<![CDATA[Gizmodo: Video-on-Demand]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: Video-on-Demand]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/video-on-demand http://gizmodo.com/tag/video-on-demand <![CDATA[ Amazon Video On Demand Begins Sony Bravia Link Beta, Gets More PC/Mac Features ]]> We've known Amazon and Sony's VOD plans since they were in diapers, but today Amazon has introduced their promised instant-view capabilities to their Video on Demand service for both Macs and PCs, and rolled out a beta for Sony Bravia Link owners to start testing—allowing you to pair your TV with your Amazon account for instant purchases and rentals. Your purchases are also automatically added to "Your Video Library" for instant streams from any web browser. [Amazon]

]]>
Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:58:27 EDT John Mahoney http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045243&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dish Network Will Broadcast in 1080p, Streaming Blu-ray Quality Video Now Possible (But Unlikely) ]]> Dish Network is upgrading their boxes' firmware to display 1080p resolution. Given the lack of 1080p network source material, the existing 720p/1080i compressed HD signals, and the fact that there's no standard limiting the compression quality—1080p can be compressed to crap like any other picture—it's tough to believe this is going to be really useful for consumers. But maybe we are mistaken, because the company actually thinks that their 1080p quality is on par with Blu-ray discs:

Starting August 1, the recent blockbuster "I Am Legend" starring Will Smith will be available in Blu-ray™ disc quality 1080p resolution, only on DISH Network's VOD service, DISH On Demand, at a discounted price.

Yes. Dish Network is actually promising I Am Legend in "Blu-ray™ disc quality 1080p resolution" over Video on Demand. Presumably streamed in real time, it would be a technological feat even if not part of normal programming. And while we bet Dish will make the image look as good as possible under the pressure to show off, whether or not it's truly as stunning as a Blu-ray disc or meets some minimum 1080p prerequisite is yet to be seen.

In other news, Dish Network is soldiering on with their promise of 150 HD channels by the end of the year, and tomorrow will add 17 must-see HDTV channels including Lifetime Movie Network HD and Starz Edge HD. Read the presser for all the details. [Dish]

ENGLEWOOD, Colo. – July 31, 2008 – DISH Network Corporation (NASDAQ: DISH) today set the bar for the next-generation HD standard by becoming the first in the pay-TV industry to offer high definition programming in 1080p, the highest and best HD resolution available.

This new functionality is part of DISH Network's latest and unprecedented expansion in HD services, which includes the rollout of TurboHD, the industry's first 100 percent, all-HD suite of programming packages. As previously announced, DISH Network will also launch 17 more national HD channels tomorrow, surpassing its goal of reaching 100 national HD channels five months ahead of schedule. DISH Network now plans to nearly double its national HD channel count in less than one year and offer up to 150 national HD channels by the end of 2008, made possible by the recent launch of Echo XI, the most powerful satellite in the company's fleet.

"Over the years, DISH Network has maintained a very competitive HD offering in the marketplace, providing customers with a premium HD product including the best technology, signal and experience – at the best value – that no other pay-TV provider can come close to matching," said Charlie Ergen, Chairman, CEO and President of DISH Network. "Our latest system upgrade coupled with the introduction of TurboHD further strengthens our position as the leader in digital television and high definition television, platforms we look forward to enhancing even more with mobile and portable options."

DISH Network's new HD services are supported by a proprietary "turbo-charged" system upgrade that, starting August 1, is being rolled out to all MPEG-4 HD and HD DVR receivers. The upgrade activates a unique feature of the set-top boxes, improving the current standard of HD delivery used by pay-TV providers such as the ability to output 1080p programming. By early August, all DISH Network customers with MPEG-4 HD and HD DVR receivers will have the only set-top boxes in the nation enabled to display 1080p content, allowing them to maximize the full potential of their 1080p-compatible HDTV sets.

