<![CDATA[Gizmodo: Viacom]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: Viacom]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/viacom http://gizmodo.com/tag/viacom <![CDATA[ Google to Mask Data Before Handover, YouTubers Now Safe From Viacom ]]> In the ongoing legal kerfuffle between Viacom and Google, it was beginning to look like Youtube users were going to take the fall for the Goog. Privacy advocates cried foul when a judge ruled that Google had to turn over the IP addresses and user IDs of the viewers for every YouTube video to Viacom, but in a document filed yesterday both companies agreed to mask the user data, assigning arbitrary identifiers to users in lieu of actual info. The masking system will likely be similar to AOL's hilarious botched search dataset experiment two years ago, but I'd say a public release of this data is unlikely. [Ars]

]]>
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:56:35 EDT John Herrman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025503&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ YouTube Forced to Reveal Username and IP Address of Every Video Watched ]]> Remember Viacom suing YouTube and Google for one BILLION dollars eons ago? That's still going on! And while a judge ruled yesterday that while Google doesn't have to reveal its secret search sauce to the multimedia giantface, he did grant Viacom's request for YouTube to turn over records of "every video watch by YouTube users," and that includes their username and IP address. Yeah that's right, Viacom will know every time you watch "Pork n Beans" or need to refuel your day with Powerthirst. (Or watch Viacom's The Daily Show, you bastard.) And like that, the illusion of YouTube privacy was gone. [YouTube]

]]>
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:31:53 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021838&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yahoo Dumps Music Service, Sends Customers to Rhapsody ]]> Yahoo_Music_RIP.jpgAs if it hasn't been a rough enough patch for Yahoo, the company just announced that it would be ditching its iffy attempt at all-you-can-eat DRM music, Yahoo! Music Unlimited, and turn what subscribers it does have over to Rhapsody. This is good news for people who may have signed up for Yahoo before reading reviews; in our observations, Rhapsody is a much better service. The only thing that strikes fear in us, from the press release: "A simple process...will convert Yahoo! Music Unlimited subscribers' music libraries to Rhapsody." Uhhh, just don't call it ConvertsForSure, okay? Thanks. Press release after jump.

RHAPSODY AND YAHOO! ANNOUNCE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP IN DIGITAL MUSIC

Yahoo! to Exclusively Offer and Promote Rhapsody for On-Demand Music Services

SUNNYVALE, CA AND SEATTLE - February 4, 2008 - Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) and Rhapsody® America, the award winning digital music service of RealNetworks® (RNWK) and Viacom's (NYSE:VIA and VIA.B) MTV Networks, today announced a broad strategic relationship in digital music. Rhapsody will be the exclusive on-demand music service for Yahoo!, replacing Yahoo! Music Unlimited. Yahoo! Music and Rhapsody also intend to collaborate on other digital music services such as music downloads. The partnership introduces Rhapsody's award-winning subscription music service to the largest online music audience through Yahoo! Music and reinforces Yahoo!'s focus on providing users with a destination to easily access the best music services and content from across the web.

In the coming months, Yahoo! Music Unlimited subscribers will be migrated to Rhapsody's digital music service through a simple process that will convert Yahoo! Music Unlimited subscribers' music libraries to Rhapsody. Current Yahoo! Music subscribers will have the opportunity to maintain their existing pricing tiers for a limited time period after migration to the Rhapsody service. Additional details will be communicated to Yahoo! Music subscribers closer to the date when account migration begins.

"By partnering with Yahoo!, we are connecting Rhapsody's 'jukebox in the sky' with one of the biggest music audiences on the web," said Rob Glaser, chairman and CEO of RealNetworks. "Soon, tens of millions of Yahoo users will be able to access their favorite music through Rhapsody - wherever they go, whenever they want it."

"This agreement allows Yahoo! to continue its focus on being the Internet's leading starting point by creating an indispensable music experience that will drive music fans to Yahoo! first on their path to music discovery," said Scott Moore, Senior Vice President and Head of Media, Yahoo!.

