<![CDATA[Gizmodo: Walt]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: Walt]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/walt http://gizmodo.com/tag/walt <![CDATA[ Walt Mossberg Pans Buggy MobileMe in Review ]]> Mossberg has rolled out an in-depth review of MobileMe backed by a week of testing in today's WSJ, and if you've been following our coverage it won't come as too big of a surprise that he's not a fan. But his problems with the service go well beyond the launch hiccups you've read about. So what's got Mossberg so riled up that he's thrown down his big badhammer on MobileMe?

To summarize his grievances:

His major gripe with MobileMe is that unlike most Apple products he's reviewed, it doesn't "just work." He cites changes made on computers taking "15 minutes, at best" to sync out to the web interface and iPhones, which is a big no-no for a service touting instant syncing across all of your devices. Other results from his test are equally disappointing:

  • Web interface sluggish, and needs to be hard-refreshed to get changes to show up.
  • Web-based storage is full of bugs when trying to connect with Windows machines
  • Tons of incompatibilities bringing Mac contact groups and calendars into Outlook—things showing up as separate address books and calendars rather than groups or merging into the main calendar.
  • Synched contacts loading slowly on iPhone, occasionally loading with no phone numbers and dropping custom ringtones (to play the Rocky theme when Pogue calls?)

In short, MobileMe is still full of substantial bugs and isn't close to being ready for prime time, if you haven't been able to tell already. Coming from Mossberg, though, means Apple needs to get serious about fixing this thing. So f you're on the fence of whether to drop the $100 on a subscription, it's probably a good idea to wait a bit.

Here's the report straight from Walt's iSight.

[AllThingsD]

]]>
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:00:28 EDT John Mahoney http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028572&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gizmodo's iPhone 3G Review Matrix ]]> How do you read three lengthy reviews at the same time, really really fast? You jump to our review matrix of the iPhone 3G, first judged exclusively by the Three Amigos of Appledom: Ed Baig of USA Today, Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal and David Pogue of the New York Times.

If you need more gritty and less nitty, check out Chen's rundown of the reviews. Or, if you have some spare time, read the Three Amigos' own unexpurgated scribblings. [USA Today, WSJ/AllThingsD, NYT]

]]>
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:00:00 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023195&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ iPhone 3G Reviews Are In ]]> The first iPhone 3G reviews have just hit, from Walt Mossberg of the WSJ and All Things D, Ed Baig from USA Today and David Pogue from the NYTimes. No one goes deep into the app store but here's what they think:

Walt Mossberg of the WSJ has been testing it "for a couple of weeks" and sees that surfing on the faster 3G is between three and five times the speed of the original iPhone. However, Moss found that browsing on the 3G network drained his battery much faster than browsing on the original. Externally, he says the speaker was "much louder" (YES!) for both music and speakerphone, but otherwise pretty much the same as the original. One bug/feature he ran into was that you can only sync your calendar and contacts with either Exchange or your personal accounts, not both.

In Mossberg's own battery tests, he got 4 hours and 27 minutes (short of 5 hours) of talk time, which is three hours less than his test on the original iPhone. Using 3G, he got 5 hours and 49 minutes, which is slightly better than Apple's own claim. He couldn't test any apps on his iPhone 3G, but did on his old iPhone—they worked pretty much as advertised. He concludes with pretty much what we've all known: it's slightly more expensive on AT&T due to the higher price plan, but satisfies people who really need that 3G speed. What's weird is that Mossberg didn't test the GPS functionality at all, so we're left wondering how that is. [All Things D]

Ed Baig of USA Today also tested the iPhone 3G and claims both that it was worth the wait, but still not perfect. His complaints of the first one—no video capture, no Bluetooth stereo and no voice dialing—are still there. Also, AT&T's 3G coverage was nonexistent in his New Jersey home, which kinda negates the whole "iPhone 3G" thing. He notes that the new plastic backing helps reception, and the new flush headphone jack is "a welcome development." Unlike Mossberg, Baig does have something to note on the GPS. He says he was quite impressed by its accuracy when searching for pizza places while driving, and hopes that there will be a third-party add-on for turn-by-turn live directions.

Baig also says that the speaker is improved, but notes strangely that you can't directly charge the new iPhone 3G in some old accessories, such as a Bose SoundDock or a Belkin car kit. There's actually an adapter coming that will enable charging on those. Weird. He finishes up with his wishes for the next generation: Flash, Java and WMV support, removable battery and an expandable memory slot. All in all, a pretty positive review. [USA Today]

David Pogue of the NYT says that the audio quality is much improved, and notes that both incoming and outgoing sound is better than before. "In fact, few cellphones sound this good." The curved back makes the phone feel better in your hand, which is a definite plus. However, he says, the missing "standard cellphone features" from the first generation are also missing from this one. He hopes that the third-party Apps from the iPhone App Store will help fill in the gaps, but some of the ones we've seen—finding parking spots, free phone calls at Wi-Fi hotspots, random restaurant recommender, expense tracker, Etch-a-Sketch and tip calculator—don't exactly make up for the missing MMS, video recording and cut and paste features. Pogue also noticed the GPS does not support turn-by-turn navigation.

Pogue doesn't have much else in the way of benchmarks or impressions, but comes off seeming like he really likes the phone because of the iPhone 2.0 software; something old iPhone owners will be able to get for free. [NYT]

Notes: We have to say that Mossberg's review was the best in terms of completeness (save for the GPS omission). Normally, Newsweek would have a review up for the iPhone along with these three guys, but both they and Wired don't have an early review. This, we think, is because Steven Levy (the old Newsweek guy) at Wired, and Fake Steve Jobs (who hasn't quite started at Newsweek) didn't get the nod from Apple. We had our own hands on with the phone back at WWDC, which covers a lot of the exterior hardware elements as well as some of the software details.

]]>
Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:13:06 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023168&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walt Mossberg Reviews GoGo In-Flight Wi-Fi (Verdict: Fast, But Not Fast Enough) ]]> Walt just tested GoGo, the in-flight Wi-Fi service, on a bunch of laptops and smartphones during a flight from San Francisco to Denver. The service distributes, via Wi-Fi, a high speed cellphone data signal pointed at airplanes, which Mossy rated at around 600kbps down and 250kbps up. This was quick enough for Walt to browse the web, send emails with iPhone rumor attachments, and talk on IM to his ladies, but it couldn't keep up with streaming video on Xtube Hulu. Also, VoIP is blocked, and cell calls aren't possible either. Still, Mossy thought it did well enough for someone who can't stay off the grid for a few hours. GoGo costs $10 for flights under three hours, and $13 for longer ones. It'll begin rolling out in the next few weeks on American Airlines, with Virgin soon to follow. [AllThingsD]

]]>
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:18:07 EDT Benny Goldman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017920&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ WaltMossbergSays is the Best Tech Pundit Site EVER ]]> It's no secret Walt Mossberg is a freakin' super-pundit in the tech world (it's rumored he once liveblogged for 14 hours straight...while standing). And if you need some words from the man himself, all you have to do is head over to waltmossbergsays.com, jot down your statement/prediction/infallibility, and BOOM! — Walt speaks. Not only that, but people never question what Mossberg says, because he basically knows everything. I mean, did you see the D6 Conference? [WaltMossbergSays] (Thanks, Grant)

]]>
Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:35:08 EDT Adrian Covert http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014152&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple to Sell Movies on DVD Release Day, Confirmed ]]> It's confirmed. Apple will release all new movies from 20th Century Fox, The Walt Disney Studios, Warner Bros., Paramount Pictures, Universal Studios Home Entertainment, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Lionsgate, Image Entertainment and First Look Studios on the same day as their DVD release, for $14.99. Full press release after the jump.

