When you take things out of context, you get all sorts of craziness. The paragraphs actually read:
"In recent years, I, like many other reviewers, have argued that Apple's Mac OS X operating system is much better than Windows. That's no longer true. I still give the Mac OS a slight edge because it has a much easier and cheaper upgrade path; more built-in software programs; and far less vulnerability to viruses and other malicious software, which are overwhelmingly built to run on Windows.
Now, however, it's much more of a toss-up between the two rivals. Windows 7 beats the Mac OS in some areas, such as better previews and navigation right from the taskbar, easier organization of open windows on the desktop and touch-screen capabilities. So Apple will have to scramble now that the gift of a flawed Vista has been replaced with a reliable, elegant version of Windows."
Unless you're a fanboy afraid at every moment that someone is going to say something good about Windows, the context of the quote doesn't indicate anything different from the quote presented in the post.
@Thermopyle: But those three points behind WHY OS X is still better than windows are huge reasons as to why its users prefer OS X. It's *still* a pretty big deal.
@Shawn Pero: It's called common-sense, spam filtering and antivirus software. I run Avira antivirus. It's free and has a tiny footprint.
I also don't open every little email that comes to me like a moron, nor do I install every little crappy app that I run across on the internet.
My car is vulnerable to being irreparably damaged in high-speed collisions. Therefore, I drive with a little bit of caution and common-sense instead of randomly hurtling down the street at 90 mph.
Calling Windows completely vulnerable to attack by malware and viruses is like saying the United States is completely vulnerable to attack from everywhere because it borders the Atlantic and the Pacific.
This is great. Part of why OS X was good, was because they had to compete hard from marketshare. Competition is good for everyone. Mac and PC users a like.
Now if only my brothers brand new wireless card would freaking work in Win7. Seriously,it is a current model on the shelves at Best Buy (NetGear) and others seem to have made it work.
I can't wait to get a release version to upgrade my media center with. The only reason it hasn't been done already is I didn't want to risk loosing CC support and my guide settings only to have to do it again on release.
Looks like Microsoft's super secret surrogate project has made its way out of the labs.
Don't worry Walt, we'll find you wherever you are, free you, and get you back in that cubicle surrounded by your beloved cappuccinos, bran muffins, and pre release products STAT.
@Hello Mister Walrus:
Just like the biggest beer company in the world producing the best beer, or the biggest car company in the world producing the best car, yeah, just like that.
Actually, this quote is somewhat taken out of context and he doesn't say that Windows 7 is the best OS. The rest of the paragraph reads as follows: "I still give the Mac OS a slight edge because it has a much easier and cheaper upgrade path; more built-in software programs; and far less vulnerability to viruses and other malicious software, which are overwhelmingly built to run on Windows." So, the Mac OS is still better, just not "much better."
@TunaCan: What I'm saying is just that the company with the most resources has the best chance of producing the best product. Microsoft is not like a beer or car company as software production has great economies of scale. GM must balance output with the cost of producing cars. MS can allocate most of its resources to development and support, since DVD production is a trivial expense.
This alone does not guarantee that MS will produce better products than its competitors. However, if someone with zero preconceptions about software companies was asked to choose which would likely produce the best product today, MS would be the rational answer.
Good news for all. Apple will now have to try even harder to get back in the lead. Competition is a win for all users/consumers both technologically and financially.
@asten77: Lead in this case meant being judged as superior over major competitors. I would gladly take 2% of the market. Apple seems to be doing quite well with its 2%.
@kernel panic: its a valid issue. I have no issues upgrading from 10.2 - 10.3 to 10.5 on the mac. apple gets a pass on 10.6 due to it being only for intels and thus for a different chipset than the previous versions,
Microsoft doesn't get that pass. Its the same hardware, and thus its a coding decision preventing Microsoft from migrating users and settings to Win 7 from XP
@Jim Topoleski: That's a facetious argument. Upgrading XP to 7 is not like upgrading 10.2-10.5. They are completely different kernels using different install procedures.