The partnership coincides with an announcement by Yahoo! that it has acquired FoxyTunes, the company that developed a popular toolbar plug-in that enables users to control more than 30 desktop and Web-based music players. FoxyTunes also allows users to easily find lyrics, videos, bios and more, based on what is currently playing in a user's media player. By giving Yahoo! users an easy and agnostic tool with which to control and play music, FoxyTunes' functionality across multiple music sources and services also furthers Yahoo!'s goal to be more open. To read more about this announcement, please visit Yahoo!'s corporate blog at yodel.yahoo.com.

"Our partnership with Rhapsody, the acquisition of FoxyTunes and the release of the web-based Yahoo! Media Player moves Yahoo! Music closer to our goal of enabling users to play all of the music on the Web," said Ian Rogers, Vice President of Video and Media Applications, Yahoo!. "But, it doesn't end there, Yahoo! Music will continue to innovate and forge new ways to marry music content with the rich content of the Internet."

"Rhapsody connects fans with more music, in more ways and through more devices than any other on-demand music service," said Neil Smith, Vice President of Marketing for Rhapsody America. "As an unlimited access, on-demand service, Rhapsody is a perfect complement to Yahoo!'s vibrant Yahoo!Music site."


]]>
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:32:58 EST Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352187&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Hollywood Puppet Congressdude Wants Harder, More Draconian DMCA With No Safe Harbor ]]> palpatines.jpgWhile overseeing a hearing on the PRO-IP Act, a bill that might make statutory damages for copyright infringement even more obscene, Rep. Howard Berman, who chairs the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, pondered out loud about other ridiculous copyright stuff he wants to do. Like make the DMCA an even more horrible piece of legislation by neutering its safe harbor provisions.

Like the ones protecting ISPs from getting sued because no-no content whisks through their tubes and that basically form YouTube's lifeline. He also wants to consider making content filtering mandatory, like the insane whole-network one AT&T's thinking about firing up.

Needless to say, this would make Hollywood happier than fecal-eating pigs in shit—Viacom's been fighting YouTube's safe harbor claims in its ongoing lawsuit, for instance. If the safe harbor provisions were strung out, YouTube really would be blasted out of existence, along with any other site that puts up user-generated content. Not that any of that matters more than the almighty dollar to the studios. [Ars]

]]>
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:00:25 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333822&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Every Episode of <i>South Park</i> Ever Being Put Online for Free Next Year ]]> Earlier this year, Viacom put every Daily Show episode online for free, and it was awesome. Now, they're following suit with South Park, with plans to put every episode of the animated series online for free next year.

It's a ballsier move than putting The Daily Show online, as South Park sells lots of DVDs, and these episodes will directly compete with episodes available for sale in stores. The Daily Show is less valuable as it gets older, as it's news-based, so putting episodes that poke fun of Ralph Nader online wasn't as much of a risk. If successful, look for more MTV and Comedy Central shows to get this treatment (The State! Please!). The more free TV shows online the better, as far as we're concerned. We'd like it if they spread the love and made all these episodes available to other players such as Joost, but I guess we should be happy with what we get. [Reuters]

]]>
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:15:16 EST Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328568&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Daily Show</i> Writers Use Viacom's YouTube Suit to Hilariously Explain the Strike ]]> Because of the WGA strike, there's no Daily Show, which sucks. But if you think you're suffering, think of how the writers of that wonderful program feel! In this video that the writers of our favorite mock newscast made on the picketline, they clearly explain why this strike is happening and how the studio chiefs are total hypocrites. And they have a point! I mean, how can Viacom go around suing YouTube for one billion dollars and then turn around and say there's no money to be made on the internet? Scumbags! [Defamer]

]]>
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:01:00 EST Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323378&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Viacom, Disney, Microsoft and Others Form Justice League of Copyright ]]> A smorgasborg of media companies—Viacom, Disney, News Corp., NBC Universal, CBS, and others, including Microsoft—have formed a coalition laying out guidelines for protecting copyrights online. Their "principles" include using technology to wipe out copyright no-no content generated by users, as well as shutting it out before it hits the public intertubes. You'll notice GooTube isn't part of the list—they're not of the pre-emptive blockage philosophy, as of yet. However, some analysts think Google will have to play ball if their guidelines do become an actual standard.