Purchase New Movies on iTunes Same Day as DVD Release CUPERTINO, Calif., May 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Apple(R) today announced that new movie releases from major film studios and premier independent studios are available for purchase on the iTunes(R) Store ( http://www.itunes.com ) on the same day as their DVD release. New releases and catalog titles will be available from 20th Century Fox, The Walt Disney Studios, Warner Bros., Paramount Pictures, Universal Studios Home Entertainment, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Lionsgate, Image Entertainment and First Look Studios. Movies purchased from iTunes can be viewed on an iPod(R) with video, iPhone(TM), Mac(R) or PC or on a widescreen TV with Apple TV(R), with new releases priced at $14.99 and most catalog titles at $9.99. "We're thrilled to bring iTunes Store customers new films for purchase day-and-date with the DVD release," said Eddy Cue, Apple's vice president of iTunes. "We think movie fans will love being able to buy their favorites from major and independent studios." New releases available for purchase on the iTunes Store this week, concurrent with their DVD release, include "American Gangster" and "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly." Other popular titles now available for purchase include "Juno," "Cloverfield," "I Am Legend," "There Will Be Blood," "Alvin and the Chipmunks" and "Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story." The iTunes Store is the world's most popular online music, TV and movie store with a catalog of over six million songs, 600 TV shows and over 1,500 films including 200 in stunning high definition video. With Apple's legendary ease of use, pioneering features such as new iTunes Movie Rentals, integrated podcasting support, iMix playlist sharing, the ability to turn previously purchased tracks into complete albums at a reduced price, and seamless integration with iPod and iPhone, the iTunes Store is the best way for Mac and PC users to legally discover, purchase and download music and video online. Pricing & Availability Movie purchases and rentals from the iTunes Store for Mac or Windows require iTunes 7.6.2, available as a free download immediately from http://www.itunes.com. iTunes movie purchases and rentals require a valid credit card with a billing address in the country of purchase. iTunes Movies are available in the US only and are $9.99 (US) for library title purchases and $14.99 (US) for new release purchases and $2.99 (US) for library title rentals and $3.99 (US) for new release rentals, and high definition rental versions are priced just one dollar more with library title rentals at $3.99 (US) and new release rentals at $4.99 (US). Short films are available to rent for 99 cents (US). Movies can be previewed, purchased and watched on iPod classic, iPod nano with video, iPod touch, iPhone and on a widescreen TV with Apple TV.
]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 08:44:46 EDT Jesus Diaz http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386026&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mossberg Takes Back 3G iPhone in 60 Days Quote ]]> The Walt Mossberg clip that made the rounds this weekend, proclaiming the 3G iPhone a mere 53 days away? He just backpedaled on it, swearing he has no better idea than we do. And if he did, he'd give himself scoop: "If I knew when this date was, why would I announce it in the middle of a sentence at the Finnish embassy, rather than report it in the Wall Street Journal?" Guess that chat with Steve straightened everything out, though is it really something he can take back? [Silicon Alley Insider]

]]>
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:42:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377397&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walt Says 3G iPhone Coming in 60 Days ]]> Walt Mossberg has confirmed what AT&T Mobility CEO Ralph de la Vega already hinted at CTIA: the iPhone will be 3G-capable "in 60 days." Mossberg said it 6:53 into this Beet.tv feature. Knowing that it's going to be one year after release, what De la Vega said, and the fact that Walt gets his mitts on the goods way before anyone else, it's only logical to think he is right. We will discover it around June 4.

[9to5mac—thanks Ted]

]]>
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:49:08 EDT Haroon Malik http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376519&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Officially Official: Windows Vista SP1 Is Available... NOW ]]> Windows_Vista_Take_2.jpgWindows' much demanded Vista Service Pack 1 is finally free for you to download from Windows Update or Microsoft Download Center. Microsoft says SP1 will bring "improvements that address many key pieces of customer feedback, especially in the areas of performance and reliability." Gaming and networking are two particular areas of improvement, though experienced opinionators like our beloved Mossberg think it may well just be turd polish (not his words, to be sure). Want more info? Keep your eyes on this blog.

]]>
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:44:14 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369240&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Our MacBook Air Review Matrix ]]>
The so-called "four horsemen" of Apple product reviews have weighed in on the near weightless MacBook Air. You may have seen our post on it last night. You may have even caught one or two of the reviews. But only now can you sit back and enjoy the best quotes from all four reviews in a handy easy-to-read review matrix from your friends at Gizmodo.

MacBook_Air_Review_Matrix.jpgWhile most of the additional material covered in the reviews is basically factual stuff that you've already been agonizing over for a week or more, they're all decent reads if you have the time.

• Pogue's preview-review from 1/17 New York Times

• Ed Baig's story in USA Today

• Steven Levy's piece from Newsweek's website

• Walt Mossberg's review from Wall Street Journal and allthingd.com

Of course, if you don't have the time for those, pop over to Chen's superfast big-shot review summary and then, well, get about your business. [All About MacBook Air]

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:00:06 EST Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348361&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ First MacBook Air Reviews Trickle In ]]> Three MacBook Air reviews are in from USA Today, Newsweek and the WSJ. The first two reviews are both fairly positive, with caveats, but the WSJ's reads slightly less so. Lets begin.

USA Today: USA Today's Ed Baig summarizes with this verdict: "Given the compromises, I don't expect anyone to use Air as their only computer. But it is a yummy machine for people who spend a lot of time traveling." Going more in depth, he lauds the Air's thinness, and revels at the little things like the magnetic latch and the backlit LED display. The worst part? He got more than an hour less than Apple's rated battery life.

Baig also notes that this is the weakest Core 2 Duo in the entire Mac lineup, which means you won't be using this for video editing. He knocks points off for the sacrifices, such as the internal optical drive, the scant 80GB hard disk space, the one USB port, lack of FireWire, and the average battery life. Apple rated it at 5 hours, but he only got three hours and 40 minutes just surfing the web, using Remote Disc and writing. It only lasted two hours and 40 minutes when watching a movie. Verdict: Not for everyone (mostly travelers), and definitely not a main computer. [USA Today]

Newsweek: Steven Levy at Newsweek compares the Macbook Air's thinness to ritualistic circumcision, noting that they sliced off just enough to make it meaty, yet super thin. Thin enough for him to spend a good third of his review saying how thin it is, and how it's so great on a lap, on a Starbucks' table, on a conference table, and on an airplane seatback tray. He then decries the obvious lack of features we've been talking about since we heard about the Air: lack of user-replaceable battery, the one USB port, no optical drive, blah blah blah.

It essentially reads like Levy reviewed off the spec sheet, and doesn't have many tales of his first-hand experience with such topics as how snappy the sluggish processor is or how convenient (or inconvenient) using the Remote Disc is (he does note that you have to lower your Firewall to its lowest setting to allow easier configuration). Verdict: Not much of one, but what he does have agrees with Baig: it's thin and even though Apple's removed much of its innards, "the things that Apple left on were the ingredients for a quality computer." Also, he spends much of the review talking in a roundabout way about penises, so it's worth a read just for that. [Newsweek]

Wall Street Journal: Mossberg from the big J also loves the svelteness, owning up to his own Contact moment by saying that "it's impossible to convey in words just how pleasing and surprising this computer feels in the hand." Of course, he hates the non-removable battery, the 1 USB port, the fact that you can't put a bigger hard drive in there and the lack of an optical drive.