To celebrate this new era in the HD viewing experience, DISH Network is offering subscribers a special deal in August to enjoy the unparalleled picture and sound of 1080p HD programming. Starting August 1, the recent blockbuster "I Am Legend" starring Will Smith will be available in Blu-ray™ disc quality 1080p resolution, only on DISH Network's VOD service, DISH On Demand, at a discounted price. Subscribers may order the movie on DISH Network Channel 501. This marks the first time in history a pay-TV provider offers movies in 1080p, the highest resolution format available for HD video enthusiasts.

Consumers can sign up for the best HD programming and service in the industry with DISH Network's new TurboHD programming packages, the only all-HD packages on the market, starting at $24.99 per month. TurboHD is available in three separate tiers and includes DISH Network's award-winning and industry-leading HD technology, advanced equipment enabled to display 1080p programming, and the most-watched HD channels that may be viewed on any TV – analog, digital or HD.

Current DISH Network customers with MPEG-4 HD and HD DVR receivers are being automatically upgraded and will have their systems "turbo-charged" by early August with all the features and benefits of TurboHD. DISH Network customers looking to add the industry's best HD experience can get a "turbo-charged" HD package for as little as $10 more per month.

The latest national HD channels added to DISH Network's programming line-up are: ActionMax HD (DISH Network Ch. 313), CBS College Sports HD (Ch. 152), Lifetime HD (Ch. 108), Lifetime Movie Network HD (Ch. 109), Planet Green HD (Ch. 194), Encore HD (Ch. 340), HBO 2 HD (Ch. 301), HBO Comedy HD (Ch. 307), HBO Family HD (Ch. 305), HBO Latino HD (Ch. 309), HBO Signature HD (Ch. 302), HBO West HD (Ch. 303), HBO Zone HD (Ch. 308), Starz Comedy HD (Ch. 354), Starz Edge HD (Ch. 352), Starz Kids & Family HD (Ch. 356), Starz West HD (Ch. 351).

For more information about DISH Network's 1080p programming, new HD channels and TurboHD system and packages, visit www.dishnetwork.com or call 1-800-333-DISH (3474).

]]>
Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:00:00 EDT Benny Goldman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031461&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Amazon's Streaming Video on Demand Service Rolls Out Today in Beta, Works With Bravia Video Link ]]> Today Amazon is launching a beta of Amazon Video On Demand, which will stream TV and movies from all the major studios (save for Disney/ABC, which is still in bed with Apple) and take the place of Unbox. The service will instantly stream rentals or download purchases to your PC. But Amazon also has plans to bring it directly to TVs via Sony's Bravia Video Link. Could couch-based Amazon shopping on your TV be far behind?

Amazon sees this as a way to not only bypass set-top boxes and go directly for the TVs (even though Bravia Video Link is currently a $300 add-on) via platforms like Tru2way; the NYTimes also speculates on a move to get the whole Amazon store inside your TV, which makes a lot of sense, even though customers capable of setting up a VoD system directly on their TV are probably just fine with making orders on their laptop—while sitting on the couch. QVC killer! [NYTimes]

]]>
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:53:59 EDT John Mahoney http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026203&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix's Roku Box To Expand Its Horizons, Could Stream Hulu ]]> The already impressive Roku streaming box will expand its services beyond Netflix's VOD adding new "big name" content providers in the future. Roku is taking the coy approach for now, but rumors of a flash-enabled browser to stream Hulu (which now streams at 480p resolution), YouTube and the various individual network sites are both plausible and awesome.

Silicon Valley Insider thinks that Unbox support is unlikely on account of its status as a direct competitor to Netflix streaming, but TiVo supports it so I wouldn't rule it out completely, plus a $99 provider-agnostic box would fill a conspicuously empty gap in the market, and my heart. [Forbes via Silicon Valley Insider]

]]>
Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:14:23 EDT John Herrman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021592&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Vudu Finally Gets Wireless Kit (Works Fine, Expensive by Competitive Measures) ]]> So many products, including the $100 Roku Netflix box, come with wireless, so it was surprising that the $300 Vudu broadband video-on-demand box requires a hard Ethernet connection. Today Vudu announces an $80 Vudu-branded Ethernet-to-802.11g bridge kit built by Asus. I tried it over the weekend, and it worked great.

