<![CDATA[Gizmodo: virtualization]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: virtualization]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/virtualization http://gizmodo.com/tag/virtualization <![CDATA[VMWare: Your Next Smartphone Might Run Two OSes At Once]]> In an interview with Computerworld, VMWare's head of mobile phone virtualization has indicated that the company wants to move beyond dual-boot systems to allow phones to run a private and work operating system at the same time. They've already demonstrated the potential on a Nokia N800 running Windows CE and Android concurrently; now they're looking into multiple user interface scenarios for current generation smartphones. [Computerworld]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5420663&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Spinning Cubes, Virtual Goodness Permeate This Fine List of Virtual Desktops]]> Having tooled around with Compiz a bit in my previous life as an IT journalist, this list was especially poignant to a bloke like me. This simple bit of Jack Loftus history is why I share this nice little five slot Lifehacker list with you today. Enjoy. Virtually. [Lifehacker]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5358352&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Windows 7's XP Mode to Require 2GB of RAM, True Processor Virtualization]]> We talked about XP Mode—which runs programs that work in XP but not in Vista—in our Windows 7 RC1's hands-on. Now Microsoft is coming up with details about what hardware and licenses this will need.

• A CPU that has true chip-level virtualization from Intel or AMD.
• 2GB of RAM minimum.
• While XP Mode will be a free download for buyers of Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Enterprise, and Windows 7 Ultimate, you will need a licensed copy of Windows XP Service Pack 3.

All seems very straightforward except the virtualization part. According to Microsoft's Scott Woodgate, "Some PCs have [chip-level virtualization] and some don't. It's not as clear as it should be relative to which PCs have support and which don't." Hopefully, they will release a tester program along with Windows 7. [cnet]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5232424&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[VMWare Fusion vs. Parallels Desktop for Mac: Which Is Faster?]]> Ironically, it's one of the biggest decisions you make when you get a Mac: How should I run Windows on it? Parallels or Fusion? An exhaustive battery of benchmarks by MacTech reveals a clear winner.

The short story is that in most cases, Parallels runs a solid 14-20 percent faster than Fusion, except in the rather limited scenario of running Windows XP 32-bit on two virtual processors.

Overall, running 32-bit Windows OSes with a single virtual processor, Parallels is 14 percent faster; with two virtual processors, Parallels is 20 percent faster with Vista, while Fusion is 10 percent faster with XP; and for 64-bit Vista, Parallels is 15 percent speedier. Depending on the task, the numbers vary—like transcoding MP3s can be up to 30 percent faster on Parallels.

MacTech's tests are ridiculously comprehensive, spanning multiple machines with tons of different applications—the whole them took a couple months—so if you want the full, chart-heavy breakdown, head over there: [MacTech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5167056&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[VMWare For Mobile Devices Lets You Run Windows and Android Simultaneously]]> Ok, this is even cooler than we expected: a Nokia N800, loaded with VMWare's MVP hypervisor, is seen here running Windows CE and Android, at the same time. This is a big deal!

What you're watching is, admittedly, virtualization. The MVP hypervisor is a small (20KB) "bare metal" virtual machine which runs beneath the phone's OS(es). What this effectively does is create an identical platform on each and every device it's installed on, allowing OSes to be installed like apps (as in desktop virtualization, they're called "appliances"). Since it's the virtual machine that interfaces with the device's hardware, you can pretty much run any OS without worrying too about driver compatibility, or, as shown above, even run multiple OSes at the same time.

What's especially surprising about this is how well it seems to work. Windows CE, which isn't even technically a mobile OS,(yes, it is, but it's not anything someone could use for a phone) runs well, and Android's 3D spinning globe runs about as quickly as you'd expect it to on the N800's hardware. Though the N800 isn't a phone, the rep in the video makes it very clear that MVP is headed for smartphones, and so it should.

VMWare says they're in talks with manufacturers, who would have to include the hypervisor in their handsets for this to be possible. Problem is, I'm not sure what exactly would motivate a company to pay to license this tech in their handsets. Hardware virtualization, parallel mobile OSes and hypervisors are all a little esoteric for mass marketing, and I'm not sure that "John at Gizmodo totally has a boner for this" will be enough to push HTC over the edge. [ITPro via WindowsForDevices]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5160685&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Parallels 4 Out Now: 50% Faster Than Parallels 3]]> Those running Intel Macs are probably at least familiar with Parallels, the famed virtualization software allowing you to run Windows alongside OSX. Well now the company has just announced their fourth revision of the software, Parallels 4, that promises to run 50% faster than the previous version.