In his own tests, he says the machine was "speedy" and the keyboard and screen were a "pleasure to use". His own battery tests gave him three hours and 24 minutes with Wi-Fi on and playing music nonstop. He theorizes that you could possibly get 4 hours and 30 minutes without playing music and just working normally, bug Baig's own test disproves that. Verdict: Great if you love thinness or a full-sized screen and keyboard on a "subnotebook", but he "can't recommend it for all." [AllThingsD]

]]>
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:10:46 EST Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348306&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Where Is David Pogue's MacBook Air Review? ]]> Pogue_w_Flowers.jpgWednesday night around this time, we like to check in with our favorite columnists. Tonight we expected MacBook Air reviews from Walt Mossberg at WSJ, Ed Baig at USA Today, Steven Levy at Newsweek and of course, David Pogue at the venerable New York Times. Only, when I refreshed my browser at 9pm, Pogue's Jan. 24 State of the Art column turned out to cover Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac and MacSpeech Dictate, rather than the far sexier (and more controversial) MacBook Air. UPDATE: Pogue scoops the other A-Team members by reviewing the Macbook Air on the Macworld show floor. His response in the comments. [First MacBook Air Reviews]

]]>
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:08:21 EST Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348310&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Miracles: Mossberg Says Dell XPS One Is Better Machine than an iMac ]]> Today, December 27 at 1:01AM EDT, The Supreme Pope of Tech Walter Mossberg has declared the Dell XPS One a better machine than the iMac. And yes, that sound you thought you dreamt was Steve Jobs screaming and Hell freezing over. The Dell XPS One comes "sightly ahead" of the iMac because of its design and hardware features, like the audio video controls or the built-in memory card readers:

It's the first Windows computer that I would put in the same class or even sightly ahead in terms of its hardware design

And if you think this is one of our Onionmodos, you can see The Mighty and Goateetastic Mossberg telling you all about it face to face. We had to watch the video twice:

His reasons are good, although I'm not so keen on the design of the Dell myself, which I find plain and vulgar. He's also right when he brings up two issues to declare that, overall, the Apple iMac still wins. First, he argues that Mac OS X Leopard is a faster and better operating system than Vista (most of us in the Giz agree on that one.) Then, he adds that the Dell is a more expensive machine than the iMac, which admits no denial: even while you add the same memory and wireless keyboard and mouse to the iMac price, the Dell XPS One is $100 more expensive than the Apple machines.

His overall verdict: best machine a Windows user can buy.

Next in the path to Apocalypse: David Pogue ditches his iPhone for a Windows Mobile Samsung, Brian Lam sells his MacBook and buys a Sony and random angel plays the fourth trumpet. [All Things D]

]]>
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:44:24 EST Jesus Diaz http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337968&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Our Leopard Review Matrix ]]> Don't have time to read over the full reviews from NYT's David Pogue, USA Today's Ed Baig and WSJ's Walt Mossberg? Read our handy review matrix instead, where we break out everything that wasn't merely feature description in an easy-to-compare chart. You can thank us later!

Leopard_Review_Matrix.jpgPogue's NYT review
Ed Baig's USA Today review
Mossy's WSJ review

]]>
Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:52:34 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=314940&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mossberg Keeps On Dreaming of a Phone Revolution ]]> mossbewg.jpgMossy's column today is a remix of his Wireless Telcos as Soviet ministries joke, told first in a June 2005 column. He complains about phone companies locking handsets to carriers, and making them lame little pocket convenience stores for ringtones, and so on (my words). The timepeg is Apple's new promise of a software development kit for the iPhone, perhaps the device that could best benefit from such an open arrangement. Yes, I am glad he's continuing the salvo against the phone companies. But there is a but.

I am glad he credits Apple with trying to do the right thing as far as the SDK and openness go. I just wish he was a little more skeptical of Apple, given that they now share revenues for monthly charges and I'd assume, ringtones and maybe future apps. My point is that I hope that Mossberg has a plan of action for journalists and consumers to fight this one and enacting some change, rather than just a theoretical bitch much like the 2005 column and the great craplet article from last year. Maybe journalists covering the topic should base their ratings on all phones in part by checking how tarted up a handset is by a carrier, and regular joes can buy unlocked handsets. But I'm unsure of what else can be done. So, Walt, lead the charge and we'll follow. What can we do to fight the machine? [AllThingsD]

]]>
Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:51:38 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313592&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walt Disney Calls BS on "Baby Einstein Melts Your Baby's Mind" Study ]]> einsteindunce.jpgReporting scientific research in the mainstream media is generally difficult—results have to summarized and simplified for non-scientist folk, and more often than not, wind up sensationalized to make for better headlines. Walt Disney's claiming that's exactly what happened with the widely reported (and mocked) results of the Baby Einstein study. I'm not a scientist, so I'll leave it to their respective lawyers to decide who's right and who's wrong. Press release after the jump.

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY DEMANDS RETRACTION FROM UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOR MISLEADING PRESS RELEASE

University Statement Blatantly Misrepresents Research Findings About Baby Einstein

Burbank, Calif., August 13, 2007 - The Walt Disney Company has demanded the immediate retraction of an inflammatory and misleading University of Washington press release that misrepresented research data about Baby Einstein. While the press release asserted that viewing baby DVDs, such as Baby Einstein, would have a noticeably detrimental effect on language development, the study itself concluded by stating "The analysis presented here is not a direct test of the developmental impact of viewing baby DVDs/videos. We did not test through experimental manipulation whether viewing baby DVDs/videos has a positive or negative impact on vocabulary acquisition."

In a letter to University President Mark Emmert, Bob Iger, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Walt Disney Company called the press release "deliberately misleading, irresponsible and derogatory" because it "blatantly misrepresented what the study was about, distorted the actual findings and conclusions, and ignored the study's own explicit acknowledgment of its limitations and shortcomings."

"We welcome well conceived and well executed research of all kinds, particularly involving media products and children," Iger noted. "However, we question the credibility of a study that says watching American Idol is better for infants than no television at all."

Iger also pointed out several shortcomings of the study. For example, while the study purports to be based on a survey of 1,008 parents of children aged 2 to 24 months, after a closer examination, its critical conclusions focus on the impact of baby videos on infants 8 to 16 months, which is a much smaller sample of only 384 children. Of this group, 44 percent watched no television of any kind, leaving a total of 215 infants with some television viewing—but with no indication whatsoever as to how many of this smaller number watch any baby videos, much less Baby Einstein videos specifically, at all. The study was also based on telephone surveys, not active observation.

]]>
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:46:29 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289177&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ VMWare Fusion Review by Mossberg ]]> Walt Mossberg appears to be scooping again. This time, it's a review of VMWare's Fusion (Available this Monday, August 6th). The software, like Parallels, allows PC programs to run from within OS X. Mossberg compares them, simply:

Parallels has more features than Fusion...But I found Fusion puts less strain on the computer overall.
Jacqui at Ars notes that Parallels isn't taking this competitor lying down. They just released a new beta that supports Mac Expose window swooshing of Windows programs. [VMWare via AllThingsD] ]]>
Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:14:19 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=285551&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ $400 Ooma Gives You Free VOIP and Landline Calls for Life ]]> Companies such as Vonage had better look to their laurels, as new kid on the block Ooma is looking to steal their thunder with a product that offers VOIP calls—but with a twist. From September, you will be able to get your hands on the Ooma, a hub that combines VOIP with regular landlines. But you have to shell out a lot of dosh first...