The dongle near the box powers itself directly from the Vudu's USB jack , meaning no extra power brick. The other end, near your router, does need to plug in, but that's less of a hassle. Best of all, it requires no on-screen configuration and works without any visible degradation when delivering high-bandwidth video. (I can't say the same for the Roku Netflix box, which choked a bit when I tested its built-in Wi-Fi.) Vudu will sell the kit with the video box itself for $350—I think it's a wise addition, though this kit costs as much as the Netflix box in its entirety, and half of the price of an Apple TV. Clearly, a bridge is the most expensive way they could go, and you also have two more things to plug in. [Vudu]

]]>
Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5013315&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Akimbo Execs Hit Eject, Shutter Company For Good ]]> akimboRIP.jpgThe polymorphous life of Akimbo came to an abrupt end this week, as the embattled video-on-demand turned white label video service was shut down for good. The surprising move went down just four months after Akimbo was given an additional $4 million to fund its video services venture. Now the extra cash will go towards former employees' severance packages. Let us reflect on the tumultuous past of Akimbo.

Akimbo hit play in 2002 with a hardware-based VOD set top box that allowed consumers to download television shows from its 200 partners. When the hardware didn't work out, the company branched off into the PC software business with Akimbo for Media Center in the fall of 2005. It struggled until 2006, when the company received a much-needed shot in the arm from Cisco and at&t to the tune of $15 million.

In February 2008, Akimbo shifted, again, to a video service model, but failed to raise a targeted $8 million in funding. High-level executive squabbles earlier in the year also threatened to derail the fledgling company, and this week they apparently came to a boil. More than a dozen employees were terminated on May 22, with a three-person skeleton team staying on to oversee the company's final days. All told, Akimbo received approximately $56 million over the course of its existence for basically nothing. If only Gizmondo would take the hint. [TechCrunch]

]]>
Sun, 25 May 2008 20:00:00 EDT Jack Loftus http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393166&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ PS3 Movie and TV VOD Service Arriving... Sometime ]]> Sony is preparing for the inevitable and will launch a movie and TV video-on-demand service for the PS3 to compete with the glut of other options already available, according to Sony's Peter Dille. He was thin on details, saying the only thing that we'd be getting "very soon" is more details on the service, which he claims will separate itself from the pack that we've already seen. Does that mean low-budget stag films? Exclusively movies/shows that feature Kareem Abdul-Jabaar? Only time will tell. [Kotaku]

]]>
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:35:57 EDT Benny Goldman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380427&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ DirecTV Video-On-Demand to Be Half Satellite, Half Internet Next Quarter ]]> MK-AO618_DIRECT_20080312210005.jpgAccording to the Wall Street Journal, DirecTV is testing a new video-on-demand service that depends on both the customers' satellite dish and their internet connection. To be launched in the second quarter, the service will use the satellite to send a limited number of movies to store in all DirecTV DVRs, for instant on-demand playback, while the rest of the movie catalog will be available not-so-instantly using regular ground-based broadband. Movies like Kevin Costner's Waterworld will be sent on VHS tapes via regular mail from DirecTV's office in Madagascar. [WSJ]

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:10:29 EDT Jesus Diaz http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367497&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ MatrixStream 1080p Instant HD Streamer Now Searching for Content ]]> Gaze into the future with us, foreshadowed by a company called MatrixStream. These wizards teased us with their 1080p HD streaming box 18 months ago, bragging about how it lets you instantly watch 1080p videos over a broadband connection. Fast-forward to today, and now they're announcing the streaming of a grisly-sounding zombie movie from 2006 called Shadow: Dead Riot. Such is the business of walled-garden TV networking. So as the company waits for the content to catch up, their 1080p on-demand hardware and software sounds like it's enormously powerful.