"Once an industry initiative is formed, Google will be forced to accept the common model rather than use its own solution as a competitive differentiator," Forrester Research analyst James McQuivey said. "The pressure on Google to go along with this cooperative initiative will be intense, as the fate of existing lawsuits will likely hinge on Google's acceptance of the common solution."
If anyone can resist pressure, however, it's probably Google. The question is, "How badly do they wanna join the club?" [NewTeeVee, Reuters, UGC Principles] ]]>
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:30:24 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312616&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Viacom CEO Still All About DRM, Will Hopefully Retire Soon ]]> dauman.jpgWhile it seems like many sensible companies have realized that DRM doesn't curb piracy and just pisses off their customers, it appears that Viacom didn't get the memo. Today, CEO Philippe Dauman whined to the US Chamber of Commerce that it's too easy to copy media and that companies should be using stronger, more widespread DRM and watermarking. He also wants ISPs and hosting companies to work with companies to snitch on pirates and turn them in to the Copyright Gestapo. Just give it up already, people. The tides are turning. Don't fight it. It's for your own good. [Crave]

]]>
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:31:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306242&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Viacom Putting All of Daily Show Online ]]> johnstewart_gamers.jpgWhether it was the cause of or the reaction to their $1 billion lawsuit against Google, Viacom will be launching TheDailyShow.com with the entire back catalog of Stewart clips available for viewing (we're assuming for free). It's a progressive move by Viacom, and hopefully the clips aren't so chock full of ads that we can't enjoy them properly. Of course, that won't be true if MTV.com's full 30 second intro ads are any indication.

It's brilliant, really. Cutting shows into individual clips, Viacom probably feeds users more ads per content minute online than on television. [nytimes]

]]>
Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:05:04 EDT Mark Wilson http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297809&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ RIAA, Viacom, Microsoft and Others Form <strike>Galactic Empire</strike> Copyright Alliance ]]> It is a period of civil war. Pirate torrents, striking from hidden basements, have plundered the vaults of Hollywood movie studios, the recording industry, and software monoliths, who have now formed the COPYRIGHT ALLIANCE. During the battle, pirates managed to steal copyrighted material as well as the not-so-secret plans of their LOBBYISTS and LEGAL TEAMS, with enough power to lobby and sue an entire planet.

Pursued by the newly formed COPYRIGHT ALLIANCE, composed of 29 entities, such as Viacom, Microsoft, Disney, MPAA and RIAA, pirates raced home aboard their mopeds and bicycles, custodians of cracked copies of Windows Vista and bootlegs of Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, looking to save their people and restore freedom software, movies and music to the galaxy.

Backers of stronger copyright laws form lobby group [CNET via Techdirt]

]]>
Fri, 18 May 2007 12:56:36 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261704&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ YouTube Leashed: "Claim Your Content" Is On Its Way ]]> YouTubeLock.jpgIt may sound like a game show for accountants, but Claim Your Content is actually the name of YouTube's new content monitoring tool. As near as we can figure, it's an automated feature that accompanies every user-uploaded video. Content owners, including such publicly announced Claim Your Content charter members as the NHL and the NBA, will have the right to log in and yank any content that they feel is an infringement of copyright.

Now, we will be eager to see exactly how this yanking process works, and if there is any room in it for protest, deliberation or out-and-out legal confrontation. Frankly, an automated censoring product seems a little bit scary. What is clear at this point is that this is Google's way of appeasing some of the angrier content owners who have already taken action. According to a wire report, Google CEO Eric Schmidt said today that the tool may at least help play down the allegation that YouTube encourages copyright infringement. "As that product rolls out, the issue becomes moot," said Schmidt.

Sure, but then what's to become of TIME's Person of the Year???