And that's $400—or $399, to be exact. This is what happens. You buy your Ooma Hub and connect it. It gives you free internet calls, but also works with your existing landline. If you have to dial 911 it does so on your landline (VOIP apparently can have problems connecting to the emergency number). International calls are automatically routed through the internet—which means they are gratis.

There are other benefits as well: Ooma gives you a virtual second line, meaning that if another call comes in while you are already on the phone, your butler/gimp/special friend/warthog can answer it from another extension. It comes with a built-in answering machine, and you can check your messages and call logs online. So, kind of like Skype, but not Skype.

WSJ's Mossberg has just had a go on one and gave it the Walt thumbs-up, with just one niggle: He had a bit of trouble with incoming calls until he connected to another jack.

The Ooma comes out in September but until then they're making it rather exclusive—rather like the launch of Gmail. Over the summer, 1500 lucky people will be getting freebies, as well as three Ooma tokens to give out to their friends so that they can pick up a hub for free. Lucky them. [Wall Street Journal]

]]>
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:56:06 EDT AddyDugdale http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280087&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ iPhone Adobe Flash Support Coming ]]> flash_iphone.jpgCritics have bashed Apple for omitting Adobe Flash support from the iPhone's "real life" Safari browser, and with good reason: a quick spin around the Web on an iPhone reveals sites that don't work, or don't work well without the plug-in. Now, it's rumored to be coming, via a quote from Mossberg himself. The question is, was the original exclusion of Flash a technical decision or a business decision?

You'll recall Apple's celebrated announcement of YouTube support. However, the fine print suggested you couldn't get all YouTube video, but only those that had been rolled over to the Apple-favored H.264 video codec.

Although this was arguably a technical hurdle, Archos had just announced and demonstrated a Wi-Fi media player that could easily browse YouTube, and queue up any video on the site, using an Opera browser with Flash plug-in. Did the Archos 605 have that much more processing muscle? Teardowns of the iPhone have revealed a sufficiently sturdy ARM processor, so we think it's doubtful.

My suspicion is that a Flash-friendly iPhone wasn't good leverage to convince Google to adopt the H.264 codec crucial to the YouTubin' success of the browserless Apple TV platform. By giving YouTube special favoritism in the iPhone launch, Apple got Google to do its codec swaperoo. But people have demanded more, because this isn't just about YouTube. People want Flash for non video stuff, too. (Games, websites that choose to unwisely use it for their entire menu structure)

A more simple and therefore probably reason is that Apple and Adobe didn't have enough time to build it into the phone. Not an issue, since firmware every quarter, flush with features, is the way gadgets roll these days. (Zune, Xbox, Wii.)

The man who ought to know, Walt Mossberg, says that Flash will come as a simple software update, answering our question about technical capability:

Apple says [to Mossberg, not to the general public] it plans to add that plug-in through an early software update, which I am guessing will occur within the next couple of months.

Let those software updates roll!

Questions About Apple's iPhone [Allthingsd.com]

]]>
Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:01:02 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=275317&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Opinions Side-By-Side In Our iPhone Review Matrix ]]>
If you were too lazy to actually read the four iPhone reviews that came out last night, we've done the hard part and stuck the most salient tidbits into a chart, hoping to see both agreement and dissent among the elders: David Pogue of the New York Times, Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal, Ed Baig of USA Today and Steven Levy of Newsweek. (What happened to Lev Grossman at Time Magazine? He usually gets the Apple stuff early too.) Jump for our painstakingly created review matrix—it's fun to notice what words they all use, and when one totally disagrees with the rest.


The iPhone Matches Most of Its Hype [New York Times]

The iPhone is Breakthrough Handheld Computer [Wall Street Journal]

Apple's iPhone isn't perfect, but it's worthy of the hype [USA Today]

At Last, the iPhone: A first look [Newsweek]

]]>
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:03:14 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272727&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Steve Jobs Kinda Answers Some iPhone Questions ]]> Mossberg gets Steve Jobs to talk iPhone. Except when he asks about version 2.0. Those questions are forbidden. The rest of the questions are important ones. Like will we see this on other carriers? Why no 3G? Will you include GPS? Will there be lower cost versions? Aaaaand, Jobs dodged those, too. An old lesson, learned again: Mossberg may have the power to command a Steve jobs interview, but he can't make him answer questions. [All Things D]

]]>
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:12:47 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272564&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mossberg's iPhone Video Review ]]>
Mossberg's lost the funky music in the intro, and compared to Pogue's video, he's all business. The interesting bits left out of the text review are here, like, in regards to the keyboard, "I wanted to throw it out the window after 3 days". (Of course, he came around eventually, comparing it in speed to a Treo's keyboard.)
[All Things D, Thanks John P.]

]]>
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:56:51 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272558&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breaking: Mossberg Reviews the iPhone, Says Keyboard A-OK After Five Days ]]> mossphone.pngMossberg and Boehret review the iPhone, 3 minutes after Pogue at the NYTimes. In a nutshell:
Our verdict is that, despite some flaws and feature omissions, the iPhone is, on balance, a beautiful and breakthrough handheld computer. Its software, especially, sets a new bar for the smart-phone industry, and its clever finger-touch interface, which dispenses with a stylus and most buttons, works well, though it sometimes adds steps to common functions.
And more importantly, unlike Pogue, he likes the keyboard:

The iPhone's most controversial feature, the omission of a physical keyboard in favor of a virtual keyboard on the screen, turned out in our tests to be a nonissue, despite our deep initial skepticism. After five days of use, Walt — who did most of the testing for this review — was able to type on it as quickly and accurately as he could on the Palm Treo he has used for years. This was partly because of smart software that corrects typing errors on the fly.

Then Mossberg complains about some missing features:

The iPhone is missing some features common on some competitors. There's no instant messaging, only standard text messaging. While its two megapixel camera took excellent pictures in our tests, it can't record video. Its otherwise excellent Web browser can't fully utilize some Web sites, because it doesn't yet support Adobe's Flash technology. Although the phone contains a complete iPod, you can't use your songs as ringtones. There aren't any games, nor is there any way to directly access Apple's iTunes Music Store.

(I'm not sure other browsers on phones support Flash, but I get the point.)
IPhone is Breakthrough Handheld Computer [WSJ]

]]>
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:15:50 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272540&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walt Mossberg Has the iPhone ]]> mossphone.pngOoooohhh. Someone's gonna be in trouble with Steve Jobs. Mossberg has the iPhone as of this morning, and he's already flaunting it in public. An explicit rule between Apple and A-listers with early access is that this kind of showboating is a no-no.

It's too soon for a review, but Mossberg kind of commented on the keyboard.

And I can tell you that in the first hour it works a little better than I thought, but I'm still not sure it works as well as a regular keyboard—and the first hour is not a very fair test, so I'm going to keep going at it.

For those of you counting (me) that's 18 days before day 0. When he scooped the world on Apple TV, he had it 10 days ahead of the rest of the press.

Mossberg has an iPhone [Wired]

]]>
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:57:15 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=267928&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ All Things D is Done and I'm Still Smiling ]]> D5, Mossberg and Swisher's conference is over, and I am still smiling. 100% news, no bullshit. And it was fun. Did you know that D had a Ben and Jerry's ice cream booth?

Wednesday was intense. 5 hours of liveblogging, inside of a 20 hour work day.
Ballmer and the Surface Table, with Mossy
• Mossberg and Foleo unveil by Jeff Hawkins
Mossberg and Steve Jobs
• Afterwards, basking in the glow of the Jobs interview, Ryan Block from Engadget and I got up on stage and sat in the D Chairs when no one was looking. (Photo here)
•And then my accidental Steve Jobs meeting.
•And of course, Mossberg and Swisher talking with Gates and Jobs. (Videos here)
•Not to mention the Gropes of the Surface Table and Foleo.