As we mentioned when we first introduced the MatrixStream to you, the catch to obtaining this remarkable streaming H.264 video using MatrixStream's MX-1 set-top box (pictured above) is that you must have a 6Mbps (megabit-per-second) broadband connection. That's what it'll take to watch 1080p videos on the system, and not a megabit less. For 720p HD, you'll need 3Mb, and for regular old 480p DVD-looking stuff, that'll need 1.5Mb per second.

Well, and then there's that other catch, enticing content creators to allow their movies to be moved over the thing. We're not holding our collective breath waiting for that to happen. But it gives you a good look at what might be pretty commonplace two or three years from now.

Reminds us of Vudu, doing almost exactly the same thing with standard def, with HD (albeit 1080i) downloading available now and instant HD reportedly on the way. Even though the $400 Vudu set-top box also has content issues, still, the future looks bright for this kind of tech. [MatrixStream]

]]>
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:05:55 EST Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339526&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Vudu Video Wonderbox Picture Walkthrough and Review: Just Short of Wonderful ]]> Rather than just tell you what's great (and terrible) about the hot new Vudu video-on-demand box, I thought I'd show you, so come on...

2_box_open.jpgThe setup experience is so amazingly simple, it makes TiVo look complex. (Of course, compared to what this simple, broadband-connected video server does, TiVo is complex.
3_some_assembly.jpgSpeaking of TiVo, Vudu's remote is incredible, with five buttons and a clickable jog dial that you can intuit in record time. It's weird how quickly you can use it without looking. By the way, the remote is RF, not IR, so you don't have to point it at the box for it to work.
4_sexy_remote.jpg
5_setup_on_console.jpgOne of Vudu's setbacks is that it is, alas, a set-top box. In a world where game consoles and cable boxes are inevitable, this box, though small, still presents a stacking challenge.
6_look_on_console.jpgBut there is a cool solution: since Vudu's remote is RF, and talks to that little metal antenna you see at the back of the box, you can stash the box anywhere that you'd stash any device with a video processor and a spinning 250GB hard drive. Like a cabinet drawer...
7_setup_in_drawer.jpgHiding it away (with or without my cat Wade) means one less thing you have to look at. While we can thank the RF remote for this, an RF remote does mean one more thing (*cough*PS3 Blu-ray remote*cough*) that you can't replace with a standard universal.
8_cleaner_look.jpgThe home screen, which pops on 20 seconds after you first power up, and is instantly on in most occasions, is a nice example of how organized the Vudu interface is.
9_home_screen.jpgThough it's the home screen that you see when you first get started, there are some tweaking options, should you dig into them. I loved the overscan adjustment—you'd be shocked how helpful it is.
10_tweak_if_want.jpgWhen you scroll through the constantly changing promoted movies on the home screen, you can see which ones are for rent...
11_rent_only.jpg...and which ones you can buy.
12_rent_or_buy.jpgI found that most studio films at this time are rentals, mostly at $3.99. There are plenty of foreign and/or "special interest" movies you can buy, and some of those that you can rent for less, say $1.99. Frankly, the rental aspect of this proprietary box appeals much more than the ownership one.

There are many easy ways to hunt for a movie in Vudu. The genre search is fun, because you can select more than one genre to find interesting combinations like Sci-Fi Documentary...
13_multi_genre_browse.jpg...and yes, Gay & Lesbian Horror. (You know you were curious.)
14_yes_gay_horror.jpgYou can search for a director or actor by name. In this search of Spielberg, you can get a sense that the Vudu catalog is not totally up to snuff. Yes, that is the entire Vudu Spielberg collection.
16_spielberg.jpgSome actors and directors are missing entirely. Being a Back To The Future fan, I had to search for Robert Zemeckis, but typing in his name, or even just ZEME, yielded zilch.
17_no_zemeckis.jpgMy main criticism with the Vudu is that while there are plenty of extra-sweet options like these...
18_decent_browse_choices.jpg...there just aren't enough good hits when you go searching. Here's a clue: in a search for "Coppola," Sofia had two movies, and Francis Ford had 3, none of which were the Godfather.

