Max villain which consisted of a gigantic retarded guy with a smart little midget on its back, the Sharp Aquos BD-HDv22 combines the smart and the stupid in one bulky package. How so? Well, it's a combination of a Blu-ray player/recorder and a VHS player/recorder. No, not DVD, VHS. You know, just in case you want to convert your collection of movies taped off HBO from the early 90s you have in a box in your basement to Blu-ray. How much will this monstrosity cost you, what with its decades-spanning techs brutally crammed together? $1,100, due to be released on October 20th. I'll take two! [CrunchGear via Boing Boing Gadgets]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5050803&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Panasonic's DMR-BR630V Blu-ray Disc Recorder Does VHS Tapes Too]]> A Blu-ray disc recorder and a VHS video tape machine may seem unlikely bedfellows, but that hasn't stopped Panasonic from wrapping them up together in the same box for the DMR-BR630V. The 630V can write BDRs at six times speed, has digital and analog tuners, new second-gen MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 encoder chips as well as all the standard HDMI and analog connections and Panasonic's Viera link for device interconnectivity. It also records to DVD. There's even a 320GB hard drive inside, capable of recording video and later letting you dub it onto BDR or VHS. You'll have to wait until October 1st for its Japanese release, though, if you're absolutely desperate to get your collection of low-res, blurry Friends VHS tapes safely transferred onto spiffy high-res BDRs. And it'll cost you around $1,450 for the privilege. [AVWatch]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041206&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[DIY Glowing Video Tape USB Hub: Put an Old VHS Tape to Good Use]]> Have any old VHS tapes lying around? Really? What the hell is wrong with you? That stuff should have been tossed ages ago. Anyway, since you have one, it might be a good idea to repurpose it into something useful—like a USB hub. As far as DIY projects go, this one should be simple enough—even for a novice. All you need outside of the tape is a USB hub, some LEDs, a small switch (optional) and some cables. It looks cool, and when all is said and done you can act all high and mighty about your herculean recycling effort. Additional image after the break.

vhs-usb-hub-2.jpgFor the full instructions, hit the following link. [Instructables via Hacked Gadgets]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386776&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Ion Audio's VCR2PC USB VHS Ripper Digitizes Your Old Saved By the Bell Episodes]]> Having mastered the art of turning your vinyls into digital music, Ion Audio turns its attention to your old VHS collection that's been sitting in your garage since 2002. For $249, you're able to shove your old cassettes in the front, which then gets digitized and fed into your PC via USB. There's also a composite connection in the back in case you actually want to use this thing to WATCH VHS tapes instead of archiving them for future enjoyment. This kind of thing seems very much like a one-time-use machine, lending itself more suited to arrangements where you and three of your buddies chip in for one and pass them around when you're done. [zzounds via Everything USB]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382669&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[David Pogue Rescues Our Old Home Movies]]> Looks like David Pogue got himself a TV show and one of the topics discussed was transferring content from dying formats like VHS to longevity-unproven formats like DVD. Essentially, Pogue finds out that commercial transferring services are pretty terrible (they usually don't color correct) and the only way to accurately transfer stuff from actual movie reels is to pay an arm and a leg to NASA scientists (or just about). He does bring up a good point about storing our priceless content an any of the formats du jour.

How long will DVDs last? Nobody really knows, that's why archiving our precious moments on them might be foolish in the long run. Also, since formats change all the time (storing data on punch cards wasn't all that long ago), it may be silly to try to think that once your movies are on DVD, they're good forever. The moral of the story? You're screwed.

Saving Home Movies From Disappearing Formats [New York Times Blog]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218645&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Happy Birthday VHS!]]> It was only 30 years ago this week that JVC received a IEEE milestone for development of the VHS Video along with releasing the first VHS player. You kicked that Betamax's ass right to the curb and you can celebrate three decaded later by watching HD DVD kick another Sony proprietary media to the curb, Blu-Ray.

I wasn't even alive at the time of your birth, but you still managed to kick-start my life of stealing video media with the help of recordable formats, like VHS. Some companies may still make VHS players, or combo players, but it is inevitable that you have died. Rest in peace VHS, rest in peace.

To celebrate the life of the VHS, I ask you, the readers, to share your favorite VHS memories. My favorite memories were when I was a kid—I turned the VHS player into a secret cave/hideout for my Ninja Turtles. My mom got pissed that I was cramming Ninja Turtles in the VHS player, but she got over it.

Happy Thirtieth Birthday to the VHS Video Format [Gizmag]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=206791&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[JVC DR-MV7S Upscales VHS—VH...What?]]> Maybe if I had a time machine I could go back in time to figure out what the hell VHS is. Apparently it was a black box that you insert into a deck and it played movies? Then you had to...rewind it? What the f.

Well whatever this nonsense is, you can now watch it in semi-HD with this upscaling combination VHS/DVD-recorder from JVC. It will upscale VHS to 1080i that will likely look mediocre at best, especially if home movies are being watched. Also, if you feel so intrigued, the player can record your crappy VHS recordings of The Golden Girls onto DVD. But, easily the coolest aspect of this $270 player is the fact that you can now tell people that you watched your Jurrasic Park VHS through HDMI.

VCR lets you upscale VHS to HD; no one cares [SCI FI]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=202282&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gizmodo Japan: AQUOS Vision Recorder]]> Sharp announced the DV-ARV22, as latest model in the AQUOS HD recorder series. Apparently it is the world‘s thinnest (3.74 inches) VHS video recorder/player, HDD (250GB) and DVD player in one device. It features a HDMI port, terrestrial digital tuner and analog tuner. It also starts up in 1 second for instant recording. You can also copy video six ways between the HDD, DVD and VHS recorders. Should be out in March for about $1278.

News Release [Sharp]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=152652&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[eBay Deal of the Day: Boeing B-52 Bomb and Rocket Control Panel]]> The "gadget-girls" over at eBay have managed to get their hands on a nice piece of vintage memorabilia for all of those interested in death and destruction. This is the bomb and rocket control panel that was once in a B-52. Surprisingly this control panel is in excellent condition. All knobs and switches are in functional order and the paint job is also well done. This gem came from a former Boeing engineer, but unfortunately there is no data or information tag on the panel for more specific identification. The potential with this is endless. This shows usage anywhere from case modding to a coffee table piece.

GSS: 0 - Generally Calm

WWII Boeing B-52 29 Aircraft Bomb Rocket Control Panel [eBay]

UPDATE - James writes:

Yo! How could this be a WWII B-52 device? The B-52 didn t go into use until 1955.
]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=114611&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[eBay Deal of the Day: Blinging Maxell VHS Necklace]]> Be the first bad boi on the block to sport this hot Maxell VHS Tape Necklace. It's bigger than Flava Flav's clocks, even. Even Nelly's beautiful Nelly necklace can't stand up to the glare coming off this handsome, yet stylishly understated, piece of jewelry/obsolete video recording medium.

The story of how this eBay seller found this treasure is worth the price of a click itself.

*BLING* Video Tape Necklace!!! *BLING* [eBay]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=113645&view=rss&microfeed=true