The virtualization engine itself promises to use 15-30% fewer resources as well, while adding the option to run a Leopard Server in a virtual machine and including support for DirectX 9, DirectX Pixel Shader 2.0 and OpenGL 2.0. There are 50 new features and enhancements in all.

Parallels 4 is available now for $80, existing Parallels customers can pick it up for $40 and if you bought Paralells 3 on or after September 1st, you actually qualify for a free upgrade. Two months of lead time on free software upgrades? Not bad! [Parallels via MacWorld]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5083111&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[VMware Pushing Virtual Machines for Smartphones, Will Support Parallel OSes]]> VMware, which consumers know mostly for their Fusion desktop virtualization software, is moving into the mobile space, albeit surreptitiously. The company has announced VMware MVP, a thin layer of software that will interface between handsets' hardware and operating system, allowing for a standardized development platform across any handsets that include it. What does this mean for regular consumers? For now, not much. If the tech finds enough support for hardware vendors, though, the consequences could be major.

For developers, having this VMware abstraction layer is pretty attractive from the start. If the layer is installed in, say, Blackberry, HTC and Motorola smartphones, then the developer will only have to write the software to run on the virtual machine's universal simulated hardware, rather than each phone's different hardware. VMware is promoting this capability as sort of a Java VM on steroids, which — with wide enough deployment and high enough efficiency — could mean an end to platform-specific apps. But that's not the most exciting part.

VMware's European product director told ZDNet that MVP could "make it possible for various mobile operating systems, such as Symbian, varieties of Linux and Windows Mobile, to 'co-exist on the handset as well'." In other words, due to the low-level nature of the solution, a VMware MVP-equipped handset could not just run platform-agnostic programs, it could run entirely different OSes in parallel. Whether anybody will take the time to make that happen remains to be seen, but just the possibility that new hardware could support pretty much any mobile OS is pretty exciting. [ZDNet]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5083023&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[VMware Fusion 2.0 for Macs, Virtualization With 100 New Features]]> To those who'd rather run two OSes at once than dual boot with Boot Camp, VMware has released the 2.0 version of Fusion. It includes over 100 new features, including the option to load Windows programs without a Windows desktop, a Time Machinesque backup utility, and completely mirrored file sharing independent of OS. There's also support for 32-bit and 64-bit OSes, 4-core systems, Bluetooth, DirectX 9.0c and up to 10 displays. Yeah, we pretty much just pasted specs there. But boy, were we excited doing it. [VMware via TGDaily]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5050712&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dealzmodo: Parallels Desktop 3.0 For $39/$49]]> You probably already know that both we and Lifehacker enjoy running Windows on our Macs using Parallels. Well, MacHeist has a deal today where you can pick up a copy for just $49, which includes a copy of MacPilot. That price gets even sweeter ($10 sweeter) if you previously bought a MacHeist bundle. Get yours now if you like good deals. [MacHeist]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020291&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Low-end Windows Vista Editions Now Allowed to be Run Virtualized on Macs]]> Remember that completely arbitrary rule by Microsoft limiting virtualization (which lets you run Windows concurrently with OS X on a Mac) to only the more expensive versions of Vista? It's now gone.

Microsoft's relaxed their ruling, which was previously justified by saying that virtualization wasn't mature enough for consumer adoption, which allowed them to clamp down on only the supposedly more pro or business SKUs of Vista. Combine this with the news of 64-bit Vista support yesterday and this is a good week for people who want to run Windows on Macs. [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=347665&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Windows on Mac Benchmarked: Boot Camp vs. Parallels vs. Fusion]]> The three methods for running Windows on a Mac (Boot Camp, Parallels and Fusion) have been around for a while, but Mactech's numbers seem to be the first we've seen on how the three stack up on Leopard. The results weren't that surprising.