Afterwards, I bumped into Mossberg, and there was a little friction.

When I saw Walt and Kara, I thanked them for inviting me, and shook their hands. Walt then told me, a little bit indignant, that he was tired of being called grandpa and uncle. I felt bad about it. Factually, he is older than most in this industry...Jobs even made a crack at his age on stage. But I'd agree that it doesn't make sense to tease him for it while he's running around full of energy, wrangling CEO after CEO, while I'm dragging ass trying to merely liveblog his show. The guy's age isn't an factor when it comes to him kicking corporate ass. We're still going to photoshop him, of course. Maybe onto of a young, strapping Baywatch lifeguard's body, though.

The other thing that's interesting is that the WSJ has such pride and competitive spirit when it comes to their work...vs the NYTimes. I heard more than one comment in regards to that, from unnamed reporters.

When you work that much, its hard to get good rest afterwards. So I took Thursday to sleep in, and eat some crispy fish tacos down near the beach, while the rest of the Gizmodo gang covered the news. Thank God for them.

All Things D [Gizmodo]

]]>
Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:22:12 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265337&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Video: Jobs Says "Fake Steve" is "Pretty Funny" and Other Semi-Revelations ]]>

You like the Steve Jobs? You hate the Steve Jobs? We gave you the textier version yesterday, now here's a clip of his All Things D appearance, in full technicolor moving picture, for you to comment on in your own special way.


Jobs on YouTube Weirdness, Windows Love and "Fake Steve"

]]>
Thu, 31 May 2007 08:24:10 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264758&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Jobs v. Gates: The Movie ]]> <

What we thought might be a Showdown at Carlsbad was, in reality, a love-in at the Four Seasons. Steve and Bill had good times, reminiscing and talking about the future. There was Beatles music to harmonize to (though Yoko was mercifully nowhere to be found). Jobs even revealed that he and Gates had been secretly married for years. (Wait, he was kidding?) Enjoy the video.

D: Notebook [WSJ]
Live Rumble: Bill Gates vs. Steve Jobs vs. Swisher vs. Mossberg [Gizmodo]

]]>
Thu, 31 May 2007 08:03:30 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264752&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Live Rumble: Bill Gates vs. Steve Jobs vs. Swisher vs. Mossberg ]]> 7:15 The show is about to start, and I've got major butterflies. Fingers don't fail me.

7:19: No one's on stage, but there's a video on screen, of the Macintosh dating game. The year is 1983, and Microsoft needs Apple to make half its revenue. Jobs is introducing Bill, and Bill has scripted lovely things to say about Apple. It's stable. It's wonderful. He loves it.

Fast-forward to the year 2007, at All Things D. Jobs and Gates are about to appear, and Mossberg and Swisher are about to grill them. I'm convinced, after the earlier sessions, that Mossberg has the strength of 10 bulls, and the wit of 100 elephants. Cyborg elephants. They are going to get these guys talking. And maybe fighting.

The second video shows Jobs at the 1997 Keynote, announcing the reestablished relationship with Microsoft.

They both look like Goobers. God, I'm glad no one has '80s footage of me.

The first comments are happening, and they're all softballs. Jobs is kissing up, saying Gates started the first software company, and was ahead of everyone in that regard. Now the potshots, right? RIGHT? Shoryuken?

Wrong. Gates is saying that Jobs was a stud for taking a risk on the Mac. And that he respects that. OK, where are the body blows? Killing with kindness?

He does deny being Fake Steve. Please. No one suspected you had the style to write like Fake Steve, Bill. No one.

Now they're thinking about the old days. Remember the disk drive and the 128KB of RAM?
Mossberg remembers the time when only thousands had found the Mac. And when the Apple ][ had Microsoft software inside. Remember the Alltair? Me? I can't imagine the punchcards. I'm too young.

7:34 Gates is telling the story of how they started working together, totally geeking out. And then Jobs CUTS him off. "Let me tell the story." [You shmuck.] Basically, Jobs needed Gates' floating point BASIC. And gates thought it was a BLAST delivering the data on tapes.

Steve thought his PC was going to be cheaper...Gates is laughing while saying this..."but it was mine."
(I see why he's laughing! Money!)

Gates is moving a lot. He's twitching his left foot. Jobs is moving his left foot. They cross their legs the same. Like ladies, kind of. But in opposite directions. I'm only writing this, because they're talking about how much memory the old computers had again. 28k? 128k? This is like when you try to get Pokemon to battle, but they don't listen to you.

Steve and I launched Excel together in NY. That was fun.

jobsvsgates7wm.jpg

Apple didn't differentiate their product. When Steve wasn't there, things were slower.

Steve J

Bill Amelio had a saying. Apple was a ship with the hole in the bottom, and my job was to point it in the right direction.

Mossberg doesn't want to go through the whole history. Jobs thanks him.

7:40 Apple was in very serious trouble, and if the game was a zero sum game, then Apple was going to lose. But a lot of people's heads were in that place.

Jobs:

Apple wasn't going to beat Microsoft. It didn't need to. It needed to remember that Apple was Apple. And Microsoft was the biggest developer for the Mac at that time. It was crazy.

Swisher lobs a feeler. Do you consider yourself rivals? She likes PC guy better.

The art of those guys is not to be mean, but for them to like each other.

Aw...huggles.

7:44 Mossy fires the right hand for a second taunt: How often is Apple on radar as a target? (Since Apple is tiny.)

Zune thinks Apple is a competitor. And Jobs fires back that he loves Zune team because they're all competitors. Here we go.

Steve is Soooo known for his restraint
(Gates rolls eyes.)

Mossberg and Swisher are still pushing. Do you follow Vista?

Jobs repeats his software mantra....hypnotically: An iPod is software. Beautiful box, but it's software. A Mac is OS X. A Mac isn't going to take over 80% of the market. But Apple is a software company. And there aren't a lot of them left. Microsoft is one of them.

Mossberg breaks in to go back to his last blog post, from nearly three weeks ago. Software and hardware lines are blogging. Jobs responds with a quote from someone.
People who love software want to do their own hardware.

Bill says naaah aaaah, he can resist. He sounds almost afraid of that. So really, what's going on with Zune and Xbox? That doesn't sound very confident.

Moss: Could you have more marketshare? (Basically, Mossberg is asking him if he's ashamed of the marketshare, and if he has any regrets.)

Personally, I find it absurd that the marketshare is so low. Seriously. It confuses the hell out of me. It's like watching people fight to be in the Matrix.

Gates helps him save face, reminding him of the inverse positions in the music player market. More hugs.

"Let's talk about today, before tomorrow." Swisher directs Jobs towards addressing reality. Ladies and gents, she just shut down the Reality Distortion Field. Totally cockblocked.

Mossberg:

You guys represent the rich client, the personal computer. And the room might agree that this is all going to the cloud. Maybe one of you would think about you two as rivals, but maybe as...

Jobs:
Dinosaurs?

7:56 Gates: "

You're always going to have rich local usability. Use the richness with the richness that is elsewhere.

Is he bragging about how much money he has?

7:57: Jobs talking about Google maps, and how much he loves it. But that his iPhone client is way better than the computer version that Google had. Jobs:

And you can run a rich client on a lower and lower devices.

jobsvsgates10wm.jpg

Mossberg:

You use a tablet
(to Bill)?
Gates:
Yes. This is like Windows 1992. It has yet to take off....I think.