Google's copyright-protection tool unveiled [CNNMoney.com]

]]>
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:40:00 EDT www.gizmodo.com http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=253113&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Viacom's Hypocrisy Could Defuse YouTube Lawsuit ]]> Anyone checked out iFilm lately? Ars Technica did, and found several videos that were guilty of copyright infringement. Were any Viacom videos part of that roundup? Nope, because Viacom owns iFilm. Wait, what's that you say? Viacom couldn't possibly own a company that violates others' copyrights because right now they're suing YouTube for a billion dollars for doing just that?

Ars followed up to ask if they take the same active measures to identify copyright-molesting content that they're asking YouTube to follow, but naturally didn't get a response from either iFilm or Viacom. They also talked to a copyright attorney, who said that because Viacom's essentially asking for a "new interpretation of the DMCA" in its lawsuit (YouTube follows the current interpretation), and there's no precedent for a judge to follow, "Viacom's own conduct with iFilm will likely be a factor that the judge looks at."

What's that delicious taste I suddenly I have in my mouth? Oh wait, I think I know what it is—sweet, sweet irony.

Infringing videos on iFilm could cause problems for Viacom [Ars Technica]
Image via Flickr

]]>
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:30:46 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=245464&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Google: "What Lawsuit?" ]]> youtube_dearjohn.jpgGoogle is not easily intimidated. If a gigantic corporation sued me for $1 billion, I would probably drop a load in my pants and offer to do anything — and I mean anything — to get out of it. But Google? They aren't scared of Viacom or their attention-grabbing lawsuit.
"This is an area of law where there are a bunch of really clear precedents, so Amazon and eBay have both been found to qualify for the safe harbor and there are a whole bunch more. We will continue to innovate and continue to host material for people, without being distracted by this suit."
Cold-blooded!

Crunchgear [via Reuters]

]]>
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:30:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=244472&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Viacom to Google: You Owe Us $1 Billion ]]> youtube_dearjohn.jpgViacom is getting pissed off at YouTube, and has decided to shakedown its parent company Google Inc. for $1 billion in damages for stealing its programming. Viacom says there are more than 160,000 clips of its programming on YouTube, including segments from VH1, Nickelodeon and especially Comedy Central.

The dustup is getting ugly, with Viacom spitting out invective left and right, whining that YouTube "built a lucrative business out of exploiting the devotion of fans to others' creative works in order to enrich itself and its corporate parent Google."

There they go again, the old guard clinging to antiquated business models. It'll work for a while.

Viacom sues Google, YouTube for $1 billion [MSNBC]

]]>
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:05:00 EDT Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=243798&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ BBC Bringing Crumpets, Three New Channels With Ads to YouTube ]]> youtubebbc.jpgApparently, YouTube's been quite busy behind the scenes, despite being shunned by Viacom. The NYT reports that they've managed to line up over 1,000 partnerships with content providers at a pace of 200 a quarter, most of them smaller, independent outlets.

The big fish in the growing pond though is the BBC, which YouTube has locked up for a multi-year deal to create two entertainment channels and a news channel. Interestingly, the news and one of the entertainment channels will have ads placed by AdSense. According to the BBC, there will "possibly pre-roll adverts (shown as part of the video clip) as well." On top of that, because of the ads, the news channel will be off-limits to UKers because it's ad-supported.

I'm suddenly not as psyched as I was when I first read the headline...

Google Courts Small YouTube Deals, and Very Soon, a Larger One [NYT]
BBC strikes Google-YouTube deal [BBC]

]]>
Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:00:15 EST Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240983&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Viacom Jilted YouTube for Joost, Google Crying Itself to Sleep ]]> Why did Viacom abruptly demand 100,000 of its videos be removed from YouTube? Turns out Viacom had other plans for its videos and films: tons of viacom_joost.jpgits content was on its way to another Internet video service: the hi-buzz peer-to-peer service called Joost. Suspicions arose when beta testers noticed a plethora of Viacom clips on the nascent Joost, the beta project with more clips than users thus far.

The Wall Street Journal says a licensing deal between Viacom Inc. and Joost is in the offing, where thousands of hours of Viacom content will be licensed, including programming from Viacom cable networks such as MTV and Comedy Central, and movies from Viacom's Paramount as well. This sets the stage for a battle royale between Internet titans, all fighting for nothing short of world domination of the next generation of home entertainment.


