@bosskev: Oh, no those aren't 89¢ Radio Shack switches. They are $27.50 Aeronautical grade toggle switches. Much higher quality: titanium stems, gold-plated contacts, the works. Maybe Virgin Galactic couldn't afford Military-grade switches, but those will do.
@AEchinoderm: And the difference between Aeronautical-grade toggles and Military-grade toggles would be moving the price's decimal point two places to the right?
@bosskev: All kidding (and sarcastic snarking) aside, toggle switches have more resilience to flight stress and provide definitive tactile response. They are also less likely to be accidently "momentarily" actuated as a short-throw button, and can used with or without gloves with less chance of causing a problem. Furthermore, with a single glance the flight crew can instantly determine the status of a given switch without the need for a additional power-draining hardware. The pole sin the toggle switch also provide a hard-contact power connection which is less likely to arc or decay in the event of loss of pressurization or atmospheric contaminants (such as corrosive gases released from potential onboard fire).
While it may not look sexy, there's a damn good reason why certain hardware remains in use: reliability, safety and simplicity.
Sadly, most people simply think it's "outdated" tech that isn't as good, while the opposite is actually true. Glass touchscreens and flush-mount "momentary" buttons would be extremely detrimental, highly counter-productive, energy intensive and exceedingly dangerous.
I'm amazed by the amount of armchair-aeronautical engineers who think they could do better, and I wonder why they didn't claim the $10 million Ansari X Prize. Things to ponder.
@OMG! Ponies!: You mean, like an iPhone? Maybe. But with my luck, I'd be in mid-flight when the app that controls everything would be unapproved and yanked.
Wow, that's a much more complex cockpit than SS1. If you don't remember, SS1's cockpit was basically a joystick and a single LCD multifunction display.
Forget what this guy says. Virgin won't be the only ones trying this in the future. Other more visionary engineers and designers and industrialists will eventually try an approach that works. These assumptions always stem from our limited understanding of technology, and then some ambitious crazy person/people in a laboratory, or a workshop, will come up with something that blows our minds away and we move forward.
I think we'll always need to explore. If not, well we'll need to rely on the mentalists to retain knowledge for us while we fall into a Dark Age.
A catastrophic event in the next few thousand years sounds alarmist. The sun will blow up in 5 billion years, some other life-imperiling natural catastrophe will almost certainly happen before that, and could technically happen at any time. But the chances of it happening in the next few thousand years is as unlikely as our ability to respond to it with this kind of nascent technology.
I wonder how many years it would take to develop space exploration to the point where it could conceivably shuttle our species to another home if the Earth became a big hot mess? Given that space flight is only 50 years old, I wonder what the practical goals could be in 500 years (outposts on all planets?), 5,000 years (travel beyond solar system?) or 50,000 years (wormholes, universal wifi with happy meals, etc.)?
@frigg: Within 500 years (probably more like 100) we will have created AI that is smarter than us and getting smarter. At that point I think all bets are off.
@radarskiy: you wouldn't necessarily have to transport the whole population to save the species. You're also assuming birth rates will continue to accelerate. It's possible with dramatically longer life spans, birth rates will dramatically decrease.
what is 'cheap' supposed to mean? Airline travel isn't cheap and yet many people do it, mainly because they have to. We will have extensive space travel when we actually need it, when there is a military or economic purpose to it. Governments and corporations lack foresight beyond five years, so by the time we really need to send tons of cargo and hundreds of people up there ASAP we will be completely unprepared for it, in typical human fashion.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
@Homerjay. Good and good for you.:.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
its a simple timer from radio shack. Commonly used by model airplane pilots to track their time in flight.
Apparently they have a very low budget?
07/29/09
07/29/09
/sorely dissapointed
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
Please. At least have the decency to camouflage them with a series of colorful, randomly blinking diodes.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
While it may not look sexy, there's a damn good reason why certain hardware remains in use: reliability, safety and simplicity.
Sadly, most people simply think it's "outdated" tech that isn't as good, while the opposite is actually true. Glass touchscreens and flush-mount "momentary" buttons would be extremely detrimental, highly counter-productive, energy intensive and exceedingly dangerous.
I'm amazed by the amount of armchair-aeronautical engineers who think they could do better, and I wonder why they didn't claim the $10 million Ansari X Prize. Things to ponder.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
05/05/09
I think we'll always need to explore. If not, well we'll need to rely on the mentalists to retain knowledge for us while we fall into a Dark Age.
05/05/09
I wonder how many years it would take to develop space exploration to the point where it could conceivably shuttle our species to another home if the Earth became a big hot mess? Given that space flight is only 50 years old, I wonder what the practical goals could be in 500 years (outposts on all planets?), 5,000 years (travel beyond solar system?) or 50,000 years (wormholes, universal wifi with happy meals, etc.)?
05/05/09
05/05/09
05/05/09
@radarskiy: you wouldn't necessarily have to transport the whole population to save the species. You're also assuming birth rates will continue to accelerate. It's possible with dramatically longer life spans, birth rates will dramatically decrease.
05/05/09
05/05/09
05/05/09
05/05/09
Airline travel isn't cheap and yet many people do it, mainly because they have to.
We will have extensive space travel when we actually need it, when there is a military or economic purpose to it. Governments and corporations lack foresight beyond five years, so by the time we really need to send tons of cargo and hundreds of people up there ASAP we will be completely unprepared for it, in typical human fashion.
05/05/09