8:03 Gates starts swings his arms around. A lot. he's explaining what his ecosystem of devices would look like. It's totally confusing. He's talking about projectors everywhere, and devices. And he's confusing everyone.

Jobs basically feels, quite simply, that the PC will continue to be with us, as it morphs. Into the post PC era.

Gates is talking about scrolls in pocket devices.

8:08 Mossberg:

What will be on the pocket device of the future?

Jobs:
I don't know. Five years ago, I wouldn't have predicted maps.

Jobs:

There's a zillion interesting things going on. The most interesting things are the new services. Things that help you navigate through life more easily. I think you'll see more of that in the next year or two.

YES!. Mossberg is taking a shot at .Mac. He thinks it could have been utilized more. And Steve agrees, and promises to be doing more in the near future, make up for lost time.
And now he's taking Gates to task for not advancing Live Anywhere. Gates nods.

And Mossberg delivers a follow-up question. After all the cloud talk, he asks if he thinks the hardware guys are going to lose to the service clouds, with 10 employees, who are starting like those two are started.

Gates justifies his position. Jobs repeats the message from before. That Apple is just Apple. They'll focus on their thang. And partner with the new people who are good at what they do.

BTW, rich tech geniuses do lots of weird things with their hands as they talk. Like Italian mamas.

8:15 Gates:

We're not an entertainment company.

8:16 Mossberg is asking about Apple's role in entertainment, Disney stuff aside.

8:17 Jobs replies that it'll be a driving force, but I'm not sure that's a different answer than Microsoft. Look at Xbox's Marketplace, which is pretty damn nice.

Mossberg is building up for a big question. The build up suggests that there's a really hard question at this. "Is there a new paradigm for the personal computer?" HA! That's what I asked Bill at CES. He said no then. Now let's see what he says. He's talking about 3D, and books in a library. I'm lost. He's getting lost in the nuts. He didn't flat-out say no. Actually, I'm not sure what he said.

Mossberg pulls us back to reality with a firm question about multitouch. Will we see it in laptops?

Now he's talking about cameras everywhere. And playing tennis...

Mossberg jumps in, pulls him back to firm ground again. He's speaking at length to clear Gates' buffer.

Gates is going off about ink. 3D. Vision.

I'm going to stop typing until the thoughts are clear....give it five minutes.

I think Jobs has been meditating while Gates was rattling off a bunch of unintegrated random tech.
He's there, with both hands together. Speaking slowly, clearly.

They don't want a car with six wheels. They want to drive with a steering wheel. Not a joystick. Sometimes you have to augment, sometimes to have to rethink. It'll happen with these post-PC devices.

Swisher: What's the greatest misunderstanding about your relationship?

Jobs:

We've kept our marriage secret for over a decade.

I pee myself.

Gates is going off again, but I think he means to say that it's nice that Jobs has been around as long as he has. And has the guts to take the risk to do something new.

Jobs:

When Bill and I worked together in the early days, generally, we were the youngest guys in the room. I'm about six months older. And now we're the oldest, generally. Which is why I love being here.
[With mossberg]

Jobs

To quote the Beatles, You and I have memories longer than the road that stretches out ahead, and that's definitely true here.

Standing ovation for Jobs. Nice grab and use of the Beatles quote. I wonder if he's allowed to use those lyrics, legally. I wish I could clap, because I'm moved, but I'm typing. A lot.

Question session is here.

Sony pictures guy, ready to serve up a self-interested question, I'm sure.

My life has been better by fewer standards...can we simplify the standards and systems in life, things can be better.

A fucking Sony Pictures guy just said that! Jobs replied that he and Bill can agree that they'll be happy if there's only two making standards, jokingly.

Gates notes that the industry is good at making standards and then weeding out the old ones.

There's a good question about legacy: Could Gates' philanthropy work dwarf his Microsoft work?

Gates: Software is my life's work.

My brain is filled with software.

To Jobs: Do you envy his second act?
Jobs

I think the world is a better place for him not working to be the richest guy in the cemetery.

Jobs
We're the luckiest guys in the planet, and we found what we love to do, and were in the right place at the right time. It's hard to beat that. Your family and that. I don't think about legacy much.

8:38 Advice to the people starting out in business?
Gates:

The excitement wasn't driven by economic value. We didn't think we'd have to be a big company to be in every house. We thought about every doubling as the last.

Jobs: You have to love it. And you have to be a good talent scout.

What did you learn about starting your own business that you saw in the other guy?
Gates:

I wish I had Steve's taste. In people and product. It's magical. In that case. Wow.

Jobs:
Because Woz and I started the company by doing the whole banana, we weren't good at partnering. Microsoft was one of the few who was good at that.

Jobs is talking about the senior citizens and their Macs, because of the iSights.

This question is being done by the Simpson's comic book guy.
"We all share our science fiction roots, the metaverse, etc. What will we see in the next five years?"
Gates:

Steve is going to introduce his transporter.

Jobs:
Just give me Star Trek
Gates: [To paraphase, he sees a lot of little interesting UI hacks. Honestly, I tuned out.]
Jobs:
I don't know what we'll see. And that's why I'm so excited to go to work every day.

Finish.


All Things D at Giz [Gizmodo]

]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 22:22:56 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264694&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Steve and Bill...in Pirates of Silicon Valley ]]> Bill and Steve go on stage in about 30 minutes or so. And before they start pulling each other's hair, and before Walt starts dancing around these two with tough questions, I'd like to take this moment to remind you of Pirates of Silicon Valley, the made-for-TV, unauthorized 1999 "docudrama" of how Steve got rich and cool, and Bill got so rich he doesn't even care how cool he is. (Only $7.49 on Amazon, btw.)

Anthony Michael Hall, who played a perverted panty-sniffing geek in both Weird Science and Sixteen Candles plays Bill Gates. Noah Wyle, pretty boy doctor from ER, plays a young Jobs. This movie was made far too early, if you ask me. Someone needs to do a proper sequel.


Pirates of Silicon Valley [IMDB]
Pirates of Silicon Valley [Wikipedia]
Pirates of Silicon Valley [Amazon]

]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 22:04:27 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264353&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Meeting Steve Jobs ]]> I bumped into Steve Jobs in the hall a little while ago, on the way to lunch at All Things D.

He's taller than I thought he would be, and pretty tanned. Hawaii. I go to introduce myself and then think that he's probably busy and doesn't want to be mobbed. I go get some salad, think that its my job to be at least a little aggressive with these things, so I put down my plate, and I finally squeeze by the crowd to introduce myself. No banter, just wanted to say hi, I'm Brian from Gizmodo. And you made the iPod, right? (I didn't say that second part.)

Then Steve got really excited and Happy.

And he tells me that he reads the site. Actually, 3-4 times a day, since it doesn't sit still for very long. I told him that I appreciate the clicks, and that I'll keep buying iPods if he keeps clicking. It's his favorite gadget blog. It was a really, really nice moment. His face scrunched up with genuine excitement. I must have looked like one of those gals front row at a Beatles concert, as much as I tried to be "professional."

Because honestly, I thought the guy would be totally worked up about Jesus's awesome Photoshops of Steve Jobs. The man has a sense of humor.

It was an honor to have a man who is extremely focused on quality and doing things in his own way approve of our work here. Especially with all the typos I make on a daily basis. For the record, he didn't invite me over to smoke with him. But believe me, I think it's pretty cool to have met the guy.