Niklas Zennstrm and Janus Friis, the two founders of Joost, also started up two peer-to-peer networks: file-sharing service Kazaa and slam-dunk Internet phone company Skype, and have done well for themselves. Awash in $2.69 billion in cash from their sale of Skype to eBay, the two are having no trouble financing their new Joost venture, which originally was called the Venice Project. Joost can now flourish even further with this new shot in the arm, adding Viacom to the Warner Music Corp. already on board.

Viacom to license content to Joost [Reuters]

]]>
Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:18:16 EST Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=238028&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ More Execs Bring the Hate for YouTube ]]> Fresh off the Viacom slap, NBC Universal's Jeff Zucker and News Corp.'s Rupert Murdoch lined up to take their shots at GooTube.

Zucker whines that "YouTube needs to prove that it will implement its filtering technology across its online platform. It's proven it can do it when it wants to." It sounds strange, considering NBC has an official deal with YouTube, but not when you consider how wishy-washy NBC has been, pulling clips not officially uploaded by the channel.

Murdoch's criticism is more of the same old, same old: "How do you monetize it?" It's still the question du jour for sure. Then again YouTube's founders, who each walked away with over $320 million seem pretty monetized.

NBC blasts Google's YouTube over copyright [CNET]
Murdoch the latest media mogul to take on YouTube [CNET]

]]>
Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:25:48 EST Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=235165&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Viacom Bullies YouTube Into Removing 100,000 Videos ]]> jonstewart2.jpgThis weekend Viacom decided to throw some weight around, sending 100,000 DMCA notices to YouTube, telling them to take down any clip that came up when any of their shows were searched for. That not only means that clips from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report will be harder to come by now, but that clips even coincidentally titled similarly to any Viacom property have been taken down.

With that volume of requests, Google doesn't have the manpower to check to see if all of the clips are actually copyrighted material. And it seems like Viacom just told them to remove everything that came up during certain searches, meaning they didn't verify each clip either. Yes, two gigantic companies are working together to censor online videos, with neither of them actually bothering to make sure they aren't removing thousands upon thousands of legitimate content. They're throwing the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak.

This is terrible, and Google needs to pony up the dough to make sure their service isn't being completely perverted by these corporate thugs. And hey, Viacom: screw you. This kind of severe, anti-consumer action is not how you win loyalty.

Viacom terrorizes YouTube with bullshit DMCA notices [Boing Boing]
Viacom yanks Daily Show from Youtube [ValleyWag]

]]>
Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:45:00 EST Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=234001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Network Fogies Getting Into YouTube-Like Racket ]]> What do NBC, News Corp., CBS, and Viacom have in common? YouTube. In an effort to dethrone their young Web-based competition, they're joining forces on a new venture/website that would host videos from their respective video vaults. This in turn would draw traffic away from YouTube, and put extra cash in the already fat pockets of TV execs. The problem is....

each company has their own hidden agenda/reason for launching a YouTube competitor. News Corp, for instance, is doing this to sink YouTube before it draws more traffic away from MySpace (which is owned by News Corp.), whereas CBS on the other hand sees this as a way of getting closer to Google, who they're trying to strike a separate deal with on a completely different venture. The YouTube "killer" could be announced as early as this week. The question is—do you care or will YouTube remain being your personal TiVo?

Old Model Versus a Speedster [NYT]

]]>
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:14:38 EST Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222729&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ MTV Networks Announces TV for iPods ]]> punkdseasonone1_01.jpg

Not a huge surprise that Viacom has decided to give Apple a chance, and announced that 14 TV shows will soon be available on the iTunes Music Store from MTV, MTV2, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon and The N. Look for faves like Ashton Kutcher wearing his hat sideways on Punk'd, as well as others such as South Park, Dora the Explorer, SpongeBob SquarePants and Laguna Beach. Here's to watching more content while on the run!

iTunes [Apple]

]]>
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:19:09 EST tgrumet http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=151131&view=rss&microfeed=true