@Jim Topoleski: Why does Apple get a pass on 10.6? Just because you want to make an argument? Get real. Besides, 10.2 came out in 2002. Try upgrading from 10.1 to 10.6
@Jim Topoleski: The upgrade path you are describing is the equivalent of going from XP to XP SP1...and then to XP SP3.
I will grant that apple seems to do a better job of migrating settings between OS renditions, but i just don't consider a clean install a "difficult" upgrade path, especially considering the generational gap between operating systems. Besides, clean installs are just good housekeeping. You shouldn't wait until a new OS to do it.
I subscribe to the PRINT edition. Years ago, you could go online as a PRINT subscriber and access their articles. Now the two(print and online) are separate. That pissed me off. I still prefer the PRINT edition.
WSJ is the best paper around, NY Times is utter trash and is completely biased.
10/08/09
Cupertino - we have a problem.
10/08/09
10/08/09
"In recent years, I, like many other reviewers, have argued that Apple's Mac OS X operating system is much better than Windows. That's no longer true. I still give the Mac OS a slight edge because it has a much easier and cheaper upgrade path; more built-in software programs; and far less vulnerability to viruses and other malicious software, which are overwhelmingly built to run on Windows.
Now, however, it's much more of a toss-up between the two rivals. Windows 7 beats the Mac OS in some areas, such as better previews and navigation right from the taskbar, easier organization of open windows on the desktop and touch-screen capabilities. So Apple will have to scramble now that the gift of a flawed Vista has been replaced with a reliable, elegant version of Windows."
10/08/09
Unless you're a fanboy afraid at every moment that someone is going to say something good about Windows, the context of the quote doesn't indicate anything different from the quote presented in the post.
10/08/09
10/08/09
I also don't open every little email that comes to me like a moron, nor do I install every little crappy app that I run across on the internet.
My car is vulnerable to being irreparably damaged in high-speed collisions. Therefore, I drive with a little bit of caution and common-sense instead of randomly hurtling down the street at 90 mph.
Calling Windows completely vulnerable to attack by malware and viruses is like saying the United States is completely vulnerable to attack from everywhere because it borders the Atlantic and the Pacific.
Common sense and defense mechanisms.
10/08/09
10/08/09
Yep, Win7 has driver issues.
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
Don't worry Walt, we'll find you wherever you are, free you, and get you back in that cubicle surrounded by your beloved cappuccinos, bran muffins, and pre release products STAT.
10/08/09
10/08/09
Just like the biggest beer company in the world producing the best beer, or the biggest car company in the world producing the best car, yeah, just like that.
10/08/09
Actually, this quote is somewhat taken out of context and he doesn't say that Windows 7 is the best OS. The rest of the paragraph reads as follows: "I still give the Mac OS a slight edge because it has a much easier and cheaper upgrade path; more built-in software programs; and far less vulnerability to viruses and other malicious software, which are overwhelmingly built to run on Windows." So, the Mac OS is still better, just not "much better."
10/08/09
This alone does not guarantee that MS will produce better products than its competitors. However, if someone with zero preconceptions about software companies was asked to choose which would likely produce the best product today, MS would be the rational answer.
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
For anyone interested in the article this dude's (incorrectly) referencing: [gizmodo.com]
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
Microsoft doesn't get that pass. Its the same hardware, and thus its a coding decision preventing Microsoft from migrating users and settings to Win 7 from XP
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
I will grant that apple seems to do a better job of migrating settings between OS renditions, but i just don't consider a clean install a "difficult" upgrade path, especially considering the generational gap between operating systems. Besides, clean installs are just good housekeeping. You shouldn't wait until a new OS to do it.
10/08/09
Repent Walter,repent!
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
@Mozoltov, motherfucker: No. But this is close to desktop size, and shows what you will have to deal with if you DON'T repent.
09/15/09
WSJ is the best paper around, NY Times is utter trash and is completely biased.