All Things D at Giz [Gizmodo]

]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 19:13:22 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264661&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Steve Jobs at D Now ]]>
[UPDATE Youtube on Apple TV. More Below]

12:15 We're at the fluffy intro
12:21 WM When you made the change to Apple from Apple Computer, people wondered if it was the exit. Are you committed to computers?
SJ Totally. WWDC is big. Leopard is coming in October. we love it.

12:22 WM Are you planning a big iPod change?
SJ You mean since last Sept?
WM Yes
SJ Fast-moving business!
WM Well, it wasn't completely new.
SJ....
WM I wasn't taking your feelings into account.
SJ We're working on the best iPod ever and its awesome.

WM You have a phone?
SJ Yes (whips it out) best iPod we've ever made. Best phone we've ever made!
WM Coming out end of June, last day?
SJ Uh, yeah. I'll send you one. (giggles)

12:26 WM Selling it through the stores and Cingular?
SJ Yes, Cingular, which is the new AT&T.
WM Just like the old AT&T. You're a lot nicer to the phone companies now.
SJ Well, yes, We haven't sold one yet but they broke a lot of rules. And we did the same. We wouldn't show it to them. And we took a gamble on each other. I will never forget that.

12:27 WM Why did this work? They wanted your brand to go along with their new brand?

SJ So far, music's not doing well on phones. On phones, you have 3G, but not good ways to use it. You get the baby Internet and the mini Internet, but nothing real. We're doing that in an entirely new way. We'll see.

12:28 WM Any feature in the iPhone you'd like to announce that you haven't yet shared?

SJ Uh, no.

[iTunes Plus Songs now]

SJ [Pretty simple UI, you can upgrade old music as long as its available.]

WM Any other movement on the record labels?

SJ Well you know that record labels sell 90% of their stuff online (goes into the details in the open letter to music industry)...

WM Was that letter you wrote something you thought up or was it a thing already in movement? [We reported that EMI sent the letter first.]

SJ People say iPod locks down music. But we never said that.

WM The iPod is your business, and your music is a little bit of that.

SJ There's 3 pieces to it. There's iTunes, which is free, there's the iPod, and there's the online store in the cloud.

WM But the iPod is the biggest part.

SJ it makes the most money...but most of the music money goes to the music company.

WM Do you risk that money as you break the DRM tie?

SJ The iPod wins because its the best music player, and we have to keep doing that.

WM Is the iPhone a phone with an iPod inside or is it the iPod with a phone inside?

SJ It's 3 things. It's the best iPod, a remarkable phone, and the Internet in your pocket.


12:34 WM how much back and forth is there inside, developing. I assume its like the UN where you have a veto.

SJ It's not like that. If you want to keep talented people you can't tell them what to do all the time...much.

WM How much debate about a physical keyboard?

SJ None.

WM Really? In ALL of Cupertino?

SJ. Yep.

SJ [Makes comment about the photographer that sounds like a machine gun in the audience.]

SJ I'll bet you dinner, after a few days, after you get one, you'll think its great.
Once you learn to trust it, you fly. And the screen UI can change as you come up with new ideas.

SJ Cingular said we need this button. They hadn't seen it yet. Oh, I said that we'll do that after we ship. They said, huh?

SJ Why is Apple popular? Because the preeminent Japanese gadget companies couldn't do software.

The iPhone is software wrapped in a beautiful package. And the companies couldn't make that leap. And that's why Apple has that success with the iPod.

If you look at hardware manufacturers for handsets, they haven't been able to make the leap.

The usual suspects will try to copy the hardware. But the software is hard to do; 5 years ahead of anything we've seen. We started with an OS we've been working on for well over a decade and a browser, Safari, which is regarded by many as the best.

12.41 WM But it doesn't have the entire OS X software inside, or Safari.

SJ Yes, it does. A lot of it is data. Desktop patterns, audio files. It has real desktop email, Safari, OS X. And we took all that, and put a new UI on it. It's an amazing amount of software.

WM On the technical side, could an OS X app run on the iPhone?

SJ We don't think that's a good idea. The phone has its own UI.

12:43 WM One of the holy grails is to have the Internet in your pocket. And TV in the living room. Microsoft does this. Why do you describe the living room as a hobby?

The living room might be the peas on the side. The entree might be the things that you'd get on the Internet.

I brought something to show you...[something new for Apple TV?]

[Showing Apple TV now, movie trailers for Ratatouille]

WM Works on a regular home network? [Snowball questions, if you ask me.]

WM The device won't do high-def?

SJ No HD, for the trade-offs in download time and quality.


[BTW, Steve jobs is wearing gray New Balance shoes and a black turtleneck.]

[And showing TVs now...The Office, and more old stuff. He's playing with old stuff, described as Peas. Where is the entree yet to come?]

SJ But we're going to introduce today is...

12;51 Wouldn't it be great if you could see YouTube in your living room. YOUTUBE ON APPLE TV
jobs4wm.jpg
12:54 SJ I would have waited a few weeks for this announcement, but you know...
WM But This is D.

SJ Shows related videos when you're done.
jobs5wm.jpg

[ Robot Dance Video playing]
WM Did you ever think that after you started Apple, you'd be associating with the robot guy?
SJ It's funny, we've been watching a lot of these vids.
WM Does that mean Leopard is slipping again?!
SJ *Chuckles....[in a sinister way.]
[Showing search, fumbling]
jobs8wm.jpg

12:54 WM Oh yeah, you're not very good at public speaking [sarcasm]
[Showing human slingshot video.]

WM How about other stuff on the Internet?
SJ Sure, that's a great idea?
WM When?
SJ Over time.

SJ People don't want a normal browser in the living room.

WM Even with the human slingshot...

SJ That's my species!

WM But you're committed to the living room with this set-top?

1:00 SJ It's not a set-top box. Once you get into that space, you get into a whole 'nother thing. There's a lot more DVD players out there than DVD players. We don't have to be replacing the set-top box. We're replacing the DVD player. It's the DVD player for the Internet.

WM How many copies of iTunes [which is what you need for Apple TV]?
SJ Lots. Several times.
WM 100 million ipods, so 300 million?
SJ That, or more.
WM So you're a huge Windows developer?
SJ That's right. People have written us saying iTunes is their favorite app on Windows.

SJ It's like giving a glass of ice water to someone in hell.

SJ We never though we'd ship 100 million.
WM Even you, with your humility?
SJ 100 million is a lot.

WM You said at one point, people didn't want portable video. Even after shipping.

1:05 SJ I was more skeptical than the customers, and they've proved us wrong. Video has been the first or second reason why people have bought it.
WM On iTunes or iPods?
SJ Can't find out unless we ask, and its both. This will grow.
WM But you don't have a video service that allows you to natively download, over the air, to an iPhone.
SJ No.
WM Why not? It's a big deal, carriers are trying it.
SJ It's failed. The phone is not the best UI to discover media, and it costs more. Then you have to sync it back to your PC, so its backed up so you don't lose a few hundred dollars of media. You can do it from your PC with a big screen.

WM So no store plans for the iPhone? iTunes store on a phone?
SJ Certainly nothing we have to do today.

Questions: What do you look for in talent?
SJ: That's a long question. We don't build four billion semiconductor factories. All we are are people. And all we have is the people, and recruiting is the heart and soul of what we do.

1:10 Question: This is a 2.5G device. You said that there aren't any 3G Apps. Can you comment?

Sure. Our phone switches to Wi-Fi automatically, if you've joined it before. But when you're in a new place, it lets you know if there's a new signal around. There're everywhere. Some of personal ones you can ride on. It's everywhere. Fifty signals in Palo Alto. And there's 10x points out there than I thought.