The good news is, Vudu has designed an excellent interface and a very satisfying alternative platform for delivering movies. I love browsing and watching movies on this thing—the instant gratification is awesome!

As we told you before, the system operates with both a central server and a P2P network, balancing each other to ensure an instant on-demand experience. During my week-long testing over both DSL and cable connections, I never once had more than a tiny video hiccup, and though you can't fast-forward straight away, the video can get to be 20 or 30 minutes ahead of you as you continue watching, so eventually fast-forwarding is an option.

And the picture looks stupendous. Even though the source material is (currently) 480p, that little box upscales that stuff to your desired resolution. In both 720p and 1080p tests, it looked great, perhaps better than a DVD. Here's a look, though even Ben Stiller getting slapped by a monkey doesn't truly do this thing justice:
15_looks_good.jpgBeyond my loudly voiced complaints about content, all I can say is, I wish it were a lot cheaper. Yeah, that's right, Vudu is selling these things for $400. So you can pay more money to buy or rent movies from them.

You could save the money by connecting your PC to your TV and renting from CinemaNow or Movielink. At the moment, both have slightly better catalogs, though that will change. Normally I don't whine about high prices, but I think $400 is a little too much for a box that doesn't come with any free content. There's never been a better case for the razor-and-blades model. With a pricetag like that, Vudu is certainly not going to scare the bejeezus out of Blockbuster Video—not nearly as much as it rightly should.


]]>
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:01:00 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297309&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ When's CableCARD 2.0 Getting Here? ]]> 0407-cablecard-instory.jpgEngadget HD has the story on why CableCARD 2.0—the standard that everyone's waiting for to provide bi-directional high- def cable support like video on demand—isn't here yet. Turns out the standard for bi-directional certification isn't there, and the associations and coalitions of companies can't agree to agree on what's needed for certification.

Come July 1, when the government mandate that says all set-top-boxes need to have CableCARD support goes into effect, cable companies will be rolling out M-Card bi-directional cards that can activate dual-tuner DVRs from just one slot. But still, the problem is on the software side, which means TiVo Series 3s and Vista CableCARD machines won't be doing bi-directional support until a standard is there.

So the actual headline should probably be "There is no CableCARD 2.0...yet."

There is no CableCARD 2.0 [Engadget HD]

]]>
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:30:26 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=269259&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pray You're Not on "The List": Sylar Coming to Your Cell Phone On Demand ]]> NBC Universal is teaming up with MobiTV to bring its TV shows to the small(er) screen: Full-length episodes of "Heroes," "The Office," "Monk," and "Battlestar Galactica" will be available over the air on demand for $1.99 (awesome) but currently only for "a 24-hour viewing period" (not awesome).

Also part of the announced deal are several free, ad-supported on-demand shows, such as "Friday Night Lights," along with content from Bravo, SCI FI, USA, Telemundo and mun2 on five new ad-supported channels available to MobiTV subscribers. But who cares about that when you can get this kind of awesomeness?

While over-the-air on demand has great potential, the 24-hour rental period is a deal-killer, unfortunately. $1.99 makes a great impulse buy if you're stuck on a train or in a doctor's office and missed Sylar impaling ******** on the ceiling the night before, but not if the content magically disappears a day later, especially when you can buy it from iTunes for your iPod to keep for the same price. Or for no price from BitTorrent.