Boot Camp won out for overall speed, where Parallels won for virtualization (running Windows at the same time as Macs) performance. VMWare Fusion, on the other hand, "wins" by keeping your OS X and Window environments separate, which isn't really a feature but more of a lack of a feature—Parallels does a much better and faster job cross-integrating applications and documents. But if you're into keeping up the wall between the two operating systems, there's an option for you. [MacTech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336878&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pano Device Virtualizes Windows With Sexy, Tiny Box Shape]]> In CEO-orgasming news, Pano Logic announced their network-based Pano Device, which, using a main host, virtualizes a copy of Windows XP and Vista without the need for an actual PC. Coming equipped with an Ethernet jack for the network connection, along with three USB ports, a VGA port for the display and audio I/O jacks for dedicated speakers and microphones, the tiny Pano promises to cut Total Cost of Ownership by 70%.

The Pano Device requires a Pano Management Server that hosts copies of XP or Vista and will cost $20 dollars a month per Pano device attached to the network. The server and device will be available in September and will bring a tear of joy to a business owner's eye. [Panologic via Electronista]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293988&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Try the $100 OLPC Operating System at Home]]> Thanks to the magic of VMWare and Parallels (which let you run other operating systems on top of your own), you can try the OLPC operating system without actually having to be a child in a Third World country. All you have to do is download a pre-configured image, change some settings, and you're set. Possible uses (besides as a prop when you play Angelina Jolie and the Adopted Child) are developing OLPC-specific software and web apps for the upcoming market. [UneasilySilence]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281475&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Exclusive: More Details on Parallels Desktop 3.0]]> We had a chat with the Parallels guys earlier today, and got some new information that should be very interesting to people who are even the slightest bit interested in running Windows on your Mac.

We went over some of the stuff we covered yesterday, but there's lots of new stuff and even one major feature we didn't mention: Snapshots.

First off, the three major features are 3D graphics support, SmartSelect, and Snapshots.

3D graphics support is the shiniest feature everyone's talking about now. Yes, it will support 3D games like Quake and Half Life, but no, right now it doesn't support Vista Aero—that's coming in a later release.

Parallels couldn't give me an exact number when I asked for how much of a performance gap there'd be between running a game in Parallels and running it in native Boot Camp, but they did say that it's very close to native and you wouldn't really notice any gameplay problems. That, of course, depends on the game, but Half Life 2 ran fine on his machine.

One thing to note is that not all games will be supported by default. They'll have a list of games they support, and the list will be updated whenever there's a new build available. Hopefully your game will be supported at launch, but Parallels has a reputation for releasing frequent, and top-notch, updates.

The second major feature is SmartSelect, which allows you to set a preference for opening any file in any application, no matter which OS it's in. Example: You can set text files to open up in Windows Notepad, so even if you double-click it in OS X, it'll still pop open Notepad. Think of it as an extension of Coherence, which lets you run Windows apps in its own window on OS X.

On a side note, if you're in Windows and you look in your start menu, you'll be able to see all of the OS X apps listed under a Parallels folder, and have a similar option for opening Windows apps in OS X. Neato.

The third major feature is Snapshots, which lets you take a snapshot of your virtual machine so you can revert to it if something's wrong. Do this before you install apps or make any major changes, and you'll have something to fall back on in case anything goes wrong.

It's super useful for software testers or people who make modifications to their OS, and only takes up minimal room on your hard drive per snapshot.

All in all, the guys tell us that besides the new features, everything else is more robust than even version 2.5, which just came out recently. With their track record, we believe them.

Product Page [Parallels]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265326&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Parallels 3.0 Supports 3D Windows Gaming, SmartSelect]]> One of the main reasons why Mac users still use Boot Camp to run Windows Natively instead using virtualization software like Parallels is its lack of 3D gaming (OpenGL and DirectX) support. In Parallels Desktop version 3.0, now in final candidate development, you can finally use 3D gaming without rebooting.

The other major feature is "SmartSelect," which allows users to open a file in either a OS X or Windows program directly from OS X. You won't have to fire up the Windows program first and open it the long way. New versions cost $79 and upgrade versions are $39 if you buy before June 6.

Product Page [Parallels via MacWorld]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264979&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Parallels Gets Release Candidate 2, New Features]]> parallelshack.pngOur favorite Windows on Mac virtualization software just got a second Release Candidate, adding loads of pretty awesome features make your Windows actually run like Windows.

Among them are full USB 2.0 support, which means you can use your Zune on your Mac with abandon, iSight support, so you can video-chat it up in XP, improved memory usage, sharing a Boot Camp partition, and better Coherence support.

That last part means you can actually add Windows apps to your dock, and if Parallels isn't running when you launch the app, it'll start up automagically for you.

Product Page [Parallels]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=234018&view=rss&microfeed=true