Some weird comment about orifices.
1:14 Question: We'd love to write apps. Will it open up?
SJ This is a very important trade-off between security and openness. We want both. We've got good ideas, and sometime later this year, we can open it up to third-party apps, and keep security.

1:16 Question: I work with Japanese companies, and they ask us to help with battery life.
SJ When you talk about anything portable, like an iPod or a phone, it's all about battery life. We have experience with this making notebooks. We brought that tech into the phone. That's one of the key problems with portable devices.

1:18 Question: You had a bad time a two years ago. How are you now?

SJ I'm still vertical! Thank you.

Question: [Some guy asking wonky question about AAC being a limited form of DRM.]
SJ First of all, MP3 plays fine on iPods. Secondly, AAC is a better file format as far as quality. We don't own it, people license it from it.

Question: I work for a camcorder company. Are you entering the field? [More or less]
SJ We don't plan on entering the camcorder industry.

1:24 Question: I was going to ask if you read the Fake Steve Jobs blog.

SJ I have read a lot of the Fake Steve Jobs posts, and I think they're funny. But I don't know who it is.

Question person: I don't write it.

[He asked a real question, but it was not as interesting as his fake one. ]

Done! More Steve Jobs tonight, along with Gates, Mossy, and Swisher.

All Things D at Giz [Gizmodo]

]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 16:19:32 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264586&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ YouTube on Apple TV - It's Official ]]>
It goes live in a few weeks.

Read more in the liveblog.

All Things D at Giz [Gizmodo]

appletvyoutube.jpg


YouTube Coming to Apple TV

CUPERTINO, California-May, 30, 2007-Apple® today announced that it's bringing the Internet's most popular originally-created content from YouTube to the living room with Apple TV™. Beginning in mid-June, Apple TV will wirelessly stream videos directly from YouTube and play them on a user's widescreen TV. Using Apple TV's elegant interface and simple Apple Remote, viewers can easily browse, find and watch free videos from YouTube in the comfort of their living room.

"This is the first time users can easily browse, find and watch YouTube videos right from their living room couch, and it's really, really fun," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "YouTube is a worldwide sensation, and Apple TV is bringing it directly from the Internet onto the widescreen TV in your living room."

Thousands of the most current and popular YouTube videos will be available on Apple TV at launch in mid-June, with YouTube adding thousands more each week until the full YouTube catalog is available this fall. With Apple TV's stunning interface and simple Apple Remote, users can easily navigate through YouTube's familiar video browsing categories or search for specific videos. YouTube members can also log-in to their YouTube accounts on Apple TV to view and save their favorite videos.

Apple TV seamlessly integrates with iTunes® to wirelessly play a user's favorite content from a PC or Mac® on their widescreen TV, including movies, TV shows, music, photos and podcasts. Apple TV users can choose from over 500 movies and 350 TV shows in near DVD quality; over five million songs; 5,000 music videos; 100,000 podcasts; and 20,000 audiobooks from the iTunes Store (www.itunes.com). Users can enjoy their favorite music on a home entertainment system and view slideshows of their photo albums on a widescreen TV.

Apple today also announced that it is offering a new Apple TV build-to-order option with a 160GB hard drive. The new larger hard drive offers four times the storage for up to 200 hours of video, 36,000 songs, 25,000 photos or a combination of each.* Apple TV is easy to connect to a broad range of widescreen TVs and home theater systems and comes standard with HDMI, component video, analog and optical audio ports. Using high-speed AirPort® 802.11n Wi-Fi wireless networking, Apple TV can auto-sync content from one computer or stream content from up to five additional computers right to a TV without any wires.**

Pricing & Availability
Apple TV, which includes the Apple Remote, is available through the Apple Store® (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $299 (US). Apple TV with a 160GB hard drive will be available tomorrow for a suggested retail price of $399 (US). The YouTube feature for Apple TV will be available as a free software update in mid-June.

Apple TV requires iTunes 7.1 or later running on a Mac with Mac OS® X version 10.3.9 or later, or a Windows PC with Windows XP Home/Professional (SP2).

An 802.11b/g/n wireless network using AirPort, AirPort Extreme® or 10/100 Base-T Ethernet networking is required. Internet access is required and a broadband connection is recommended, fees may apply. Apple TV requires an enhanced definition or high-definition widescreen TV. iPod® games will not play on Apple TV. The iTunes store is available in the US and select countries.

*Video playback based on 640x480 iTunes video content. Music capacity based on four minutes per song and 128-Kbps AAC encoding. Photo capacity based on Apple TV viewable photos transferred from iTunes. Actual capacity varies by content.

**Based on an IEEE 802.11n draft specification. Compatible with 802.11b/g/n, wireless video streaming requires an 802.11g/n network.

Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and will enter the mobile phone market this year with its revolutionary iPhone.


]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 15:52:00 EDT Noah Robischon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264594&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ First Palm Foleo Hands On and Impressions ]]> It would be redundant to step through the Foleo right after Hawkins gave us a feature tour, but I have held the hardware, and it is impressively light (physically and software wise). It looks like a fanless, or near fanless design, the screen is very nice, and the keyboard reminds me of a Toshiba Tecra (a favorable thing). It looks to be a very efficient machine. If you overlook all the crazy buttons for navigation. And I thought the Thinkpad num/trackpad with multiple buttons was bad. That's not simplicity in design. There is a dedicated email button, which is a nice touch, as well as an Apps button that goes to the Dataviz office docs, the photo viewer, web browser, etc. The menu is top left, like a mac/windows hybrid and is favorably clean. But that's what happens when your device has no apps. What does it take to compile software to run on the Foleo.

Would I buy one? No, I'm not a smart phone junkie.

]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 14:37:00 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264558&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Liveblog: Palm Foleo Unveil Now! ]]> Jeff Hawkins just dropped Foleo photos on us. It looks like it's subnotebook-sized, but it's a smartphone companion, designed to make it a full computing experience.

10:33 He's talking about the need for a better interface. And took a jab at origami.
10:36 Battery life is great. Five hours of real access running Wi-Fi, etc.
10:38 WM Looks like a laptop, I know how you're positioning it, but that doesn't matter.
JH is totally being a cock tease, and Mossy is telling JH to get on with the show. He keeps calling it a laptop. That doesn't run stuff.
10:40 JH It's Velvety. Runs Linux, 10-inch screen, boots almost instantly. No sleep, just on and off.
10:43 WM Like the Clapper.
JH Syncs with the phone, not just for exchange stuff. Makes the data centric to the phone. Easy to use, not for corporate types only.


I'll update photos in the gallery as they come, but the text will be running below

WM Blackberry?
JH Talk about it later.

[They're doing a demo of the of the four steps to sync the Treo and the Foleo. Pairs with Bluetooth.]

WM You can navigate using the thumb pad device [which supposedly supplements the nipple thing] (Swisher's words, not mine.)

[They're showing Dataviz editing Office docs using a full-screen version. Looks very fast. Can make things from scratch]
[WM happy people can do office stuff from the device]
[Showing a Linux terminal, crowd turns aside, sick to their stomachs]
10:57 [runs opera browser, uses phone connection, over BT. Flash runs fine. The video stuff is slow. Won't do flash video, including YouTube.]

WM Let me get this straight. It won't do the hottest thing on the Web? [They blame the flashware, but its obviously the processor]
JH Let me be clear&mdash:it will do it, but not well.
WM When?
JH UHHH...In th