Press Release [MobiTV]

]]>
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:00:58 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=244146&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix Watch Now: Secret Technique for Cutting In Line, Get Streaming Now ]]> Netflix is slowly rolling out its movie streaming feature, but some members of the movie service won't be getting this capability until June. If you're one of the unlucky Netflix users who haven't seen that Watch Now tab appear on the Netflix website yet, now there's a way you can skip waiting in line and have it right away. There's a manual method, which we also skipped, but you might want to try it:

• Log into Netflix.
• Click on "Your Account"
• Look for a small graphic on the right column that says "How can I watch movies on my PC?"
• Click the "Start Now" link, and voila, you have a new tab next to Queue.
But what worked best for us was the following one-click technique:

We just clicked this link, and the Watch Now tab appeared on the Netflix site. Suddenly, we were able to watch streaming movies on demand, included free with our Netflix membership. You get an hour of streaming movie watching per month for each dollar your membership costs.

A couple of quick realizations: the service doesn't work with Firefox, so you have to use Internet Exploder. After downloading Netflix's proprietary playback software, we clicked on the movie Amadeus, and unfortunately it was in a 4x3 aspect ratio with mediocre video quality. So far, eh.

Skip The Wait For Netflix Movie Streaming [uneasysilence]

]]>
Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:29:30 EST Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240649&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Movinflicks Offers Free Current Movies On Demand, Will Be Dead Soon ]]> In the middle of all this big talk about industry titans joining up with BitTorrent, and Amazon and TiVo and Netflix and Wal-Mart all starting to offer movie downloads, isn't it funny when some maverick interloper suddenly offers even better and more current movies than the big boys are offering? Oh yeah, and also with another key diff: they're free.

Not that we would encourage piracy or anything, but Movinflicks.com is offering a heckuva lot of links to movies—many of which you saw win Oscars last night—for free viewing, immediately and in all their full-screen glory. Find out more about our experience with the site:

The movies aren't actually offered in HD as they are purported to be, but we were able to get them to play back perfectly. Of course, now that we've mentioned this obviously soon-to-be-slam-dunked-by-the-MPAA service, it will quickly be overwhelmed with traffic and ultimately brought to its knees.

But the site is just providing links to the pirated movies, right? Well, that's illegal, too. Maybe linking to the linker is illegal, too. Uh-oh. You'll have to find Movinflicks.com on your own. Maybe even glancing at the Movinflicks.com site is illegal. Is that a knock at the door?

]]>
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:50:18 EST Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=239608&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Network Fogies Getting Into YouTube-Like Racket ]]> What do NBC, News Corp., CBS, and Viacom have in common? YouTube. In an effort to dethrone their young Web-based competition, they're joining forces on a new venture/website that would host videos from their respective video vaults. This in turn would draw traffic away from YouTube, and put extra cash in the already fat pockets of TV execs. The problem is....

each company has their own hidden agenda/reason for launching a YouTube competitor. News Corp, for instance, is doing this to sink YouTube before it draws more traffic away from MySpace (which is owned by News Corp.), whereas CBS on the other hand sees this as a way of getting closer to Google, who they're trying to strike a separate deal with on a completely different venture. The YouTube "killer" could be announced as early as this week. The question is—do you care or will YouTube remain being your personal TiVo?

Old Model Versus a Speedster [NYT]

]]>
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:14:38 EST Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222729&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TiVo Blockbuster Partnership Leaked Again ]]> TiVo's store unwittingly leaked their secret relationship with Blockbuster last month, so it's fitting that Blockbuster now returns the favor.

The plan? Get one year of TiVo plus a one year subscription to Blockbuster online for $35.99—cheaper than the two services by themselves. If you cancel the Blockbuster portion of the subscription, your monthly fee drops down to $19.95.

This seems to be just a cross promotion strategy and not some kind of groundbreaking download-movies-to-your-TiVo package. That would have gotten us half-past-nine, if you know what we mean.

TiVo Offer Page

Blockbuster Leaks TiVo Partnership [Zatz not funny]

]]>
Mon, 15 May 2006 17:32:29 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=173905&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TiVo Bundles Blockbuster Online ]]> A TiVo partnership with Blockbuster was uncovered at the TiVo store, where the DVR service was offering a Blockbuster Online subscription (that's the Netflix clone) for $13-$15 extra per month. The deal locks you into the contract with Blockbuster for a year. We'd rather be locked in a cage with a wrestling bear.

It's not surprising that TiVo would go running to Blockbuster for a deal, after its possible Netflix pact that held so much promise now seems dead in the water. We're just wondering what receiving a bunch of DVDs in the mail has to do with TiVo, unless, of course, this portends some movement with some sort of video-on-demand (VOD) deal with Blockbuster. Is it us, or is it dopey that Blockbuster and Netflix are not first movers in the VOD space? Bits instead of atoms, right?

TiVo Two Times Netflix, Promotes Blockbuster [Zatz Not Funny]

]]>
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:19:10 EDT Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=168198&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Video On Demand Gets Spotlight ]]> on demand.jpg

It seems there's no doubt in anyone's mind that video on demand is going to be hot for Internet users. But in Europe, the real problem isn't whether somebody will make money, but who that somebody will be. At a conference in Montpellier, France, telecom operators and media companies got together to haggle their way through business models that will hopefully mean on-demand programming for us sooner rather than later. Sure, there have been a few smaller deals brokered recently, like those between between U.S. TV and film-rights owners like Warner, and European telecom operators such as Fastweb, Deutsche Telekom AG and recently with France Telecom. But programming is limited and neither camp expects big profits from this just yet.

For their part, media companies say they are concerned online video on demand could increase their exposure to piracy.
Internet peer-to-peer software enables millions of web surfers every day to download films for free, even though piracy protection technology has improved. Films rented from online distributors can destroy themselves within a few hours.

Obviously, this draws a parallel with the music industry, which faltered on its business models, letting Apple's iTunes gain a huge lead. I don't think anyone wants to see that happen again.

Firms haggle over video on demand [Reuters]

]]>
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:22:37 EST tgrumet http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=139629&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft On the Defensive Against Video iPod ]]> The Microsoft Inferi are massing on a secret, uncharted island off the coast of Washington, arming themselves for the battle of the century. Bill Gates, disfigured from a recent run-in with Albus Jobs, stands at the head of the long hall, his wand at the ready.

"We will not fail!" he screams. "We will not fall!"

Slowly, the rhythmic thump of a million pasty feet in Tevas fills the hall. The Microsofties are rallying to their Master's cry, screaming for iPod Blood.

"We will use our connections with Hollywood to cut Apple off at the pass. Our spies even now are massing in Beverly Hills to undermine the Ministry of Movie Magic. Jobs must fail."

A throaty, if nasal, howl comes from the Inferi. The Microsoft Code Eaters are on the move.

Microsoft Courts Hollywood Allies [LA Times via Slashdot]

]]>
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:47:22 EDT johnb http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=112972&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Had Best Hurry Up With That Video ]]> ipod_hack_gun2.jpgWord around the iPod-fire is that Apple is planning video downloads and a video iPod in September of this year. They'd best get their ducks in a row right quick. There are a number of other little thingies coming into the horizon, including NetFlix's (NetFlix'?) video-on-demand solution. Obviously, movie studios are really worried about their bottom line because going to the picture show of an evening is such a wonderful experience and they don't want to take that away from us. Case in point: the wife and I went to see Wedding Crashers last night and the kids behind us took four phone calls and maintained a running commentary on their cars and sexual conquests throughout the film.

Regardless, it will be a very interesting time once a true VoD and iPod-branded piece of hardware hit the streets. Very interesting indeed.

Apple to expand video play? [News.com]

See also
The fall of Hollywood? [MarginalRevolution]

]]>
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:05:58 EDT johnb http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=112959&view=rss&microfeed=true